Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Select delivery location

GRADO SR125e Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 159 ratings

Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Brand Grado
Model Name SR125e
Form Factor Over Ear
Connectivity Technology Wired
Special Feature lightweight

Compare with similar items

This Item
GRADO SR125e Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones
GRADO SR125e Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones
Recommendations
GRADO SR125x Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones
dummy
GRADO SR225x Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones
dummy
GRADO SR60x Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones
dummy
GRADO SR80x Prestige Series Wired Open Back Stereo Headphones
dummy
GRADO Reference Series RS1x Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
PriceCurrently unavailable.$175.00$225.00$99.00$125.00$750.00
Delivery
Get it as soon as Friday, May 17
Get it as soon as Friday, May 17
Get it as soon as Friday, May 17
Get it as soon as Friday, May 17
Get it as soon as Monday, May 20
Customer Ratings
Sound quality
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
Comfort
4.0
3.8
3.0
4.0
3.9
Noise cancellation
2.2
2.5
2.1
2.1
2.7
Value for money
4.5
3.5
4.2
4.3
Sold By
4OurEars - The Official Grado Store
4OurEars - The Official Grado Store
4OurEars - The Official Grado Store
4OurEars - The Official Grado Store
4OurEars - The Official Grado Store
connectivity tech
Wired
Wired
Wired
Wired
Wired
Wired
headphones form factor
Over Ear
On Ear
On Ear
On Ear
On Ear
Over Ear
connector type
3.5mm Jack
Wired
Wired
3.5mm Jack w/1/4" adapter
Wired
3.5mm Jack
headphones jack
3.5mm with 1/4" adapter
3.5mm Jack and 6.3mm adapter
3.5mm with 1/4" adapter
3.5 mm Jack
cable feature
Retractable
Retractable
Retractable
Retractable
Retractable
Retractable
material
Copper
Copper
Copper
Copper
Copper
model name
SR125e
SR125x
Grado SR225x
SR60x
Grado SR80x
Reference RS1x

Looking for specific info?

Product information

Feedback

GRADO SR125e Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones

GRADO SR125e Prestige Series Wired Open-Back Stereo Headphones


Found a lower price? Let us know. Although we can't match every price reported, we'll use your feedback to ensure that our prices remain competitive.

Where did you see a lower price?

Fields with an asterisk * are required

/
/
/
/
Please sign in to provide feedback.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
159 global ratings

Customers say

Customers like the clarity, quality and balance of the headphones. They mention that they provide additional clarity and detail, and are fantastic. They also appreciate the value for money. However, some customers are mixed on weight, comfort, and construction.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

83 customers mention64 positive19 negative

Customers like the sound quality of the headphones. They mention that it has great sound, accurate bass, fantastic detail, and seperate sounds. They also say it's a superior listening experience, with warm harmonic colors, rich full bodied vocals, excellent dynamics, and the bass can be pushed up.

"...Voodoo record, you instantly hear great stereo imaging, a punchy, accurate bass, creamy miss, and a smooth top end...." Read more

"...The have all of the tight bass punch I need in that jazz drum beat and bass strumming while maintaining the utterly crisp and detailed mids and..." Read more

"...a sound that is pure Grado, with warm harmonic colors, rich full bodied vocals, excellent dynamics, and an ultra-smooth top end." on all SR-x25..." Read more

"...The Grado SR125 is a little more expensive, and produces a wider soundstage, with bass sounding a little more refined and deeper and highs a bit..." Read more

28 customers mention25 positive3 negative

Customers like the quality of the headphones. They say they are fantastic, great, and perfect for programming. They also say the headband is much improved and the cable is incredible.

"...but the vast majority went to phenomenal sound quality and an incredible cable...." Read more

"...The headband is much improved (thank god). Pictures somehow don't accurately describe it...." Read more

"...Mind blowing good! Literally hearing things I never noticed before in songs I've heard hundreds of times. They are also very comfortable for me...." Read more

"...Followed that with a Chopin piano concerto and it was magnificent, each piano stroke clear and crisp...." Read more

16 customers mention16 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the value of the headphones. They say it's very nice for the money, the best audio value per dollar, and they're surprised at the excellent quality at this price point.

"...'s for $50 bucks less if you need to save, but they really are worth the money." Read more

"...If you are looking for audiophile sound at a very reasonable price, then the Grado Prestige Series, and the SR125i, is an excellent choice,..." Read more

"...Grado phones, and I am pleasantly surprised at their excellent quality at this price point...." Read more

"Wonderful Sound at reasonable price.This is the second pair of Grado Cans I have owned...." Read more

12 customers mention12 positive0 negative

Customers say the headphones are well balanced in many music genres, excellent for classical music, and add a new dimension to their music. They also mention that the headphones do not have any sibilance and are well rounded.

"...The SR125es handle this eclectic mix of genres with aplomb...." Read more

"...on just one track recording of the song; for example: backup singers become well defined like they are in a space all on their own, separate from..." Read more

"...They are not nearly as bright as when new. Everything is balanced very nicely. The bass response is exceptional. Not overblown or pumped up...." Read more

"...Overall, I like the 125es better because they feel more balanced...." Read more

9 customers mention9 positive0 negative

Customers are satisfied with the clarity of the Grado headphones. They mention that the sound is analytical with a high amount of detail. They are happy with the significant improvements in detail, coherence, musicality, and clarity. They also say that the headphones allow them to hear lots of little details that were not present before.

"...something since the bass and mids on the Momentums are smooth and clear with an astonishingly good soundstage for completely closed in over-the-ear..." Read more

"...The L-cushions increase the intimacy further, providing additional clarity and making details in the music are easier to hear...." Read more

"...With these headphones you will hear lots of little details that were not present before and the sound is just so much more vibrant overall...." Read more

"...Let me qualify that. They have a bass response (tight and detailed) and I like the that...." Read more

36 customers mention18 positive18 negative

Customers are mixed about the comfort of the headphones. Some mention it takes a bit of time to break in but it feels more comfortable once it does, they like the feel and the look of them. The open air ear muffs are great, while others say that the stock ear pads are quite uncomfortable, feel pressing on the ears, and feel a little unnatural.

"...I can wear them for several hours and not get sore ears. Overal probably the best headphones I've ever bought.*UPDATE*7/18/18..." Read more

"...It just feels pressing on the ears.Fourth, these are incredibly good looking headphones...." Read more

"...That wrap is extremely well sewn, adds a nice degree of extra comfort - the Velcro is insanely strong...." Read more

"...Well, when you first get them, the headband might be a bit tight; it loosens up over time...." Read more

24 customers mention11 positive13 negative

Customers are mixed about the weight of the headphones. Some mention that they aren't too heavy, the cable is thicker than the cable on their old headphones, and the aluminum adds weight to the headphones, but it feels good. Others say that the wires are pretty thick and heavy, making them awkward to wear for activities.

"...The headphones are light, and the cable is thicker than the cable on my old SR80s...." Read more

"...The cable to the headphones is thick and a bit stiff at first. It will also lose its tendency to not want to uncurl...." Read more

"...The headphones have a lot of plastic but the cord is quite thick and durable. Sound quality is a different story...." Read more

"...port, but the 1/4" adapter is thicker than it looks and makes the cord much heavier, making the situation worse.PS==..." Read more

23 customers mention11 positive12 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the construction of the headphones. Some mention that they are durable with a sturdy leather headband, while others say that they feel cheaply made and fragile.

"...The headphone cable is very thick, but sturdy. I feel like I need to be careful not to put too much stress on a 1/8" phone port...." Read more

"...This was not aided by the very cheap metal strip that serves as the headband, but really just rests on one point on the top of the head...." Read more

"...They have held up well, although the Y connector has become twisted and frayed...." Read more

"...Nope, they are made in China, the build quality is seriously lacking and I suspect that they would break as quickly as the cheap ones...." Read more

Amazing sound quality, exactly what I wanted
5 Stars
Amazing sound quality, exactly what I wanted
I have both Bose and plantronics cans with noise cancelling capability. These Grado are not that thing. These are excellent listening phones. I’m the comfort of my own home listening to music, or playing along on guitar these Grado’s are IMO superior sound quality.I personally really like the retro looks and feel.I also love they are a family firm based in Brooklyn.One has to reconcile that as such they are operating in a very challenging global market place where labour and parts can be much cheaper abroad, and as such have to make economies in the build to be affordable/competitive. The fact that they manage to make a range with 3 versions of the prestige series between $80 and $150 is testament to that effort. After doing a lot of research and reading reviews, these sr125s seemed to offer best bang for buck in my price range.They sound so good that my wife is now insisting on a pair - the open backs on these really bring out parts in music and songs that you rarely hear these days of wireless and NC. Both of those technologies have their place, I’m not a Luddite, but for crystal clear listening pleasure these take some beating for me.I did find the vinyl wrap around the head strap a little sharp on the edges, and was worried it might cut into the wires when stored (I assume it’s a metal band under there). You can see the crimped edge in the second photo. My solution to that problem is an $18 headphone wrap from US tactical sewing (available on Amazon), in a small range of colours/designs - most with a subtle camo design but some just plain. Bonus there is that’s also helping a small business. That wrap is extremely well sewn, adds a nice degree of extra comfort - the Velcro is insanely strong. Also adds a d-ring to the cans for easy hanging.I will be buying another set for my wife, as possible one of the fancier sets grado makes next time I’m feeling extra flush.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2017
The Grado SR125e headphones are a nearly perfect headphone for me. The have all of the tight bass punch I need in that jazz drum beat and bass strumming while maintaining the utterly crisp and detailed mids and upper register for which Grado is so famous. This is all within the context of a slightly warmer sound over the SR80s (which have a slightly warmer sound than the 60s). Mind you, I’ve yet to find a pair of Grados that I don’t like, but they do improve at each price point so that, at least for these three, they seem the best value of their respective price points for quiet listening.

They are, after all, open air, hence the wonderfully large sound stage. So, sound seeps out and into the headsets. When I need to close off the world, I go to my Sennheiser Momentum’s (see Cans: A Personal Journey Through Soundscapes for more on the Sennheisers) and for more mobility I use LG Platinum Tones with Comply Sport Earphone tips (see LG Tone Platinum Tone Brings the Clarity and Detail, Comply Sport Earphone Tips make Your Workout Bassalicous for more on these).

I have loved the Grado line ever since my first pair of SR60s which I bought a little over eight years ago. The hallmark of Grado headphones is clarity and detail combined with an open sound stage. The SR 60s bring exactly that. There is nothing that touches them in that price range. If they are so good, why move up? Two reasons: the supporting base is reasonable but it lacks oomph and the overall tenor of the sound is a little analytic. I prefer something slightly warmer. The SR125es bring all the richness with tight bass while keeping that sparkling clarity and penchant for detail. The also are relatively easily driven, so, while an amp will help these, they don’t require one. I mostly listen to them with my LG V20 phone which sports an ESS Quad DAC that can push 32 bit / 384 kHz sound with a solid amp. Much of my music is FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) files ripped from CDs in the standard 44.1 kHz, 16-bit mode. I also have some lossless WMA files, 320 mp3, 256 mp3 and a smattering of others. However, I also have a mix of HD music (from HDTracks) ranging from 24 bit / 44.1 kHz to 24 bit / 192. I also traverse from classical orchestra and string quartet to jazz to electronica and mashups (think Lindsey Stirling’s dubstep pieces). The SR125es handle this eclectic mix of genres with aplomb. I would also say that the bass is slightly tighter than my Sennheiser Momentum as well a more detailed mids. That’s saying something since the bass and mids on the Momentums are smooth and clear with an astonishingly good soundstage for completely closed in over-the-ear (circumaural) headphones.

What do you need to know about owning these? Well, when you first get them, the headband might be a bit tight; it loosens up over time. The cable to the headphones is thick and a bit stiff at first. It will also lose its tendency to not want to uncurl. It’s also permanently attached to the headphones, so if it breaks (unlikely with this set), you’ll need to send them in. I did this once with my SR60s; they were quick and the repair was reasonable. On par with a new set of cables. While breaking them in may improve them, they sound great right out of the box. As I indicated above, they need a relatively quiet environment but in such, your $150 will be well rewarded.

I cannot recommend these enough.

See joesgeekfest on Wordpress for more detail.
10 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2014
Updated: 2-1-2015

I listened to each Prestige headphone for at least 10 hours. The music I listened to was compressed in Apple Lossless format. I used my MacBook Pro with iTunes for playback. The differences in sound quality noted in this review were also heard on my iPod Classic with music compressed in AAC format at 256kbps VBR quality (iTunes Plus).

The Grado Prestige Series
===================
I've done hours and hours of research about the Grado Prestige Series. The following points lead me to initially purchase the SR-125.
- Numerous forums indicated that the SR-325 was too bright and caused listening fatigue.
- Although numerous forums recommended the SR-225 instead of the SR-125, a review from goodcans.com said that the difference between the SR-225 and SR-125 was noticeable only in certain songs and required well-trained ears.
- The Grado website advertises "The SRx25 will produce a sound that is pure Grado, with warm harmonic colors, rich full bodied vocals, excellent dynamics, and an ultra-smooth top end." on all SR-x25 headphones, which indicates that the SR-225 and SR-325 are refinements to the original SR-125 (original by order of price).

Below is the list comparing the headphones in the Prestige series and the Reference series. Please note that I have only listened to the SR-80i, SR-125e, SR-225e, and SR-325e. I relied on data from my research for the following differences: SR-60 vs SR-80, SR325 vs RS2, RS2 vs RS1.

SR-60 - entry level
SR-80 - improved bass
SR-125 - improved separation of horizontal sounds with a wider soundstage, more intimate soundstage
SR-225 - improved reproduction of space with a deeper soundstage, more intimate soundstage
SR-325 - improved look and feel, punchier bass
RS-2 - improved accuracy (warmer) with a smooth top end
RS-1 - improved look and feel, deeper and more intimate soundstage

-Prestige Buying Recommendations-

The SR-80 sounds really good for its price, but if you want a taste of the detail you've been missing without spending too much money, try the SR-125. The SR-325 is the real treat of the Prestige Series. It reveals even more detail than the SR-125, has an addictive bass, and a "look and feel" to be cherished. If you don't care much for "look and feel", the SR-225 will provide you more value.

-Reference Buying Recommendations-

The Reference series is notable for its warmer sound and smooth top end. The warmer sound will help instruments (like brass) and vocals sound more life-like. Those interested in Jazz and Classical music should give these serious consideration.

-Comparing the Top of each Line-

Prestige (SR-80) = Value Series
Prestige (SR-325) = Original Series (Improved Detail)
Reference (RS-1) = Prestige + Warmer Sound
Statement (GS-1000) = Reference + Bigger Soundstage
Professional (PS-1000) = Statement + Neutral Response

SR-80i vs SR-125e
==============
While some forums say that there is little difference between the SR-80 and SR-125, I disagree. When going from the SR-125 to the SR-80, there are obvious differences.

There is a much wider soundstage with the SR-125. Imagine a sector of a circle whose central point is at the back of the listener's head and the arc length is at the front. This area illustrates the space for sources of sound. The central angle would determine the soundstage width. The SR-80 would have a central angle of 110° while the SR-125 would have a central angle of 180°. For example, a sound that only plays on the left phone would sound like it's coming from the point 55° left of center with the SR-80. On the SR-125, it would sound like it's coming from the point 90° left of center.

The wider soundstage and improved intimacy result in more accurate sound with sufficient space for good separation of sound sources. In some songs, I can focus on just one track recording of the song; for example: backup singers become well defined like they are in a space all on their own, separate from the other sounds, as if there were recorded separately and then mixed in at that location (which is what happened). The SR-125 reveals this other dimension of production: how much work was put in the stereo mixing of the song. I have found that not all songs have such interesting production.

These improvements also make defects in the recording (hiss, pops, and clipping) less subtle.

I had to get used to such a wide soundstage provided by the SR-125. In the beginning, it felt like a different experience. Sometimes, I found it difficult to focus on the music as a whole because I felt bombarded with what seemed like stereo sources 180° apart. It seemed to require work to piece the sources together and felt a bit unnatural. Early Beatles albums in pseudo stereo were dreadful to listen to. More than ever, they became like listening to two completely different sources (which they are).

However, I found it more difficult to go back to the less intimate sound of the SR-80. The sounds become so distant that it no longer seemed like I was in the same room with the band, but maybe looking through a window. Now, I am used to the wide soundstage.

Another thing I read in some forums was that the SR-125 has less bass than the SR-80. I think that because of the improvements, the bass has to compete with the other sounds that now come into focus with the SR-125, which makes the bass seem more inconspicuous.

SR-125e vs Other Headphones
=======================
Interestingly, the difference in width of soundstage is not as obvious in other headphones I have such as the Koss PortaPro or the Sennheiser HD280 Pro. However, their sound quality is closer to, but not as good as the SR-80.

SR-125e vs SR-225e
===============

The SR-225 comes with L-cushions instead of the S-cushions that come with the SR-125. The difference in sound quality between the SR-125 and SR-225 is not as impactful as the difference between the SR-80 and SR-125, but I was surprised to hear that even more intimacy was possible.

The L-cushions increase the intimacy further, providing additional clarity and making details in the music are easier to hear. Vocals come closer to your ears. The reverberations of the lightly tapped cymbals are more easily heard; they can also be heard for bass drums. These reverberations give the sound a more musical feel. In addition, bass seems to be easier to isolate. When switching back and forth between the S-cushion and L-cushion, the intimacy is immediately noticeable; the details are easily noticeable in slower songs.

The SR-225 also has a slightly wider soundstage, but it's difficult to detect.

The headphones are slightly heavier, probably due to the larger chamber and different grille.

I enjoyed the increased intimacy of the SR-225. Again, once I had more intimacy, it was difficult to go back to the SR-125.

*No headphone amplifier was used for this experience. See section: The Case for a Headphone Amplifier.
*Also see section: Infamous L-cushions.

SR-225e vs SR-325e
===============

With the SR-325, we enter the area of diminishing returns with regard to sound quality. The SR-325e has a warmer tone - it's difficult to detect. There is also a punchier bass - can be detected, but not significant. I had to listen to songs back and forth at least a handful of times to understand some of the differences I was hearing. It also helps to be in a quiet environment and use quiet, slow songs in some cases.

The best thing about the SR-325 is the improvements to the look and feel of the line. The headphones are numbered (carved on the ear pad side of the chamber). The chambers are made of aluminum and painted silver. The aluminum adds weight to the headphones, but it feels good. The headband is much improved (thank god). Pictures somehow don't accurately describe it. It is wider by 1/4", made of stitched leather with a rigid paperboard inside to support its shape, and lightly padded on the underside.

However, I do have some complaints about the look and feel. There were a few small defects in the paint. A small piece chipped on the first day. The exterior nubs of the plastic piece that holds the cans to the headband were not the same size. These issues might have been caused by the struggle to meet the spike in demand caused by the introduction of the E series headphones.

While I'm not sure the SR-325 is worth the full premium over the SR-225, it was difficult to give up the aluminum chambers and sturdy leather headband once I had them in my hands.

*No headphone amplifier was used for this experience. See section: The Case for a Headphone Amplifier.
*Also see sections: Infamous L-cushions, Long-Term Listening to the SR-325.

Long-Term Listening to the SR-325
=========================
I've been listening to these exclusively for about 3 months. During this time, I noticed some things.

Over time, the SR-325 developed a liquid smooth, airy bass thump (the so-called "punchy" bass). This gives an addictive quality to music. Just listen to the intro of Pink Floyd's Breathe in the Air... or Carpenter's Mr. Guder. It's so blissful; yet, such a tease because it leaves me wanting more. This "punchy" bass alone motivated me to upgrade to higher-end headphones (GS-1000).

I also noticed that I've been gravitating towards different music. I cherish music that was recorded better. Slow music that I previously thought was boring now became exciting. On the other hand, music with ambience, that I previously thought was exciting, became less exciting.

*No headphone amplifier was used for this experience. See section: The Case for a Headphone Amplifier.

The Infamous L-Cushions
===================

The L-cushions provide the biggest upgrade to the base sound quality of the SR-125e than the other upgrades that make up the SR-225e or SR-325e.

If the SR-125 was also shipped with L-cushions, the differences would be as follows.

SR-125 - base sound
SR-225 - slightly wider soundstage, slightly improved accuracy (warmer)
SR-325 - improved look and feel, slightly punchier bass, slightly improved accuracy (warmer)

Owners of the SR-125 may be tempted to buy L-cushions to get better sound. However, I found the sound to be too bright to enjoy for extended periods. Thus, revealing the greatest strength of the SR-225: not too bright with the L-cushions.

If you are looking to experiment with the S-cushion or L-cushion: moving to the L-cushion increases the brightness of the sound, which improves intimacy and tightens the bass (more defined); moving to the S-cushion decreases brightness, which reduces intimacy and loosens the bass (more boomy).

*No headphone amplifier was used for this experience. See section: The Case for a Headphone Amplifier.

The infamous drawback of the L-cushions is their comfort. When I used the L-cushions for the first time with the SR-225e, they were very uncomfortable to wear for more than 15 minutes. On some days it was not so bad, but repeated wearing made a bad situation worse. Even hours after I stopped listening, I would feel the pressure points on my ears. Below are tips on how to make them more comfortable.

- Rest the cushion on the upper tip of each ear. The biggest cause of my discomfort was caused by the upper tips of my ears rubbing against the driver. I discovered that the cushions became more comfortable when I rested them on the upper tip of each ear. This may change the sound. However, Grado has said that the best way to wear them is the most comfortable way. I also try to keep the headphone label buttons where my ear canal is so that the sound isn't affected too much.

- Loosen the headband. Loosening the headband will help by reducing the clamping force of these cushions on your ears. However, you will be shifting more weight of the phones to the headband. If it is not padded like the SR-325, the headband will become uncomfortable with too much weight.

- Don't move too much. Even with clamping force, these cushions do not have much grip on your ears, so they will shift easily when you tilt your head or widen facial expressions. The shifting increases discomfort. Try to use the headphones only while your body is in an upright position (ex: not lying down).

Using the the above tips, I can go 1 hour without needing to readjust the headphones. That's not as comfortable as the S-cushions, which I can wear for more than 2 hours without issue, but it is bearable.

The Case for a Headphone Amplifier
=========================

Headphone amplifiers built into devices such as iPods and computers are designed with power limitations driven by two goals: small footprint; safe universal operation. Unfortunately, high end headphones typically require lots of power to sound their best. They might sound OK without one, but they could sound much different when connected to a good headphone amplifier.

I was skeptical at first, until I bought Grado's GS-1000 and was disappointed by its bass performance. When I called Grado about this, they said that a headphone amplifier would help with bass performance. I picked one up and was blown away. Not only did the bass improve to a satisfactory level, but the soundstage completely transformed. It felt like another headphone. I was so impressed by the improvements that I had to try the amplifier with other headphones.

With the SR-325, the bass and soundstage was improved to satisfactory levels. The bass became louder, rounder, and smoother. The soundstage felt more spacious as instrument reverberations occupied more space, significantly improving the reproduction of ambience. The difference wasn't as dramatic as with the GS-1000, but the improvements are enough for me to justify making a headphone amplifier a requirement for the SR-325.

I no longer have an SR-225, but I expect improvements similar to the SR-325.

With the SR-125, the same improvements were noticed. The bass became slightly louder, rounder, and smoother. The soundstage became more spacious, mildly improving the reproduction of ambience. The difference is not as dramatic was with the SR-325. I would say that a headphone amplifier is not a requirement, but it would improve your experience with the SR-125.

With the SR-80, there were slight improvements, but not enough to justify buying a headphone amplifier.

*Note that headphones have to be broken-in to see the maximum benefit of a headphone amplifier.

Unfortunately, not all headphone amplifiers perform the same way. A headphone amplifier's job is not just to supply additional power, but also not imprint itself onto the audio signal while doing so. That's the challenge. The JDS Labs Objective2 is my reference headphone amplifier. I've compared it against the Fiio E12 and the Denon DA-10 and the Objective2 provided the best performance. You can check out my reviews for the E12 and DA-10 if you need more specifics.

*Note that a Gain of 1x (or 0dB) is perfect for Grado headphones and the Line Out of an iPod Classic (6G). However, this is different for Media Players without a line out, such as the iPod Touch (6G). In this case, I set the Headphone Out to 75% volume and use a Gain of 2.5x (or 7.5dB). With the efficient GR10e, a Gain of 2.5x gives me use of 50% of the headphone amplifier's volume knob for songs with a dynamic range of 14 dB. With the less efficient GS1000e, it gives me use of 75% of the volume knob.

Other Considerations
================
Since the headphones are open back, music can be easily heard by others and external sounds can be easily heard by you. External sounds will interfere with your perception of bass performance. This is typical of other sound sources open to the environment, such as car speakers.

The phone plug is 1/8" (fits in iPod) and comes with a 1/4" adapter.

The headphone cable is very thick, but sturdy. I feel like I need to be careful not to put too much stress on a 1/8" phone port. The 1/4" to 1/8" adapter from Grado may look like a solution to prevent stress on a 1/8" phone port, but the 1/4" adapter is thicker than it looks and makes the cord much heavier, making the situation worse.

PS
==
Relaxed, intimate, and emotional songs sound better with more intimacy. Examples:
K's Choice - Not an Addict
Spandau Ballet - True
Spice Girls - 2 become 1
Sting - Fields of Gold

Glossary
======
- Accurate - A more accurate sound means a better balance of all frequencies, resulting in conspicuous details.
- Brighter - A brighter sound is one with more treble.
- Intimate - A more intimate sound is one that sounds closer to your ears. This usually feels like the artist is playing for just you, rather than for an audience.
- Muddy - A muddy sound is one that does not have clarity. This can be caused by inaccurate sound reproduction or narrow soundstage.
- Soundstage - A soundstage is the amount of 3-dimensional space available for sound sources. A bigger soundstage will provide more separation between the track recordings of a song, which helps a listener to focus on each one individually. In addition, a bigger soundstage also increases the amount of perceived space around the listener.
- Soundstage Width - Imagine a sector of a circle whose central point is at the back of the listener's head and the arc length is at the front. This area illustrates the space for sources of sound. The central angle would determine the soundstage width.
- Soundstage Depth - This relates to Soundstage Width in that the radius of the sector would determine the soundstage depth. However, because of headphone design, the final shape may not resemble that of a sector.
- Warmer - A warmer sound is one with less treble and/or more bass. Warmer sound can be easily detected when listening to female vocals. Other sounds that are usually bright, such as cymbals are also a good point of detection.
665 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
KiwiVda
5.0 out of 5 stars Fasntastiche
Reviewed in Italy on April 7, 2018
Non c'e molto da dire sono strepitose. Se siete fanatici delle cuffie aperte non potete non averne un paio. io le uso anche in montagna come paraorecchie musicali e non perdono un colpo. Le piloto o dal Samsung Note 8 o dalla Aus Xonar Essence STX o dal Rega Ear. Sono sempre ottime.
4 people found this helpful
Report
Moninick
5.0 out of 5 stars Lo stato dell'arte
Reviewed in Italy on March 18, 2016
Ciao a tutti! Difficile non essere stupiti da queste meravigliose cuffie.. Parto dicendo che non sono cuffie adatte da un amante dei bassi e dell'isolamento più totale, perchè il suono che riproducono (testato in Flac da un riproduttore Hi-Fi) è una melodia perfettamente riprodotta, bilanciata ed equilibrata. con una dinamica pazzesca, che non enfatizza nessuna frequenza in particolare, ma che anzi, fa della neutralità e della purezza il suo punto forte. Senza un file flac e un riproduttore adatto non si apprezza tutta la qualità disponibile, certamente anche il cellulare più di bassa lega riesce a farle muovere, ma vi assicuro che non serve a niente un paio di cuffie del genere se non si ha tutto "l'impianto" di livello. Assodato quanto detto prima, passiamo alla comodità, i padiglioni in dotazione sono comodi, non scaldano troppo e non schiacciano la testa, io riesco a fare anche 3 ore consecutive con queste Grado, e anche a volumi alti non affaticano perchè tutte le frequenze riprodotte non "sparano" mai più delle altre e quindi non sarete mai intontiti da bassi esuberanti, da alti gracchianti, o da medi nasali. L'effetto "apple" è totale, i materiali sono premium, la pelle che ricopre l'arco superiore è morbida e di sostanza e i padiglioni esterni non sfigurano davanti a nulla, il cavo è della giusta sezione e anche i jack finali (è presente l'adattatore per i 6mm) sono di qualità e di sostanza. Con queste cuffie potrete veramente giudicare con estrema neutralità il mixaggio e il master del disco che state ascoltando e vi renderete conto di quali autori prestano attenzione ai dettagli e di quali registrano e mixano con patate carote ed ortaggi vari. Questo è un difetto da un certo punto di vista, perchè se ascolterete una cantantucola pop attuale vi renderete conto degli effetti e dell'autotune a manetta che va in voga in questi anni, e questo, vi farà cadere tantissimi miti XD!!!! Fortunatamente non è il mio caso, perchè fortunatamente non ascolto certa roba. Scherzi a parte, grazie a queste grado riesco ad apprezzare tutto, il charleston suonato con spazzole o con bacchette, il basso suonato con plettro, dita, slap, la chitarra che monta una certa dimensione di corde, o la voce che vibra, soffia, urla, scende e sale, il tutto condito da suoni di contorno (appunto per chi maniacalmente arricchisce i suoi brani) che perfettamente sposano ogni canzone... Sentirete gli archi grattare le corde, i fiati che giocano con il soffio, le diverse sonorità delle percussioni in base alla tipologia di materiale ecc In definitiva, consiglio l'acquisto agli amanti della perfezione sonora, della dinamica e della neutralità della musica registrata.
10 people found this helpful
Report