Buy new:
$7.97
FREE delivery Tuesday, May 21 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Ships from: Amazon
Sold by: BLUE BOX MEDIA
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Tuesday, May 21 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$7.97 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$7.97
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon
Ships from
Amazon
Sold by
Sold by
Returns
30-day easy returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
Disc plays perfectly and is in great condition. Packaging may show slight signs of wear as may the cover art. Customer satisfaction guaranteed!.
FREE delivery Monday, May 20 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$7.97 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$7.97
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.

Star Trek Into Darkness (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital HD)

4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 45,749 ratings
IMDb7.7/10.0

$7.97
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE Returns
Additional Blu-ray options Edition Discs
Price
New from Used from
Blu-ray
September 10, 2013
Combo with Digital Copy
2
$7.97
$4.40 $1.95
Watch Instantly with Rent Buy
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$7.97","priceAmount":7.97,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"7","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"97","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"sEaTpP6OryQ%2FpN%2BLQ7gKxwS%2BgTxmIdL0KeAHZUuCtpzD5%2Bk9Ou3WYcdfdaw5rDkawUv%2FTl5S0ZuqWqG5mdS6m9YNDZPYaTEbAbCZuR5KgBQbvEn6FI2BSB2x5nEaS65BrvRfBe2heZ2b6zI6kU4YqC0%2Bd%2B0WgM7jXlj5NUbMr3jJA%2Bj1bb48ljdzrTymOQqP","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$5.80","priceAmount":5.80,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"5","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"80","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"sEaTpP6OryQ%2FpN%2BLQ7gKxwS%2BgTxmIdL04TgX5YzIgGBUCibySjL5KWeehORdmQz6nOEQuDE2D2H2IOqAjjwYkwnjim%2BRbubS538olsHCdwCO%2Bh8%2FBpzTqmWZgj6fEmUokkRgP%2BQhvb0gRq5YARJrecHiVUkXOW2%2Bnz0k28nENTi18KqL4JJbwz5CJKTicKbo","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

Genre Science Fiction & Fantasy
Format Color, Blu-ray, Widescreen, Dubbed, Dolby, Subtitled, AC-3, Digital_copy
Contributor Anton Yelchin, Karl Urban, John Cho, Peter Weller, J.J. Abrams, Alice Eve, Chris Pine, Benedict Cumberbatch, Simon Pegg, Zoe Saldana, Zachary Quinto, Bruce Greenwood See more
Language English, French
Runtime 2 hours and 12 minutes
Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.
Digital Copy Notice: The purchase of this DVD or Blu-ray disc comes with rights to access a complimentary digital version from the production company. To access the digital copy, redeem the code included in your product packaging before the expiration date. Learn more

Frequently bought together

$7.97
Get it as soon as Tuesday, May 21
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Sold by BLUE BOX MEDIA and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
+
$10.78
Get it as soon as Monday, May 20
Only 19 left in stock - order soon.
Sold by Eclectic Media and Goods and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
+
$22.39
Get it as soon as Sunday, May 19
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.

Product Description

When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis. With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction. As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew. The digital code works irrespective of the expiry date.

Product details

  • Aspect Ratio ‏ : ‎ 2.40:1
  • Is Discontinued By Manufacturer ‏ : ‎ No
  • MPAA rating ‏ : ‎ PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
  • Product Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 0.6 x 5.4 x 6.7 inches; 2.08 ounces
  • Item model number ‏ : ‎ 139863
  • Director ‏ : ‎ J.J. Abrams
  • Media Format ‏ : ‎ Color, Blu-ray, Widescreen, Dubbed, Dolby, Subtitled, AC-3, Digital_copy
  • Run time ‏ : ‎ 2 hours and 12 minutes
  • Release date ‏ : ‎ September 10, 2013
  • Actors ‏ : ‎ Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg
  • Dubbed: ‏ : ‎ French, Spanish, Portuguese
  • Subtitles: ‏ : ‎ English, French, Spanish, Portuguese
  • Studio ‏ : ‎ PARAMOUNT
  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B00AZMFK3K
  • Number of discs ‏ : ‎ 2
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 45,749 ratings

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
4.7 out of 5
45,749 global ratings
Not new item
4 Stars
Not new item
When I got it you could tell it was used. The one dvd has scratches and smidges and was loose in the case. Haven’t tried to play it yet. It came on a big box because it was a special set. The side the dvd case was on had been opened. Box itself was damaged also.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2013
SPOILER ALERT!!! SPOILER ALERT!!! You have been warned!!!

Others have detailed the plot specifics so I will go with my own perspective as a lifelong Star Trek fan who started watching TOS in syndicated rerun in the mid-70's. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is my favorite Star Trek movie by far and it is in my list of the Top 10 films of all-time. So I was a bit concerned when I read the rumors on the Internet that Cumberbatch was going to reprise this iconic Science Fiction role in Star Trek: Into Darkness. I felt that JJ & company needed to do something different since they had created an alternate timeline with the first movie. I think the writing team had given lots of thought of parallel universes and how certain points and people are fixed in time in all possible universes. The work they did on Fringe pushed them to do several seasons worth of story about an alternate universe. Peter was their fixed person in the Fringe universe who impacted both realities. The writers looked at Khan the same way. I had to think about the plot threads of terrorism, betrayal, security, revenge, optimism, family and trust that were weaved through Into Darkness after seeing it Wednesday night. I then read the novelization and the prequel graphic novel to gain a better perspective before I went and watched the movie again today.

The main themes hit by this story are many such as Kirk being too young, impetuous, inexperienced, undisciplined, egotistical, etc., to command a starship effectively; Spock still suffering emotionally from the traumatic loss of his home-world and his mother while trying to connect with his erratic, emotional, impulsive Captain; Starfleet Command reacting badly to the devastating terror attack by Nero against Vulcan and Starfleet in the previous film causing Starfleet Command to turn to extraordinary extra-legal actions to bring security to the Federation despite undermining the very freedoms and ethics espoused by the Federation (Section 31); Scotty being the one crew member (besides Spock) willing to take a moral stand with Kirk over crossing the line of legality and ethics while Kirk & Starfleet are preoccupied with revenge against Khan.

So to me this wasn't a rehash of Wrath of Khan because that story was about coming to terms with growing older and feeling that life had passed you by. Kirk's past comes back to haunt him and the Enterprise and Kirk finally had to face his own Kobyashi Maru test with Spock's sacrifice. Khan was motivated by his need for vengeance against Kirk over the loss of his wife and being left marooned on a doomed planet. This too was an issue from Khan's past he could not let go and it was his undoing. ST:ID is about surviving the viccitudes of youth and learning from your mistakes to mature into a better sentient being connected to your friends and society. Kirk had Pike to place his faith and trust in him even when Kirk had royally screwed up from the hubris of flagrantly violating the Prime Directive on Nibiru even as Kirk failed to recognize this error. It took Pike's death and the pursuit of Khan to bring Kirk to the realization that he had to change his worldview and behavior.

Spock was struggling with his inner demons over the loss of Vulcan and his mother. He also made a personal journey of self-discovery in ST:ID especially after Kirk sacrificed himself to save the ship. Spock is filled with rage and pursues Khan with a fury never seen before. He helps save his friend Jim Kirk and he can now acknowledge this friendship and let it evolve.

Starfleet Command reacted like the US did after 9/11. They undermined their own principles in the name of imagined security. Admiral Marcus had sent out ships looking for resources to help Starfleet defend the Federation and they found the Botany Bay. Admiral Marcus thought he could exploit Khan's genetically engineered superior intellect and his capacity for violence to give the clandestine Section 31 (think CIA/Homeland Security/Special Forces) an advantage in building a capacity to take on the biggest perceived threat to the Federation for Admiral Marcus... the Klingon Empire. Thus you get the top-secret special prototype photon torpedoes and the built for combat USS Vengeance along with who knows what else that didn't get mentioned. You get incidents manipulated to provoke a state of war with the Klingons. All justified in the name of security.

Scotty was just awesome in this story. He was a moral compass while getting in on the action with the sabotage of the USS Vengeance. He also got some more great comedic scenes and lines. I was a bit disappointed that Bones didn't get more involved in this story but since it involved more technological issues I can see why Scotty was used rather than McCoy. Bones still got in some great metaphors and scenes and you know he can deliver Gorn babies in a crisis situation. Sulu gets a taste of the command chair and Checkov gets to flex his savant genius abilities as Scotty's replacement (temporarily) as Chief Engineer. Uhura has some issues with Spock, talks up some Klingons, battles some Klingons & makes some tough long distance calls. Getting a young Carol Marcus was cool and they didn't force her to be romantically involved with Kirk, She gets to join the crew and maybe they will hook up in the next installment. The Big E gets a refit to repair her battle damage and the crew of the USS Enterprise embark on the start of what should be an eventful, glorious and historic Five-Year Mission to Boldly Go Where No One Has Gone Before.

So I give Into Darkness a 9.235 out of 10. My biggest issue was with how long it took to warp to Kronos and then back to Earth. Unless warp speed had improved by a factor of 100 over the old Star Trek this was a plot device that was just way out of step with the rest of the movie. So other than that I am cool with the rest of the film elements as they were explained by the prequel graphic novel and in the novelization book for the film. I look forward to Star Trek 3 to come out in May of 2016 to be a part of the celebration of the 50th Anniversary of Star Trek!!!

**************DVD Release Addendum*************
I was really excited about the Blu-ray release of Into Darkness. I had read about the multitude of extras that JJ Abrams and his team shot for inclusion with the Blu-ray that would be exciting for the fans. Apparently the good folks in the marketing department at Paramount took a look at this treasure of bonus material and saw a way to extort the fans for even more profit. They struck deals to parcel out these bonus features to different retailers forcing fans to buy a plethora of copies to collect all of the bonus features. I didn't cancel my order because this isn't Amazon's fault and I do want the awesome phaser. I won't be buying these extra copies to line Paramount's pockets full of gold-pressed latinum. Actually, if Paramount had an ounce of integrity they would make a public apology for trying to screw over the fans of Star Trek who have made them profits that would make a Ferengi blush and offer a Blu-ray disc with the bonus material to make up for this error in judgement.

The website Digital Bits is where I was alerted to this shameful avarice. It stated the following: "Yes... the seven featurettes listed in the press release are basically everything you get on the disc, aside from the usual DVD copy, Digital Copy, UltraViolet copy, Xerox copy and what not. The featurettes amount to about 42 minutes of EPK-style behind the scenes material. There's no commentary, no deleted scenes, no trailers... which would be bad enough.

Except...

It turns out that more extras were created for this release - more featurettes and even an audio commentary with director J.J. Abrams and members of his crew. None of it is available on the wide release Blu-ray or Blu-ray 3D SKUs. The commentary can only be found as an iTunes "extra" download. And those extra featurettes? Some are on a Target bonus disc. Some are on a Best Buy bonus disc. And some are only available via CinemaNow and VUDU downloads. That's right: More than half of the special features created for Star Trek Into Darkness were used by Paramount's marketing team as retailer exclusives. It's a terrible way to treat your consumers, who are sometimes spending $30 or more for a Blu-ray, expecting to get a little genuine value for their money. And no, six different versions of the exact same movie isn't value. If you're a serious Blu-ray enthusiast - or for that matter a Star Trek fan of any kind - all you care about when you buy a Blu-ray is getting the movie in pristine quality with lots of extras. Though its A/V quality is exceptional, in all other respects the Star Trek Into Darkness Blu-ray is an insult." (to see the entire column, visit www - thedigitalbits - com /columns/my-two-cents/082813_1415)
12 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2013
Director: JJ Abrams.

Writers: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof.

Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho, Anton Yelchin, Bruce Greenwood, Benedict Cumberbatch, Alice Eve and Peter Weller.

Running Time: 132 minutes.

Rated: PG-13 for Intense Sequences of Sci-Fi Action and Violence.

There's something I really enjoy about JJ Abrams style of filmmaking. Yes, its flashy and fast and it may come off as a bit shallow, but there's something about it that gives off a spark that really gets me engaged. He can get establish a lot within the first 15 to 30 minutes of a movie, which would take most filmmakers quite a while to build up. Everything from the big action scenes, to the core characters and their motivations to what they do - He knows exactly what he's doing behind the camera.

A prime example of this would be when he did Super 8. Within a half hour, we know just about the entire cast, what the kids are doing in the movie, the big awesome train crash that was so publicized happens and it happens at full force and it never feels like its overstuffing its self.

Which brings us to his take on the much loved Star Trek franchise. These films of his really cause some weird reactions with people. They make nice amounts of money and get excellent reviews from critics, but if you went to a random forum on the cesspit that is the internet, you'd probably find the opposite reaction. Almost like as if Abrams and co. spat in the face of everyone's mother and other relatives.

Personally, I actually really liked - hell, maybe even loved - his reboot of the Trek franchise. Great visuals, excellent chemistry, fun dialogue, fast paced, awesome music - It did a lot of things right, even if the plot was a bit confusing, with the alternate universes, black holes and what not.

Something that puzzles the hell out of me is why did the sequel, Into Darkness, take so long? I know Abrams was busy with Super 8 but maybe he should have put that off (as much as I love that film) in favor of doing this. It probably would be doing better business at the box office and critics than it is doing now.

Now, in the event you are wondering if I'm attacking the film or am going to spew out negative thoughts on the film, let's get this out of the way:

I'm not.

While Into Darkness certainly has its problems, and we'll get to those latter, its a worthy sequel to the original and one of the most entertaining things I've seen this year. It still has all the elements I loved from the original with a few new things thrown in.

Set a few years after the original, the Federation has come under attack from a terrorist by the name of John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch), a former Starfleet officer out for revenge after he felt that Star command screwed him over in the worst ways possible. The crew of the Enterprise, led of course by Kirk n' Spock (Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, respectively), are sent in to take him down by orders of one Admiral Marcus (Peter Weller). But while the plot may seem simple, things are not as they seem.

I feel the need to get the bad stuff out of the way first, like in the same way a bratty child is forced to eat his vegetables before he can get to the good stuff. One of my main complaints of the film is that I feel it goes on for far too long. While Abrams's previous films have sported great pacing, Into Darkness kind of mess up a bit. There's filler in the movie that could have been seriously cut out and it would have been all the better for it, like bits where good ol Scotty (Simon Pegg) gets drunk off his ass or the bar scene between Kirk and Commander Pike (Bruce Greenwood and yes, I know its done to show their Father-Son-like relationship but it came off as forced).

Another thing that film does that bothers me is that it suffers from being unpredictable to predictable. There's some twists that caught me off guard but there's some stuff that can be seen a mile away. I think it may have to do with the fact that it had 3 screenwriters doing it, the first two being the scribes from the previous film Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman while the third scribe was divisive Prometheus and Lost writer Damon Lindelof. I always get this weird feeling like whenever Mr. Linelof is involved, the product always ends up spawning weird reactions with people. Eh, moving on.

As for the good stuff for the film, a lot of the things that made the first film great are still here. The visual effects and set design are better than ever, ranging from seeing things like an incredible fight in hyper-space in which we see all sorts of people flying out of the hull as things explode left and right, to the now famous scene in the trailers and advertisements where we see a Starfleet cruiser crash into a sprawling metropolis. Michael Giacchino's score is still nothing short of incredible, bringing out some true excitement and wonderment to the universe and some of the music is bound to get stuck in your head after its all over.

The performances across the board are quite good as well. Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto continue to show they have their characters down pat and never ceases to stop being amusing from watching them be bros one moment to bickering about the rules and personal approaches to how the current mission on hand should be accomplished. Or how Karl Urban, who will always be Judge Dredd in my mind from now on thanks to to the excellent 2012 adaptation, continues to be the best replacement for Bones McCoy, with his quips and grumpy attitude.

While some have had problems with the character of Dr. Carol Marcus, a doctor who pops up on the Enterprise under a different name (Don't worry: No spoilers), and her actress Alice Eve, I never really had a problem with her. I thought she did well with the material that was given to her, especially her scenes between her and Bones.

But special mention must go to Benedict Cumberbatch as Harrison. Charismatic, intimidating, fierce and methodical are just the few words to describe his villain. One moment, you can go from being fascinated and even wanting to see him defeated, to feeling incredibly sorry for the guy. Quite a performance here. He's a true threat and makes the villain of the previous film, Nero (Eric Bana), look like a chump. No disrespect to Mr. Bana, who played a very fun and dangerous villain, but you look like old stuff compared to Cumberbatch. Kinda funny how the guy who has a ship with the ability to create black holes looks less threatening than one man with superpowers.

One might ask me: "Is Into Darkness better than the original?" I cannot say no, as due to the problems I've mentioned here that were not or at least weren't as big in the 2009 reboot. Star Trek 2009 was incredibly fresh at the time and sadly, with this, some, if only a little of the polish has come off. But that's only minor. Both films are pretty much on the same plane, with Darkness coming up just a tad short.

Into Darkness is bound to piss people off, as with most "sacred" works in nerdom, like whatever Joss Whedon pumps out or live action adaptations of Anime (which always almost suck). But even with the problems that the film has, there's still a lot to like here. If you can get past the pacing issues and the predictability of the film, you're in for one fun summer movie.

Now that all that is said and done, two questions remain: How will Abrams take on Star Wars turn out and what will Paramount do with the next film in the Trek franchise? I've got high hopes for his take on SW, but I'm not sure what to think the next Trek film will turn out. I just hope they get someone who's just as confident and energetic as Abrams is.
6 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2024
Had this for a few years now, & people still are amazed when I take it out & reload the batteries.
Does all the neat stuff like the one in the film, except you have to imagine the actual beams coming out of it.
Loved the Blu ray disc, & still watch it every year. Fan stuff, I know, but who isn't a fan of a good sci fi story, & a cool prop!?
Beam this one up!

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Cliente Amazon
5.0 out of 5 stars tutto ok
Reviewed in Italy on April 20, 2024
Perfetto come da descrizione, arrivato anche in anticipo
Chris
5.0 out of 5 stars Arrived as promised
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 16, 2024
Arrived on time and good viewing
Overlook 237
5.0 out of 5 stars Star Trek Into Darkness 4K Ultra HD en Nederlands ondertiteld!
Reviewed in the Netherlands on February 5, 2023
Naar deze film, dat in mijn ogen de beste uit de nieuwe 3 Star Trek-films is, was ik al een flink poosje opzoek. Dat was nogal een lastige klus, want de Nederlandse uitgave was erg lastig te vinden en als ik hem vond was hij knetter duur.

Bij deze advertentie stond dat er Nederlandse ondertitels bij zaten, maar achterop het doosje staat dat dus niet op deze Scandinavische uitvoering van de film. Dus ik was een beetje huiverig dat ze misschien dat alleen bedoelde voor de bijgesloten Blu-ray en niet voor de 4K Blu-ray. Bij aankomst meteen in mijn X-Box gedaan en ik werd helemaal blij, want je kan meteen kiezen in welke taal je het menu wilt hebben.

En ‘s avonds heb ik meteen de film Nederlands ondertiteld gekeken en van genoten.
One person found this helpful
Report
FX de Vasselot
5.0 out of 5 stars Une suite très réussie au reboot de 2009, autant pour les fans que pour les néophytes.
Reviewed in France on August 26, 2013
Double avertissement. Tout d’abord, celui qui rédige ces lignes est un fan de Star Trek. Sans aller jusqu’à lire les romans annexes aux séries télé ou me déguiser avec des oreilles pointues, il me faut admettre un certain biais positif et exigent pour tout ce qui touche à cet univers, et reconnaître qu’il m’est impossible de me plonger totalement dans la peau d’un néophyte. Deuxièmement, je déconseille fortement à tout fin connaisseur de lire mon avant-dernier paragraphe (identifié « SPOILER ») s’il ne veut pas se gâcher quelques (bonnes) surprises du film liées à sa position dans l’univers Star Trek ; à l’inverse, pour les néophytes, ce passage vous apportera un éclairage supplémentaire que j’espère intéressant.

Je ne raconterai rien de l’intrigue. Autant vous laisser porter par le souffle de l’aventure devant l’écran. Sachez simplement qu’il y est question de complot, de manipulations, d’attentats terrestres, de combats spatiaux (liste non exhaustive). Autre enjeu pour Kirk : dans le film précédent, il accédait au grade de capitaine en partie par chance et en partie par son audace ; ici, il devra acquérir la maturité nécessaire pour devenir un « vrai » capitaine. L’histoire, linéaire, se suit avec plaisir, mais une fois la principale menace révélée vers les deux tiers du film, il faut reconnaître que les péripéties et rebondissements sont relativement classiques et prévisibles. Comprenez-moi bien : on passe un excellent moment, mais on pouvait espérer un surcroît d’inventivité de la part de J.J. Abrams, le créateur de Lost, le régénérateur de 
Mission Impossible au cinéma, et qui avait fait merveille en 2009 avec  l’opus précédent , sans parler de son petit bijou  Super 8 . En outre, si le ton du film gagne en gravité par rapport au premier volet, Star Trek into darkness est légèrement moins nerveux, tendu, haletant, bien que l’action ne soit pourtant pas en reste. L’humour, en revanche, n’a pas diminué : de nombreuses petites piques parsèment les dialogues et font mouche systématiquement.

Côté image, on en prend plein les yeux. Les effets spéciaux sont exemplaires, les visuels (les grandes villes terrestres du futur, notamment) magnifiques, les images de synthèses insérées à la perfection dans les plans et il n’y en a pas plus que nécessaire. Visuellement, parions que ça vieillira bien. Oui, les plans du pont restent saturés d’effets de « flare » qui lassent un peu, mais rien de grave : Abrams a finalement décidé d’assumer – tant mieux pour la cohérence visuelle de ses deux films. Cette cohérence se maintient également au niveau musical, puisque Michael Giacchino est de retour avec une partition se situant dans la rigoureuse continuité de ce qu’il avait composé en 2009, avec toujours quelques rappels du thème musical de la série d’origine. Le générique de fin est particulièrement frappant : il est construit sur l’exact modèle du précédent film.

Les acteurs assurent très proprement leurs prestations, mais il leur manque pour la plupart une complicité réelle d’équipage. On ne peut pas leur reprocher : une telle connivence ne se crée qu’après de longs mois voire années de tournage ensemble, comme c’est le cas pour une série télé. Il est vrai que la relation amicale Kirk-Spock commence à avoir de la substance mais pour les personnages un peu périphériques, c’est encore loin d’être le cas. Anton Yelchin, par exemple, est très sympathique en Chekov, mais sa complicité avec des personnages comme Sulu ou Scotty reste embryonnaire. Gageons que cela se mettra en place si la série des films continue. Du côté des méchants, en revanche, nous sommes très bien servis. Benedict Cumberbatch (Sherlock, l’excellente série de la BBC) apporte une remarquable complexité à son personnage de John Harrison. Il est assurément menaçant, mais humain (ses motivations sont compréhensibles) et loyal (il n’a qu’une parole et n’est jamais gratuitement sadique). Sa voix adopte un timbre très grave, ainsi qu’une diction lente et parfaitement intelligible, son corps ne fait jamais un geste qui ne soit utile ou calculé, son regard est fixe, glacial, ne cligne jamais, tout cela confère au personnage une aura de détermination inflexible et surhumaine. L’autre méchant du film n’est pas en reste, mais je ne m’étendrai pas dessus pour ne pas vous gâcher l’histoire. Là où l’intrigue de ce deuxième volet est légèrement moins enlevée et haletante que le précédent, les méchants font, eux, largement oublier un Néro qui était pourtant déjà très respectable. Ils sont l’un des grands atouts du film.

J’en arrive à mon paragraphe qui, j’espère, intéressera les néophytes mais sera PLEIN DE GROS SPOILERS POUR LES FANS (vous êtes prévenus !). Quant Abrams s’est mis à Star Trek en 2009, il a clairement annoncé qu’il ferait un reboot complet, c'est-à-dire qu’il repartirait de l’équipage de la série d’origine (3 saisons entre 1966 et 1969). Mais vu l’intégrisme d’un grand nombre de fans de l’univers, sur le soutien et le bouche-à-oreille desquels la Paramount comptait beaucoup pour la promotion de ses films, Abrams ne pouvait se permettre d’ignorer complètement ce qui avait été mis en place avant lui. A savoir : la série d’origine mais aussi comme les six films qui en furent tirés (entre 1979 et 1991) avec les mêmes personnages. En particulier, Star Trek 2 la colère de Khan (1982) est unanimement reconnu comme étant le meilleur film Star Trek de cette période, voire tout court. Abrams allait-il oui ou non oser en faire un remake (quelque chose d’aussi osé que de vouloir refaire disons Les dents de la mer ou L’empire contre-attaque) ? Allait-on reprendre le mythique et terrifiant Khan (fantastique Ricardo Montalban) ? Soyons brefs : oui, ils ont osé. Évidemment, cela laissera un néophyte tout à fait froid, mais ne soyez pas surpris d’entendre au cinéma un certain nombre d’exclamations venant des fans : ils sont passés en mode « exégèse comparative ». En effet, de nombreux éléments du film et de l’épisode « Space seed » (qui lui est lié) ont été repris, allant de certaines lignes de dialogues à des scènes entières (notamment la mythique scène du réacteur), en passant par plusieurs personnages annexes (comme Carol Marcus, ou les compagnons de Khan). Et pourtant, ce n’est pas le même film, ce n’est pas la même intrigue, ce ne sont pas les mêmes enjeux. Abrams est parvenu à s’approprier le personnage sans le trahir, et à la placer au cœur d’une intrigue à la fois nouvelle et respectueuse de l’univers Star Trek. En tant que néophyte, vous pouvez parfaitement voir le film sans savoir tout ce que je viens de vous raconter. Mais vous pouvez également beaucoup y gagner si vous prenez le temps de regarder auparavant « Space seed » (dans la saison 1 de la série d’origine) puis « Star Trek 2 la colère de Khan ». Soyons clairs : l’épisode a mal vieilli, son histoire est un peu naïve, les décors sont en carton-pâte de deuxième choix et le jeu des acteurs est désuet. Mais Khan et ses compagnons y sont très bien introduits. Le film, quant à lui, a très bien vieilli (bravo aux effets spéciaux d’ILM, encore très beaux 30 ans plus tard), et son intrigue inspirée de Moby Dick (Khan poursuit Kirk de sa soif inextinguible de vengeance) est toujours magnifiquement menée. Et, au final, le Khan d’origine reste inoubliable. Cumberbatch a beau être bon acteur, il n’éclipse pas son modèle. Abrams a beau être bon scénariste, il n’égale pas la pureté et l’efficacité du screenplay de Nicholas Meyer. Oui le remake est très bon, il parvient à incorporer des éléments de l’épisode et du film d’origine, mais n’en égale pas complètement le souffle épique.

Résumons : Abrams signe une suite très réussie à son film de 2009, un tout petit peu moins haletant que celui-ci, mais avec de meilleurs méchants. La mise en scène est sans défaut et les acteurs très compétents. La 3D est belle mais pas forcément indispensable. Même si vous êtes néophyte, vous pourrez l’apprécier. Ne vous en privez donc pas !
50 people found this helpful
Report
paleo27
5.0 out of 5 stars Version française
Reviewed in France on April 29, 2024
Bel et bien en français ! Ne pas se fier à la pochette suèdoise !