Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.

GIGABYTE X470 AORUS Gaming 7 WIFI (AMD Ryzen AM4/ X470/ Intel Wave 2 WIFI/ M.2) Motherboard

4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars 293 ratings

To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later.

About this item

  • Supports AMD Ryzen 2nd Generation/ Ryzen with Radeon Vega Gaphics/ Ryzen 1st Generation
  • Dual Channel ECC/ Non-ECC Unbuffered DDR4, 4 DIMMs
  • 10+2 Phase IR Digital PWM Design
  • Fins-Array Heatsink & Direct Touch Heatpipe
  • 2-Way CrossFire/ SLI Graphics Support with Dual Armor and Ultra Durable Design
Basket stuffers for under $5 at Fresh
Get ready for Easter Learn more

Important information

To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.

Top Brand: GIGABYTE

Highly Rated
4.4/5 star rating from 100K+ customer ratings
Trending
100K+ orders for this brand in past 3 months
Low Returns
Customers usually keep items from this brand

Compare with similar items

This Item
GIGABYTE X470 AORUS Gaming 7 WIFI (AMD Ryzen AM4/ X470/ Intel Wave 2 WIFI/ M.2) Motherboard
GIGABYTE X470 AORUS Gaming 7 WIFI (AMD Ryzen AM4/ X470/ Intel Wave 2 WIFI/ M.2) Motherboard
Recommendations
ASUS TUF Gaming A520M-PLUS (WiFi) AMD AM4 (3rd Gen Ryzen™) microATX Motherboard (M.2 Support, 802.11ac Wi-Fi, DisplayPort, HDMI, D-Sub, USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A and Aura Addressable Gen 2 headers)
dummy
MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk MAX WiFi Gaming Motherboard (AMD AM4, DDR4, PCIe 4.0, SATA 6Gb/s, M.2, USB 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI/DP, ATX, Wi-Fi 6E, AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Processors)
dummy
Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming WiFi II AMD AM4 (3rd Gen Ryzen) ATX Motherboard (PCIe 4.0,WiFi 6E, 2.5Gb LAN, BIOS Flashback, HDMI 2.1, Addressable Gen 2 RGB Header and Aura Sync)
dummy
MSI Performance Gaming AMD Ryzen 2ND and 3rd Gen AM4 M.2 USB 3 DDR4 DVI HDMI Crossfire ATX Motherboard (B450 GAMING PLUS Max)
dummy
ASUS AM4 TUF Gaming X570-Plus (Wi-Fi) AM4 Zen 3 Ryzen 5000 & 3rd Gen Ryzen ATX Motherboard with PCIe 4.0, Dual M.2, 12+2 with Dr. MOS Power Stage
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
PriceCurrently unavailable.-10% $89.99
List:$99.99
-6% $169.99
List:$179.99
$189.99$99.99$192.99
Delivery
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 17
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 17
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 17
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 17
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 17
Customer Ratings
Value for money
3.9
4.4
4.2
4.3
4.2
Stability
3.3
4.3
4.6
4.1
4.1
For gaming
4.2
4.7
4.4
4.3
4.0
Tech Support
4.0
4.4
4.0
4.2
3.5
Easy to install
4.3
4.3
4.6
4.4
Sold By
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
RAIDEALS
Amazon.com
platform
windows 10
windows 10
windows 11
windows95
windows 10
windows 10
cpu socket
Socket TR4
Socket AM4
Socket AM4
Socket AM4
Socket AM4
Socket AM4
memory slots
4
4
4
4
4
4
memory capacity
64 GB
32 GB
128 GB
128 GB
64 GB
128 GB
compatible processors
AMD 2nd Gerenration Ryzen, AMD 1st Gerenration Ryzen
AMD 3rd Generation Ryzen
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, 5000-G Series, 4000-G Series and 3000 Series
AMD 3rd Generation Ryzen
AMD 3rd Generation Ryzen, AMD 2nd Gerenration Ryzen, AMD Athlon
AMD 3rd Generation Ryzen
card interface
pci e
pci e
pci e
pci
pci e

Product guides and documents

Product Description

Supports AMD Ryzen 2nd Generation/ Ryzen with Radeon Vega Gaphics/ Ryzen 1st Generation Dual Channel ECC/ Non-ECC Unbuffered DDR4, 4 DIMMs10+2 Phase IR Digital PWM DesignFins-Array Heatsink & Direct Touch Heatpipe 2-Way CrossFire/ SLI Graphics Support with Dual Armor and Ultra Durable Design Intel 802.11ac Wave2 2T2R WIFI & BT 5ALC1220-VB Enhance 114dB(Rear)/ 110dB(Front) SNR in Microphone and Built-in ESS SABRE DAC with WIMA Audio Capacitors Dual Ultra-Fast M.2 with NVMe PCIe X4 with Dual Thermal Guard RGB FUSION with Multi-zone LED Light Show Design, Supports Digital LED & RGB LED Strips Swappable Overlay for Accent LEDIntel Ethernet LAN with cFOS Speed Internet Accelerator USB DAC-UP 2 with Adjustable Voltage Integrated Base Plate & I/O Shield ArmorRear Power/Reset/Clear CMOS Button CEC 2019 Ready, Save Power with a Single Click; Review Rewards: http://event.gigabyte.us/review/

Looking for specific info?

Product information

Technical Details

Collapse all

Additional Information

Warranty & Support

Amazon.com Return Policy:You may return any new computer purchased from Amazon.com that is "dead on arrival," arrives in damaged condition, or is still in unopened boxes, for a full refund within 30 days of purchase. Amazon.com reserves the right to test "dead on arrival" returns and impose a customer fee equal to 15 percent of the product sales price if the customer misrepresents the condition of the product. Any returned computer that is damaged through customer misuse, is missing parts, or is in unsellable condition due to customer tampering will result in the customer being charged a higher restocking fee based on the condition of the product. Amazon.com will not accept returns of any desktop or notebook computer more than 30 days after you receive the shipment. New, used, and refurbished products purchased from Marketplace vendors are subject to the returns policy of the individual vendor.
For warranty information about this product, please Click here [PDF ]

Feedback

GIGABYTE X470 AORUS Gaming 7 WIFI (AMD Ryzen AM4/ X470/ Intel Wave 2 WIFI/ M.2) Motherboard


Found a lower price? Let us know. Although we can't match every price reported, we'll use your feedback to ensure that our prices remain competitive.

Where did you see a lower price?

URL:
Price: ($)
Shipping cost: ($)
Date of the price:
/
/

Store name:
City:
State:
Price: ($)
Date of the price:
/
/


Please sign in to provide feedback.

Customer reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
293 global ratings

Customers say

Customers like the quality, value, and appearance of the motherboard. They mention that it's well-made, stable, and has great reliability. Some appreciate the appearance and performance. That said, some complain about the bootability and color. Opinions are mixed on the wifi and ease of use.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

49 customers mention37 positive12 negative

Customers like the quality of the motherboard. They say it is well-made, a solid motherboard, and has great reliability. Some features that stand out include very durable reinforced memory slots, and really stable. Customers also say the hardware is nice once you get past the layout that requires elfen hands.

"...the onboard heat sinks keep the things cool. quality material, dual bios with removable bios chip, in case you somehow bricked both of your..." Read more

"...PROS:- Well made MB.- Easy to use bios.- Excellent features.-..." Read more

"...I've had absolutely no issues with system stability in the three weeks that I've had this board so far, aside from a minor panic a few weeks in..." Read more

"...Played a few game ran a few bench marks and the system was stable and temps were about 5c lower at the cpu despite 1.46v at max..." Read more

41 customers mention35 positive6 negative

Customers like the performance of the motherboard. They say it performs great, has no issues, and works well. The system is over all more responsive, and boots 1000x faster. The vrm/power delivery, great IO, and up-gradable wifi are also appreciated. The software doesn't impair performance, and it keeps customers up to date.

"...On the one hand the 3800X’s performance is better than ever, and on the other hand I’ve got a tighter window to find increased performance...." Read more

"...NVME slots: It works perfectly out of the box, but keep in mind that the upper port is gen3 and the lower one is gen2..." Read more

"...Easy to use bios.- Excellent features.- Works very well, recognized everything without having to update Bios or really tweak settings....." Read more

"...any of the manufacturer's software e.g. RGB Fusion and everything works perfectly fine...." Read more

26 customers mention23 positive3 negative

Customers like the appearance of the motherboard. They mention that it has a slick design and high quality materials. The LEDs look great and the board is packed with features. Some say that the BIOS takes a while to understand and sometimes there are issues with the motherboard's functionality.

"...Finally arrived looks pretty legit but with all these BIOS updates and even Nvidia driver changes my old overclocks have become unstable on both the..." Read more

"The board itself is great, slick design with high quality materials plus an overkill in terms of VRMs...." Read more

"This board is absolutely gorgeous! I didn't dislike a single thing about it... until it died on me...." Read more

"...1. Overclocks well2. Very colorful RGB lighting3. Sharp design for to compliment an aggressive looking build-The Bad-1...." Read more

14 customers mention10 positive4 negative

Customers like the value of the motherboard. They mention that it is a high-end product with an amazing price to performance ratio.

"...the video card, I switched them all good, This is a great board, worth every penny, great product bad support , so why a 5 star, the issue is..." Read more

"...now that the price has dropped another hundred dollars it's an exceptional value." Read more

"...It was a bit more expensive than I would ordinarily pay, but I wanted something that could deliver excellent performance and it doesn’t disappoint...." Read more

"...You do get what you paid for. A high end Motherboard that's suitable for Ryzen or Ryzen+. I am running a Ryzen 2600x, and so far, no issues...." Read more

27 customers mention16 positive11 negative

Customers are mixed about the ease of use of the motherboard. Some mention that the stage 1 tweaking was easy to achieve, the BIOS is easy to use, and the manual is very clear. However, others say that it was a bit hard to install the I/O Panel, the RGB Fusion App stinks, and it's a huge pita to install.

"...Stage 1 tweaking. This was easy to achieve but soaked too much time. (NA is too bored to carry on)..." Read more

"...The BIOS is confusing. Many options are named and/or placed in ways that aren't intuitive...." Read more

"...HDD: To setup the Raid0, the manual is very clear on the process to follow, it's very easy to setup within bios...." Read more

"...5. RGB Fusion App stinks - It is not intuitive and does not work well with Trident Z RAM modules, causing you to lhave to set your color pallet,..." Read more

21 customers mention11 positive10 negative

Customers are mixed about the color of the motherboard. Some mention that it overclocks well, has very colorful RGB lighting, and has changeable color lights all around the mob; while others say that it would not boot up and the RGB appeared irresponsive, the LEDs are not the same color, and look cheap. The RGB software and the LED lights on this thing are terrible.

"Great amount of RGB "bling" if wanted and many Fan AIO & RGB headers...." Read more

"...Digital rgb on the i/o cover is completely out, colors are failing all over the board, making it impossible to do most color schemes...." Read more

"...Part of that was due to the better RGB lighting options on the board and software control...." Read more

"...5. RGB Fusion App stinks - It is not intuitive and does not work well with Trident Z RAM modules, causing you to lhave to set your color pallet,..." Read more

13 customers mention6 positive7 negative

Customers are mixed about the wifi of the motherboard. Some mention that the wifi is top notch and the best they've seen offered on a motherboard, while others say that it does not work very well.

"...I would have to say that either the Intel wireless AC 9260 is terrible or the process that Gigabyte used to integrate it into the MB was bad...." Read more

"...Beastly vrm/power delivery, great IO, great (up-gradable) wifi implementation...." Read more

"...I'm unbelievably angry. I have a replacement on the way. If this bord doesn't work...." Read more

"...quality components Gigabyte uses on this motherboard, the convenience features of wifi & bluetooth are a definite plus for ease of use as well...." Read more

17 customers mention4 positive13 negative

Customers have issues with the bootability of the motherboard. They mention that the system would not boot up, the PC would still reboot, and the whole system went dead. The graphics cards are also bad with software, and they recommend not using RGB fusion.

"...the ram sticks, the motherboard is incredibly unstable and will boot loop 3 times every time you shutdown the system and attempt to power it on,..." Read more

"...minor panic a few weeks in after fiddling with it where my board wouldn't even draw power which turned out to be because I had plugged in the RGB..." Read more

"The RGB software and the RGB LEDs on this thing are TERRIBLE. The software is so bad and really needs to be reworked...." Read more

"...And startup times are most certainly decreased from before and feels like when I first switched to an SSD...." Read more

She’s a beaut’! Edit: The Ryzen 3000 BIOS struggle is FIXED!
5 Stars
She’s a beaut’! Edit: The Ryzen 3000 BIOS struggle is FIXED!
Edit: The following are excerpts from my review experience using the 3800X on my board. It’s relevant to gigabyte and others.————————————————————-Great CPU for everyone at stock, challenging for overclock enthusiasts.Edit 12 - “Welcome to the party pal!” : BIOS F50 AGESA 1.0.0.4 B, ‘Return of the Features’, memory overclocking, CPU under volting, and 1usmus Power Plan conclusion.Black Friday, Cyber Monday, and Christmas sales mean choosing the 3800X over the 3700X is easy as the likelihood of a better binned chip and better Infinity Fabric is worth the $30-$40 price difference. So welcome to Enthusiast Land where we find the limits for fun! And while I do encourage others to join it can be rough out here sometimes.BIOS F50 AGESA 1.0.0.4 B, the refinement of the microcode has helped stabilize my computer’s performance. (Reset the profiles again!) It also brought back many features that I forgot my board came with. It’s been interesting to see a new base line of performance emerge and I’ve got mixed feelings about it. On the one hand the 3800X’s performance is better than ever, and on the other hand I’ve got a tighter window to find increased performance. Yes it’s nice to have better performance than before but dang if it isn’t annoying to have my tweaks repeatedly nulled.The BIOS for my X470 board had a bunch of features removed for the launch of the 3000 series for stability reasons I suppose and I got so used to it that I only remembered them when this BIOS brought them back. CPU features like AMD Cool’n’Quiet came back and some voltage controls can actually control voltage again. Other features Have been gradually added from X570 boards like CPPC, Global C-state Control, and PPC Adjustment. Which leads us to 1usmus‘s power plan.So with all these features now active again or introduced the 1usmus power plan actually works. It’s only noticeable when the processor encounters a lightly threaded program or many single thread programs. The normal AMD Power Plan distributes these jobs seemingly randomly over all the cores. 1usmus’s Power Plan focuses all the processes on your best CCX and sleeps the other CCX.Going by AMD’s statements the best pair of cores in one CCX on your CPU (usually Gold Star and grey dot) are supposed to be the best at handling high demand or have high overclocking/electrically stable potential. Which makes it seem like 1usmus PP is how it’s supposed to be. Neither plan is perfect. AMD idles hotter but is on average cooler than full work load 1usmus. And W10 keeps messing with my results too.I now prefer to use 1usmus but with my own Ryzen Master OC acting as a firmer boosting and peak voltage guide. I sincerely wish I could control how much voltage is sent to each core and have a ramping effect rather than keeping one core constantly at peak voltage. Keeping the 3800X cool is all you need for stability as when I’ve tested 1.275 and kept it under 65C it easily ran 4.45/4.40. After 65C my cooler hits a thermal runway with my 3800X and can’t get rid of the heat fast enough.If you can get a good custom water cooling set up, two 240s or two 280s, and you keep it under 65C, you can probably find awesome overclocking/under-volting potential.With this better default performance in mind let’s test memory. Average of three.Full default motherboard settings, XMP, and Ryzen Master OC.BIOS F50 3800X Default 2133 DRAM 1200 IF-vs-BIOS F50 3800X Default 3600 XMP DRAM 1800 IF-vs-BIOS F50 3800X (4.35/4.30 1.35v) 3600 XMP DRAM 1800 IF———————————————————————————Cinebench 15: 2154 - 2164 - 2237Cinebench 20: 4943 - 4954 - 51323DMark11: Physics FPS: 54.58 - 62.55 - 63.393DMark Cloud: Physics FPS: 53.76 - 56.18 - 56.843DMark Sky Diver: Physics FPS: 66.85 - 75.60 - 76.513DMark Firestrike: Physics FPS: 74.01 - 78.73 - 77.43 (W10 strikes again)3DMark Time Spy: Physics FPS: 31.92 - 35.57 - 36.16Stage 1 tweaking. This was easy to achieve but soaked too much time. (NA is too bored to carry on)BIOS F50 3800X Default 3600CL16 DRAM 1800 IF-vs-BIOS F50 3800X (4.35/4.30 1.35v) 3600CL16 DRAM 1800 IF-vs-BIOS F50 3800X (4.35/4.30 1.35v) 3800 XMP DRAM 1900 IF———————————————————————————Cinebench 15: 2162 - 2220 - 2255Cinebench 20: 4985 - 5160 - 5146 (W10?)3DMark11: Physics FPS: 63.74 - 64.27 - 64.503DMark Cloud: Physics FPS: 55.27 - 56.16 - 57.703DMark Sky Diver: Physics FPS: 76.46 - 78.58 - 77.493DMark Firestrike: Physics FPS: 79.34 - 80.48 - NA3DMark Time Spy: Physics FPS: 35.61 - 36.83 - NAStage 2 tweaking once I get in the mood again. Zen 2 BIOS has come a long way in performance.Really want a better GPU to stretch my 3800X’s legs with.Edit 11 - Yippie Ki Yay Overclock'n! : BIOS F50a AGESA 1.0.0.4 & Windows 10 1usmus Power Plan. Return of memory OC.It's here! (11/10/19) And wouldn't ya know it the changes in BIOS mean saved profiles no longer apply when loaded so time for new tweaks! It's all good news so far as the introduced changes in the BIOS have allowed me to further increase my Infinity Fabric Clock and my memory overclock. (11/15/19) 1900 IF and 32GB of 3800Mhz CL 18-20-20-20-36-58 memory @ 1.4v (still tweaking, there's more there). This has essentially tied my 3000Mhz CL14 in C20 and helped game FPS (Ryzen be like that). And startup times are most certainly decreased from before and feels like when I first switched to an SSD.Destiny 2 runs flawlessly now (8 hour marathon and no crashes! New record!).Now 1usmus is THE Ryzen memory overclocking guy and he came up with a W10 power plan that he claims boosts Ryzen performance. While I can't say for sure as I've been switching between my tweaks and the different power plans it seems to at least not decrease performance. There is however strange behavior from the average CPU voltage as a whole since W10 1903 (I'm on 1909) as it now only rarely sleeps cores. I'm still testing.9/10 would update to this new BIOS again.Edit 10 - Edit (insert Die Hard reference here): BIOS F42e (what happened to c and d?). Attempted improvements to aspects of the motherboard but an unexpectedly screechy side effect. So my CPU performance is still great but Gigabyte screwed up somewhere.While the notes for the BIOS don’t say much of anything and it’s still 1.0.0.3 ABBA, my system seemed to boot just a bit faster than before. And that would have been nice to keep but for what ever reason whenever I played Destiny 2 it glitched the audio out for over ten minutes each time (I quit before letting it go further) and screeched like a broken Halloween decoration. Not like, “boo,” more like stadium feedback mixed with a scream mixed with max treble and erratic high pitch and volume. I find enemy Hive screams pleasant in comparison. And this led to reinstalls of audio drivers, verifying Destiny 2 install, and testing in other games, but of course D2 is special.So I’m back to F42b. What ever initial ABBA BIOS you got, you might want to stick with if you play Destiny 2.Looking forward to 1.0.0.4 with ‘100+’ micro code improvements but like before you can expect it on X470/B450/X370 in around a month or so (late November or sometime in December).Side note: It’s winter! And that means attempting overclocking again with below freezing air flowing by! Long story short, not a noticeable difference, but the GPU liked it. Gamers Nexus already demonstrated that real automatic performance improvements only occur with LN2 and while that’d be fun, I just don’t have anywhere to put an LN2 container.Additional Side Note: I’m skipping the 5700 XT. The jury is out and most models have been tested by nearly every tech outlet. Similar to this CPU, almost all the overclocking headroom is already used and means no real tweaking. If the performance was just a bit more then I’d go for it but I have a 144Hz 1440p G-Sync monitor (before Nvidia embraced Free-sync) and losing that for frame rates that would show tearing just wasn’t enough for the switch. Still probably a red team future.Edit 9 - Edit harder: BIOS F42b. This not only implemented ABBA, the fix for boost problems, it also fixed a bunch of bugs in the Gigabyte BIOS in general. No more boot hitches, GPU driver errors, and memory overclocks are a breeze. Hurray!So yes, it automatically boosts properly now. I see 4.4-4.5 spikes on my best cores under load and all core auto is 4.2. OC All core is 4.35/4.3 @ 1.325V and 4.5/4.3 @ ~1.48 (it over heats almost immediately, see below).Sad news is I think my Corsair AIO is either failing or the horrible cold plate leveling is making direct cooling of the chiplets too difficult now. Its' copper surface is convex and therefore doesn’t cool the edges of the cpu properly. The chiplet for CPU cores is nearer the edge of the chip than typical mono chips.A quick word on my earlier edits CPU GHz numbers. Before Edit 5 I was using CPUZ and HWMonitor as Ryzen Master was broken on my computer. The new Ryzen Master to be used with the 3000 series installed an additional folder in the registry and then tried to reference the old Ryzen Master registry which broke the install until the old registry was deleted by me.During the testing of Edit 5 and after I began using HWINFO and Ryzen Master (then fixed). HWMonitor gives “optimistic” boost readings and CPUZ can’t tell the whole story. Looking at Ryzen Master, which only updates once per second, and HWINFO seems to correctly catch was HWMonitor almost gets. So the previous 4.5 readings were likely "stretch clocks”, not really increased performance, and single core readings of 4.65 sadly were likely a read error. (An earlier edit of this edit I screwed up and switched HWINFO and HWMonitor, they are correctly ordered now.)Edit 8 - A good day to Edit: Y’all fans of ABBA? Gonna be dancing soon enough to the latest BIOS that’ll have AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA, the fix for Zen 2 to hit the advertised boost clocks automatically.Rather than forcing the CPU to dance to my tune, which doesn’t quite jive with boost/voltage mechanics of Zen 2, it’ll boost to the rated clocks. While I’ve only heard of it beginning to hit X570 there aren’t any X470/B450 or X370 BIOS(s) being released yet and AMD is projecting broad releases by September 30th.Now I did in fact switch back to the now pulled/old F41c BIOS which was replaced by F41 officially. Since my motherboard has dual BIOS I can switch between them quickly. Long story short with exactly the same settings F41c posts and F41/F42a doesn’t. Basically, F41c rocks higher memory overclocks and tighter timings (my old OCs I missed you!). Downside, the CPU auto boosts are super inconsistent 4.1 - 4.3 under close to identical conditions (temp, ambient, active programs) using the same benchmarks. And it’s full of twitchy boosts like reacting to rapid mouse movements, which is present in F40 as well, F41 and F42a fix this.Side note: $200 for 32Gb 3600CL18 (OC CL16) with built in RGB and temp monitoring? Bought. I just had to get 3600 memory, I couldn’t take it anymore, I needed to know if it made a change, and it did. Better frame times and game FPS, but since it’s generally looser timings, Cinebench took a hit and I imagine production applications would take a hit as well. 3000CL14 got better scores than 3600CL16 but games ran faster.I’m not sure how much further I want to test tighter timings as I do want to get ABBA when it releases, but I’ll probably keep pushing it until something breaks because, “Yippee Ki Yay Overclock’n!”Edit 7 - Live free or Edit: Begrudgingly settled on latest BIOS for overclocking (7/31), oc scores, and the importance of Motherboards.BIOS F42a is a tricky one, coupled with updates to Windows I no longer get detectable voltage drops below 1v in auto. Keep in mind this is with the Ryzen Balanced Power plan as well. Granted it was through monitoring software and an oscilloscope would be ideal. But if we look at my temperature monitoring, my CPUs idle temps went up around 10C, maybe another BIOS or Windows update will change it. You can go see my over clocking results near the bottom of the review, which slightly decreased over time with one update after another but the average improvement currently over stock is around 8%.My previous boost clocks are down and I am running headlong into thermal limits before I get back to my old manual oc. I’m considering going back to BIOS 41c and I’ll probably edit when I’m done testing again.Motherboards: I use the Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 WiFi, I like the board but some of the BIOS updates have been kinder to me than others, and if you want to get the most out of your 3800X you might really need dig deep. One of the most interesting recent developments with Zen 2 is how different motherboards using the same CPU can’t achieve the same clock speeds. One examination by Hardware Unboxed looked at 14 different motherboards with most being X570 and one being a B350. Of the 14 motherboards only six met or exceeded the 3800X’s boost clock of 4.5Ghz with manual adjustments. Of those six only three exceeded 4.5, the Aorus Xtreme (4.550), MSI A Pro (4.525), and Aorus Master (4.525).There’s performance available with the right motherboard it seems and being on X570 might mean fewer wacky and frustrating BIOS ‘updates’ like what I’m going through on X470.Edit 6 - Edit with a Vengeance: Yet another BIOS, F42a. RIP my old OCs but Cinebench 20: 4501 -> 4687.Thanks to the dedication of many internet and YouTube based reviewers/researchers, voltages and clock speeds for Zen 2 are now better understood. 1.5 volt bursts are within design perimeters with it dropping to sub 1 volt when unengaged. (Often so fast it’s only detectible by Oscilloscope.) AMD has binned and designed these processors so throughly that traditional overclocking isn’t as applicable anymore. Zen 2 often try’s to reach user OC clocks and voltages only to score worse despite posting. It’s quite the journey and will continue to be at this rate. I’m enjoying the challenge as an enthusiast and even if I didn’t OC the performance gain over Zen + has been great.Edit 5: New chipset and drivers and BIOS oh my! Suffice to say, Cinebench R20: 3715 -> 4501.Edit 4: While I'm still working on OC results the prelim finding is as follows: All core OC (4.5) is great for full load applications but the manual tweaking to get controlled automatic operation (auto boosts) is better for games. (3.2 to 4.65)Edit 2/3: After reinstalling F4 BIOS and 2600X, testing F4, F30, F40, and F41c BIOS; then testing and retesting 3800X with F40 & F41c, the results seem to have settled down. F40 played Nice with the 2600X more than 41c and 3800X likes the 41c better.Some strange system behavior prompted the BIOS testing which was irritating me as while the 2600X obeyed my instructions and settings and the 3800X didn’t. After diving deeper and probing further I remembered what I read on reddit about some motherboards pushing 30-50% more watts than spec. Not only did limiting PPT W to 105W lower temperatures, it also curbed voltage spikes with more consistent lower Vcore when idle: 1.00 Vcore. When under load it only occasionally taps 1.380 and hangs around 1.3-1.35. So all this in addition to what settings I used below actually resulted in some better scores in some places, which I’ll put a note on. Although it did lower boost frequency in some spots I’ll still have to test more.Side note: I’ve never had to work this hard to make a CPU run around spec. I mean I sort of knew it was coming but good lord. And I haven’t even serious started overclocking yet.Edit 1: Wrangle that voltage. (See voltage.)Bought at $399.99. Looking forward to hopefully a better binned 3700X essentially.Finally arrived looks pretty legit but with all these BIOS updates and even Nvidia driver changes my old overclocks have become unstable on both the 2600X (RIP 4.2@1.325) and 1070Ti. For example, after updating to the first Ryzen 3000 BIOS I lost the OC on my Ram from 3333CL15 to 3333CL16. Was previously proved stable via Prime95 and memtest86. Booting is also strange and hiccups compared to 2600X boots, it boots but hangs a couple times. Hoping future BIOS updates will even things out.Voltage: The default Gigabyte determined voltage being sent to the 3800X is scary (1.35 - 1.55 Vcore) so I’ve set Vcore to Normal with a -0.10 Dynamic Vcore and Standard on the Loadline Calibration so it typically runs at 1.205 - 1.380. That is the baseline I’m using for the 3800X, with this setting it turbos to 4.4 GHz almost all the time and all-core 4.3.————————————————————-Coming from an i7 3770K and GTX 570 SLI I was looking forward to a GPU upgrade in late 2017 but the CPU bottlenecked my new 1070Ti.The hype that AMD was bringing was a breath of fresh air and convinced me to switch. I didn’t think I’d ever use 8 real cores and 16 threads (years of intel 4 cores had yet to leave my mind) so I got the 2600X which thanks to the dramatic upgrade made a pretty huge difference.I ended up getting my new set up fully going in mid 2018. After a bunch of trial and error in no small part due to the rough transition to Gigabyte’s BIOS/UEFI coming from an ASUS P67 TUF MoBo; which was easier to navigate, but it’s also because of my inexperience with AMD CPU overclocking, I started seriously tweaking it.As an enthusiast overclocker I wanted one of the best boards out there and this was my choice. Mostly because I typically like overkill on parts related to stability like this 10+2 power phase, the real functioning heat sinks, and even the two USB DAC-UP 2 connectors for stabilizing long USB connections. And just like when I bought my AX1200i in 2012 I wanted something that will last and adapt to future rigs. Being a top end X470 while being AM4 means at least (hopefully) two more generations of compatibility.The RGB ended up being a bit of an afterthought and I initially disabled it. But every time you boot the RGB comes on for a split second and after a year I just accepted it and replaced the no window case with one where I could appreciate it.After about a year of AMD I can honestly say I love finally having more than 4 cores and those 12 threads are awesome! I’m looking forward to pushing the board even further when I get the new 3900X (I don’t think I’ll need 16 cores anytime soon... or maybe I will...).- Ryzen 2600X OC 4.25Ghz 1.37v- Corsair LPX 4x8GB OC 3333Mhz CL 15 (Corsair Vengeance Airflow)- Samsung 860 EVO 2TB SSD- WD Black 2TB HD- MSI GTX 1070 Ti Titanium OC ~2000Mhz Core ~4000Mhz Memory- Corsair Ax1200iAs for my thoughts on X570 I’m still debating on it but I didn’t think I’ll get it immediately as I’d need basically a whole new system to take advantage of it. New cpu, mobo, gpu, ram, PCIe 4.0 NVMe, and or maybe one of those PCIe 4.0 NVMe raid cards for insane speeds. Basically a new computer. But maybe the cpu and mobo would be enough. Ah well.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2019
Customer image
BC
5.0 out of 5 stars She’s a beaut’! Edit: The Ryzen 3000 BIOS struggle is FIXED!
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2019
Edit: The following are excerpts from my review experience using the 3800X on my board. It’s relevant to gigabyte and others.
————————————————————-
Great CPU for everyone at stock, challenging for overclock enthusiasts.

Edit 12 - “Welcome to the party pal!” : BIOS F50 AGESA 1.0.0.4 B, ‘Return of the Features’, memory overclocking, CPU under volting, and 1usmus Power Plan conclusion.

Black Friday, Cyber Monday, and Christmas sales mean choosing the 3800X over the 3700X is easy as the likelihood of a better binned chip and better Infinity Fabric is worth the $30-$40 price difference. So welcome to Enthusiast Land where we find the limits for fun! And while I do encourage others to join it can be rough out here sometimes.

BIOS F50 AGESA 1.0.0.4 B, the refinement of the microcode has helped stabilize my computer’s performance. (Reset the profiles again!) It also brought back many features that I forgot my board came with. It’s been interesting to see a new base line of performance emerge and I’ve got mixed feelings about it. On the one hand the 3800X’s performance is better than ever, and on the other hand I’ve got a tighter window to find increased performance. Yes it’s nice to have better performance than before but dang if it isn’t annoying to have my tweaks repeatedly nulled.

The BIOS for my X470 board had a bunch of features removed for the launch of the 3000 series for stability reasons I suppose and I got so used to it that I only remembered them when this BIOS brought them back. CPU features like AMD Cool’n’Quiet came back and some voltage controls can actually control voltage again. Other features Have been gradually added from X570 boards like CPPC, Global C-state Control, and PPC Adjustment. Which leads us to 1usmus‘s power plan.

So with all these features now active again or introduced the 1usmus power plan actually works. It’s only noticeable when the processor encounters a lightly threaded program or many single thread programs. The normal AMD Power Plan distributes these jobs seemingly randomly over all the cores. 1usmus’s Power Plan focuses all the processes on your best CCX and sleeps the other CCX.

Going by AMD’s statements the best pair of cores in one CCX on your CPU (usually Gold Star and grey dot) are supposed to be the best at handling high demand or have high overclocking/electrically stable potential. Which makes it seem like 1usmus PP is how it’s supposed to be. Neither plan is perfect. AMD idles hotter but is on average cooler than full work load 1usmus. And W10 keeps messing with my results too.

I now prefer to use 1usmus but with my own Ryzen Master OC acting as a firmer boosting and peak voltage guide. I sincerely wish I could control how much voltage is sent to each core and have a ramping effect rather than keeping one core constantly at peak voltage. Keeping the 3800X cool is all you need for stability as when I’ve tested 1.275 and kept it under 65C it easily ran 4.45/4.40. After 65C my cooler hits a thermal runway with my 3800X and can’t get rid of the heat fast enough.

If you can get a good custom water cooling set up, two 240s or two 280s, and you keep it under 65C, you can probably find awesome overclocking/under-volting potential.

With this better default performance in mind let’s test memory. Average of three.
Full default motherboard settings, XMP, and Ryzen Master OC.

BIOS F50 3800X Default 2133 DRAM 1200 IF
-vs-
BIOS F50 3800X Default 3600 XMP DRAM 1800 IF
-vs-
BIOS F50 3800X (4.35/4.30 1.35v) 3600 XMP DRAM 1800 IF
———————————————————————————
Cinebench 15: 2154 - 2164 - 2237
Cinebench 20: 4943 - 4954 - 5132
3DMark11: Physics FPS: 54.58 - 62.55 - 63.39
3DMark Cloud: Physics FPS: 53.76 - 56.18 - 56.84
3DMark Sky Diver: Physics FPS: 66.85 - 75.60 - 76.51
3DMark Firestrike: Physics FPS: 74.01 - 78.73 - 77.43 (W10 strikes again)
3DMark Time Spy: Physics FPS: 31.92 - 35.57 - 36.16

Stage 1 tweaking. This was easy to achieve but soaked too much time. (NA is too bored to carry on)

BIOS F50 3800X Default 3600CL16 DRAM 1800 IF
-vs-
BIOS F50 3800X (4.35/4.30 1.35v) 3600CL16 DRAM 1800 IF
-vs-
BIOS F50 3800X (4.35/4.30 1.35v) 3800 XMP DRAM 1900 IF
———————————————————————————
Cinebench 15: 2162 - 2220 - 2255
Cinebench 20: 4985 - 5160 - 5146 (W10?)
3DMark11: Physics FPS: 63.74 - 64.27 - 64.50
3DMark Cloud: Physics FPS: 55.27 - 56.16 - 57.70
3DMark Sky Diver: Physics FPS: 76.46 - 78.58 - 77.49
3DMark Firestrike: Physics FPS: 79.34 - 80.48 - NA
3DMark Time Spy: Physics FPS: 35.61 - 36.83 - NA

Stage 2 tweaking once I get in the mood again. Zen 2 BIOS has come a long way in performance.
Really want a better GPU to stretch my 3800X’s legs with.

Edit 11 - Yippie Ki Yay Overclock'n! : BIOS F50a AGESA 1.0.0.4 & Windows 10 1usmus Power Plan. Return of memory OC.

It's here! (11/10/19) And wouldn't ya know it the changes in BIOS mean saved profiles no longer apply when loaded so time for new tweaks! It's all good news so far as the introduced changes in the BIOS have allowed me to further increase my Infinity Fabric Clock and my memory overclock. (11/15/19) 1900 IF and 32GB of 3800Mhz CL 18-20-20-20-36-58 memory @ 1.4v (still tweaking, there's more there). This has essentially tied my 3000Mhz CL14 in C20 and helped game FPS (Ryzen be like that). And startup times are most certainly decreased from before and feels like when I first switched to an SSD.

Destiny 2 runs flawlessly now (8 hour marathon and no crashes! New record!).

Now 1usmus is THE Ryzen memory overclocking guy and he came up with a W10 power plan that he claims boosts Ryzen performance. While I can't say for sure as I've been switching between my tweaks and the different power plans it seems to at least not decrease performance. There is however strange behavior from the average CPU voltage as a whole since W10 1903 (I'm on 1909) as it now only rarely sleeps cores. I'm still testing.

9/10 would update to this new BIOS again.

Edit 10 - Edit (insert Die Hard reference here): BIOS F42e (what happened to c and d?). Attempted improvements to aspects of the motherboard but an unexpectedly screechy side effect. So my CPU performance is still great but Gigabyte screwed up somewhere.

While the notes for the BIOS don’t say much of anything and it’s still 1.0.0.3 ABBA, my system seemed to boot just a bit faster than before. And that would have been nice to keep but for what ever reason whenever I played Destiny 2 it glitched the audio out for over ten minutes each time (I quit before letting it go further) and screeched like a broken Halloween decoration. Not like, “boo,” more like stadium feedback mixed with a scream mixed with max treble and erratic high pitch and volume. I find enemy Hive screams pleasant in comparison. And this led to reinstalls of audio drivers, verifying Destiny 2 install, and testing in other games, but of course D2 is special.

So I’m back to F42b. What ever initial ABBA BIOS you got, you might want to stick with if you play Destiny 2.

Looking forward to 1.0.0.4 with ‘100+’ micro code improvements but like before you can expect it on X470/B450/X370 in around a month or so (late November or sometime in December).

Side note: It’s winter! And that means attempting overclocking again with below freezing air flowing by! Long story short, not a noticeable difference, but the GPU liked it. Gamers Nexus already demonstrated that real automatic performance improvements only occur with LN2 and while that’d be fun, I just don’t have anywhere to put an LN2 container.

Additional Side Note: I’m skipping the 5700 XT. The jury is out and most models have been tested by nearly every tech outlet. Similar to this CPU, almost all the overclocking headroom is already used and means no real tweaking. If the performance was just a bit more then I’d go for it but I have a 144Hz 1440p G-Sync monitor (before Nvidia embraced Free-sync) and losing that for frame rates that would show tearing just wasn’t enough for the switch. Still probably a red team future.

Edit 9 - Edit harder: BIOS F42b. This not only implemented ABBA, the fix for boost problems, it also fixed a bunch of bugs in the Gigabyte BIOS in general. No more boot hitches, GPU driver errors, and memory overclocks are a breeze. Hurray!

So yes, it automatically boosts properly now. I see 4.4-4.5 spikes on my best cores under load and all core auto is 4.2. OC All core is 4.35/4.3 @ 1.325V and 4.5/4.3 @ ~1.48 (it over heats almost immediately, see below).

Sad news is I think my Corsair AIO is either failing or the horrible cold plate leveling is making direct cooling of the chiplets too difficult now. Its' copper surface is convex and therefore doesn’t cool the edges of the cpu properly. The chiplet for CPU cores is nearer the edge of the chip than typical mono chips.

A quick word on my earlier edits CPU GHz numbers. Before Edit 5 I was using CPUZ and HWMonitor as Ryzen Master was broken on my computer. The new Ryzen Master to be used with the 3000 series installed an additional folder in the registry and then tried to reference the old Ryzen Master registry which broke the install until the old registry was deleted by me.

During the testing of Edit 5 and after I began using HWINFO and Ryzen Master (then fixed). HWMonitor gives “optimistic” boost readings and CPUZ can’t tell the whole story. Looking at Ryzen Master, which only updates once per second, and HWINFO seems to correctly catch was HWMonitor almost gets. So the previous 4.5 readings were likely "stretch clocks”, not really increased performance, and single core readings of 4.65 sadly were likely a read error. (An earlier edit of this edit I screwed up and switched HWINFO and HWMonitor, they are correctly ordered now.)

Edit 8 - A good day to Edit: Y’all fans of ABBA? Gonna be dancing soon enough to the latest BIOS that’ll have AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA, the fix for Zen 2 to hit the advertised boost clocks automatically.

Rather than forcing the CPU to dance to my tune, which doesn’t quite jive with boost/voltage mechanics of Zen 2, it’ll boost to the rated clocks. While I’ve only heard of it beginning to hit X570 there aren’t any X470/B450 or X370 BIOS(s) being released yet and AMD is projecting broad releases by September 30th.

Now I did in fact switch back to the now pulled/old F41c BIOS which was replaced by F41 officially. Since my motherboard has dual BIOS I can switch between them quickly. Long story short with exactly the same settings F41c posts and F41/F42a doesn’t. Basically, F41c rocks higher memory overclocks and tighter timings (my old OCs I missed you!). Downside, the CPU auto boosts are super inconsistent 4.1 - 4.3 under close to identical conditions (temp, ambient, active programs) using the same benchmarks. And it’s full of twitchy boosts like reacting to rapid mouse movements, which is present in F40 as well, F41 and F42a fix this.

Side note: $200 for 32Gb 3600CL18 (OC CL16) with built in RGB and temp monitoring? Bought. I just had to get 3600 memory, I couldn’t take it anymore, I needed to know if it made a change, and it did. Better frame times and game FPS, but since it’s generally looser timings, Cinebench took a hit and I imagine production applications would take a hit as well. 3000CL14 got better scores than 3600CL16 but games ran faster.

I’m not sure how much further I want to test tighter timings as I do want to get ABBA when it releases, but I’ll probably keep pushing it until something breaks because, “Yippee Ki Yay Overclock’n!”

Edit 7 - Live free or Edit: Begrudgingly settled on latest BIOS for overclocking (7/31), oc scores, and the importance of Motherboards.

BIOS F42a is a tricky one, coupled with updates to Windows I no longer get detectable voltage drops below 1v in auto. Keep in mind this is with the Ryzen Balanced Power plan as well. Granted it was through monitoring software and an oscilloscope would be ideal. But if we look at my temperature monitoring, my CPUs idle temps went up around 10C, maybe another BIOS or Windows update will change it. You can go see my over clocking results near the bottom of the review, which slightly decreased over time with one update after another but the average improvement currently over stock is around 8%.

My previous boost clocks are down and I am running headlong into thermal limits before I get back to my old manual oc. I’m considering going back to BIOS 41c and I’ll probably edit when I’m done testing again.

Motherboards: I use the Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 WiFi, I like the board but some of the BIOS updates have been kinder to me than others, and if you want to get the most out of your 3800X you might really need dig deep. One of the most interesting recent developments with Zen 2 is how different motherboards using the same CPU can’t achieve the same clock speeds. One examination by Hardware Unboxed looked at 14 different motherboards with most being X570 and one being a B350. Of the 14 motherboards only six met or exceeded the 3800X’s boost clock of 4.5Ghz with manual adjustments. Of those six only three exceeded 4.5, the Aorus Xtreme (4.550), MSI A Pro (4.525), and Aorus Master (4.525).

There’s performance available with the right motherboard it seems and being on X570 might mean fewer wacky and frustrating BIOS ‘updates’ like what I’m going through on X470.

Edit 6 - Edit with a Vengeance: Yet another BIOS, F42a. RIP my old OCs but Cinebench 20: 4501 -> 4687.

Thanks to the dedication of many internet and YouTube based reviewers/researchers, voltages and clock speeds for Zen 2 are now better understood. 1.5 volt bursts are within design perimeters with it dropping to sub 1 volt when unengaged. (Often so fast it’s only detectible by Oscilloscope.) AMD has binned and designed these processors so throughly that traditional overclocking isn’t as applicable anymore. Zen 2 often try’s to reach user OC clocks and voltages only to score worse despite posting. It’s quite the journey and will continue to be at this rate. I’m enjoying the challenge as an enthusiast and even if I didn’t OC the performance gain over Zen + has been great.

Edit 5: New chipset and drivers and BIOS oh my! Suffice to say, Cinebench R20: 3715 -> 4501.

Edit 4: While I'm still working on OC results the prelim finding is as follows: All core OC (4.5) is great for full load applications but the manual tweaking to get controlled automatic operation (auto boosts) is better for games. (3.2 to 4.65)

Edit 2/3: After reinstalling F4 BIOS and 2600X, testing F4, F30, F40, and F41c BIOS; then testing and retesting 3800X with F40 & F41c, the results seem to have settled down. F40 played Nice with the 2600X more than 41c and 3800X likes the 41c better.

Some strange system behavior prompted the BIOS testing which was irritating me as while the 2600X obeyed my instructions and settings and the 3800X didn’t. After diving deeper and probing further I remembered what I read on reddit about some motherboards pushing 30-50% more watts than spec. Not only did limiting PPT W to 105W lower temperatures, it also curbed voltage spikes with more consistent lower Vcore when idle: 1.00 Vcore. When under load it only occasionally taps 1.380 and hangs around 1.3-1.35. So all this in addition to what settings I used below actually resulted in some better scores in some places, which I’ll put a note on. Although it did lower boost frequency in some spots I’ll still have to test more.

Side note: I’ve never had to work this hard to make a CPU run around spec. I mean I sort of knew it was coming but good lord. And I haven’t even serious started overclocking yet.

Edit 1: Wrangle that voltage. (See voltage.)

Bought at $399.99. Looking forward to hopefully a better binned 3700X essentially.

Finally arrived looks pretty legit but with all these BIOS updates and even Nvidia driver changes my old overclocks have become unstable on both the 2600X (RIP 4.2@1.325) and 1070Ti. For example, after updating to the first Ryzen 3000 BIOS I lost the OC on my Ram from 3333CL15 to 3333CL16. Was previously proved stable via Prime95 and memtest86. Booting is also strange and hiccups compared to 2600X boots, it boots but hangs a couple times. Hoping future BIOS updates will even things out.

Voltage: The default Gigabyte determined voltage being sent to the 3800X is scary (1.35 - 1.55 Vcore) so I’ve set Vcore to Normal with a -0.10 Dynamic Vcore and Standard on the Loadline Calibration so it typically runs at 1.205 - 1.380. That is the baseline I’m using for the 3800X, with this setting it turbos to 4.4 GHz almost all the time and all-core 4.3.
————————————————————-
Coming from an i7 3770K and GTX 570 SLI I was looking forward to a GPU upgrade in late 2017 but the CPU bottlenecked my new 1070Ti.

The hype that AMD was bringing was a breath of fresh air and convinced me to switch. I didn’t think I’d ever use 8 real cores and 16 threads (years of intel 4 cores had yet to leave my mind) so I got the 2600X which thanks to the dramatic upgrade made a pretty huge difference.

I ended up getting my new set up fully going in mid 2018. After a bunch of trial and error in no small part due to the rough transition to Gigabyte’s BIOS/UEFI coming from an ASUS P67 TUF MoBo; which was easier to navigate, but it’s also because of my inexperience with AMD CPU overclocking, I started seriously tweaking it.

As an enthusiast overclocker I wanted one of the best boards out there and this was my choice. Mostly because I typically like overkill on parts related to stability like this 10+2 power phase, the real functioning heat sinks, and even the two USB DAC-UP 2 connectors for stabilizing long USB connections. And just like when I bought my AX1200i in 2012 I wanted something that will last and adapt to future rigs. Being a top end X470 while being AM4 means at least (hopefully) two more generations of compatibility.

The RGB ended up being a bit of an afterthought and I initially disabled it. But every time you boot the RGB comes on for a split second and after a year I just accepted it and replaced the no window case with one where I could appreciate it.

After about a year of AMD I can honestly say I love finally having more than 4 cores and those 12 threads are awesome! I’m looking forward to pushing the board even further when I get the new 3900X (I don’t think I’ll need 16 cores anytime soon... or maybe I will...).

- Ryzen 2600X OC 4.25Ghz 1.37v
- Corsair LPX 4x8GB OC 3333Mhz CL 15 (Corsair Vengeance Airflow)
- Samsung 860 EVO 2TB SSD
- WD Black 2TB HD
- MSI GTX 1070 Ti Titanium OC ~2000Mhz Core ~4000Mhz Memory
- Corsair Ax1200i

As for my thoughts on X570 I’m still debating on it but I didn’t think I’ll get it immediately as I’d need basically a whole new system to take advantage of it. New cpu, mobo, gpu, ram, PCIe 4.0 NVMe, and or maybe one of those PCIe 4.0 NVMe raid cards for insane speeds. Basically a new computer. But maybe the cpu and mobo would be enough. Ah well.
Images in this review
Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image
Customer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer image
6 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on August 4, 2018
7 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on August 24, 2018
One person found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Sangeetha
5.0 out of 5 stars Good product
Reviewed in India on October 26, 2022
Guillermo Rosales
5.0 out of 5 stars Producto de excelente calidad
Reviewed in Spain on March 17, 2019
One person found this helpful
Report
Guessde
5.0 out of 5 stars Por el momento Bien
Reviewed in Mexico on July 18, 2019
Kimifan
5.0 out of 5 stars Full atx case for top mounted liquid cooling.
Reviewed in Canada on October 26, 2018
2 people found this helpful
Report
Ric
5.0 out of 5 stars La tarjeta madre es hermosa ya encendida.
Reviewed in Mexico on November 19, 2019
Customer image
Ric
5.0 out of 5 stars La tarjeta madre es hermosa ya encendida.
Reviewed in Mexico on November 19, 2019
Lo que no me gusto es que al momento de actualizar la BIOS para poner mi ryzen 9 3900x me daba un error de driver en la tarjeta inalambrica WIFI y si regresas un ryzen de 2da generacion no tiene ningun problema. Fue un dolor de cabeza solucionar ese error por parte de Gigabite. Pero al final quedo satisfecho con la calidad y belleza de esta tarjeta madre X470.
Images in this review
Customer image
Customer image