Amazon.com: Customer reviews: BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor technology for Accurate Reproduction

Top positive review

Great Monitor

Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2019

I bit the bullet and spent more dollars than I ever have to buy the BenQ monitor. I was replacing a monitor that I liked (not BENQ) that had died. After using the monitor, especially photo editing, for several months I just love it! The color rendition is great; the size of the monitor is great; and it works well for doing video (no smearing). All in all - money well spent.

In my environment I chose not to use the hood so I can't anything about it.

The puck for controlling the monitor just seems like a gimmick to me. I don't ever switch color space and rarely tweak the monitor so the puck just sits in in its tray.

I don’t game so I can’t say how well it might work for that.

I used my Spyder3 to calibrate it to the RGB color space and worked fine. I could not use the monitor hardware with the Spyder3 but that was OK with me. The calibration check amazed me as to how close the monitor came to the RGB spec.

One person found this helpful

Top critical review

Critical reviews›

ScorpioWolf

Disappointed with the SW2700PT

Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2017

The reviews everywhere for the SW2700PT are favorable (including here on Amazon) and it seemed like a solid choice for my new monitor. On paper, this is the 27" QHD IPS monitor to beat for an entry level photography model, $599 is an outstanding deal in comparison to the $1000 starting price point for everything else with good reviews. Colors popped as expected and backlight bleed/IPS glow is minimal (barely noticeable). It has a striking industrial design and the wired puck remote control to adjust settings is a nice touch. Also, this thing is built like a tank, very heavy/sturdy construction. I confess, I really wanted to like the SW2700PT - I had a BenQ monitor many years ago that I really liked.

I tried two of these and wound up returning both due to screen uniformity issues with light/white backgrounds. I tend to split my screen into left and right hand applications (Photoshop and browser mostly). The first monitor had a 7" wide x 5" tall, kidney shaped "hot spot" on the right hand side of the screen where light/white backgrounds were much warmer then the rest of the screen, it started mid way down the screen and went almost to the bottom of the screen. The second monitor had two smaller "hot spots" on the left hand side of the screen, again with light/white backgrounds - one near the upper left corner and another starting mid-way down the screen going towards the bottom. Perhaps these monitors are better suited for true dark room work with hood attached and the brightness cranked way down OR I happened to receive two duds. Either way, I can't justify the purchase.

Perhaps I'll try another AdobeRGB wide gamut certified monitor in the future but due to budget I decided to forego it and tried a less expensive (older) Dell U2715H. While it lacks a few features in comparison and isn't constructed as well, it doesn't suffer the screen uniformity issues.

Also, this is minor in the scheme of things, but I discovered an issue with the SW2700PT on the PC after plugging in the USB cable - when the monitor is plugged in via USB (to enable the handy SD card reader and USB ports on the left hand side), Windows Device Manager shows a "USB <-> Serial Cable" device with a driver issue - see attached images. I tried the included CD and searched online for a driver, but found nothing (even after looking up the Vendor and Product IDs). I reached out to BenQ support and twice, they said I shouldn't be using a "USB to Serial Cable" and should instead attach the monitor directly to the computer via USB, which it was the whole time. This issue occurred with both monitors. Am I to believe no one at BenQ support has seen this issue?! Very strange.

19 people found this helpful

517 total ratings, 298 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

Jerry W. Vaughn

Great Monitor

Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2019

Verified Purchase

One person found this helpful

Helpful

J. Cleary

First one no good

Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2017

Verified Purchase

This is a very nice display, however I am forced to give it a 1 star review until my replacement arrives.

The first one I ordered has a small purple splotch near the bottom left - about the size of a pencil eraser. It's not huge, and not overtly noticeable, but once you know it's there it is all you can see. I know this monitor gives a lot for the price, however that's no excuse for a defect like this. I find it hard to believe when it was calibrated this wasn't noticed in QA, but alas mistakes happen and I know display panels just do not get scrutinized much by manufacturers anymore.

Otherwise, the panel looks pretty good. Very small IPS glow in one spot on the bottom. Other than that not any bleed that I noticed.

Already put in a request for a replacement, so if the second one is without defects I will update the rating.

*** UPDATE 5/10/2017 ***

Let me just say bravo to Amazon. They sent my replacement monitor overnight and I had it today after work. Second monitor has a flawless display. No purple splotch, no dead pixels, very minimal IPS glow in one spot on the top, and negligible black light bleed.

Calibrated with a Syper5 Express and ready to rock.

Updating to 5 stars.

8 people found this helpful

Helpful

PhotoGraphics

A serious look at a serious graphics monitor

Reviewed in the United States on August 17, 2016

Verified Purchase

BEFORE WE START

Important: please note that the seller has lumped 8 different BenQ monitors together on this page, resulting in reviews for all of them being mixed together. That can lead to confusion and conflicting information from well-meaning reviewers. To further complicate it the actual model number is not displayed anywhere for each review, only a generic product description in fine print called "Style Name". To be clear then the model I am reviewing is the SW2700PT 27" IPS Adobe RGB Color Management 2560x1440 Display.

MY ROLE IN THE CREATIVE PROCESS

I have owned an award-winning still and video photography business for many years, having trained at several recognized institutions. My work is primarily documentary and product-related. Precision resolution and colorimetry in my acquisition and post gear is of high priority to me. There are many brands, models and technologies of imaging devices available to the professional; however it is sometimes difficult to lock in to definitive standardization. I have used BenQ products since the late 1990’s and recognize them as a prime manufacturer associated with display products suitable for professional applications.

HOW I WILL BE REVIEWING THIS PRODUCT

This review will not be laden with specs, neither those published by the manufacturer nor those measured by me, specs and features are readily available at the manufacturer’s website. Specs are not my primary motivator in considering a monitor, any more than I dwell on specs when evaluating the purchase of a new camera. Specs don’t create art. Bluntly, computer monitors are an unfortunate but necessary tool to achieve an interim step in the process of communicating what the artist/photographer sees and interprets to the ultimate viewer. If we are to work in the digital realm we must use monitors, we have no other option, and all claims and hype from the manufacturers aside there is no monitor that exists capable of perfect imagery. When an artist/photographer perceives a nuance of a color that defines what their finished product will be it is the job of the camera, monitor, software and printing/display process to retain as much as possible of that hue so it may be shared with others. That to me is the difference between buying an $89 monitor at Walmart and making the commitment to acquire a monitor such as this and spend the time and energy it takes to fine-tune it to realize its full potential.

Specs are not meaningless and BenQ is generous with them to the degree of including a custom factory calibration report with each individual SW2700PT monitor. This is a valuable resource to give you a starting point to fine tune your specific monitor to your individual graphics card, software and output media. What is applicable to me is unique and applies only to me and my workstation. What is important is that the monitor has a plethora of fine-tuning adjustments far beyond the average computer desktop monitor.

WHY

Before even getting into specs, features and performance one might ask why spend so much on a computer monitor. These days it’s easy to buy a decent monitor for just over $100 and a very good monitor for about twice that. Why spend $650 (MSRP) for a “photography and video editing display” at all? I’ll refer back to this again a little later but the #1 reason is that photography (and graphic arts) are not about specs, features or performance. A monitor exists for the sole reason to display as reasonable a facsimile of what the photographer/artist visualizes, either at the time of creation or their interpretation of the finished product. Therefore a monitor, as a tool, must be: A) accurate; and B) replicable, i.e. it must reproduce the same tonality all the time, every hour of every day, under reasonable variable lighting conditions.

FUNCTIONALITY

Apart from the visual fine-tuning range available, the SW2700PTmonitor also customizes well physically to your workstation needs. The base and mounting arm are in a class all by themselves in terms of structural rigidity resulting in virtually no physical “shake”. That’s important, as miniscule amounts of shake can affect human perception of the sharpness of an image. The monitor has an impressive range of vertical adjustment and is self-locking and calibrated so a favorite position may be replicated at different sessions. Likewise the 90 degree swivel is smooth but tight so no locking screws or cams are needed. If it is necessary to move the monitor for any reason there is a simple push-button mechanism to unlock it from the mounting arm after which the screen portion may be lifted from the base. This model is compatible with an excellent wired OSD remote controller for menu access with 3 user-determined presets; a quantum improvement over reaching under the screen and randomly pushing tiny menu buttons as you would find on the vast majority of monitors. The wired remote may be set into a receptacle built in to the bottom of the base; a similar receptacle built in to the arm or removed completely and placed at your fingertips for instant menu adjustments.

The SW2700PT is packed with premium quality interface cables for DVI, USB, and DisplayPort and a very robust and durable shading hood that attaches to permanent mounting clips molded into the bezel of the monitor. Also included is a comprehensive version of Palette Master Element calibration software. The monitor is rated as “zero” flicker and low blue light emitting. Unique are a SD card reader and two USB 3.0 ports on the left side of the cabinet.

USAGE

This monitor is best suited for a permanent, lighting-controlled graphic workstation. I mentioned that I am using this monitor in my home office workstation. Make no mistake, work that I do away from the studio is just as just as serious as what I do “at the office”. I have been using a 23” monitor up until I tested the BenQ because I believe anything larger may be difficult to process in my brain as a finite image. Here’s an example of what I mean … hold a 4x6, a 5x7 and an 8x10 printed photograph in your hands and look at them. Your eyes perceive the entire image as a something finite with boundaries. Now hold a 16x20 print in front of you. Too large, huh? You have to scan your eyes and maybe even turn your head to take in the entire image. This is not always a good thing when you are editing still or motion photographs (video). My example illustrates why a larger workstation monitor is not necessarily a better thing. After using this monitor for a while I discovered that 27” is not too large for editing tasks, but I will say that it is the largest I would be willing to use. At the same distance as my 23” monitor (and I am unwilling to change that) I’ve learned that MOST of the time my eyes are comfortable taking in the entire image as one finite composition. The only time I find the BenQ to be “too big” is when editing purposely distorted high res video such as from a GoPro. In those cases I need to increase the distance from my eyes to the screen by about 20% more.

HOW DOES IT PERFORM

Image “quality” is very elusive to define … even under the most controlled of conditions it can still be subject to a large number of variables and therefore the degree of satisfaction will probably not be the same for everyone. I know the term personal preference should have no place in a review of a tool that is intended to render images to a certain definable standard, but in real life it does, if only to the degree that there are individual differences in how each of us perceives color, intensity and tonal balance. My vision has been professionally tested recently for my ability to perceive color accuracy and the results indicate that my vision is near-perfect. But I will wager it is not the same 24/7/365. During the course of my test period I have been very satisfied with the degree of accuracy this monitor is capable of. I have reviewed a wide range of archive images and shot some stuff specifically for comparative purposes. Posting them here would be a useless exercise so you will have to accept that I am convinced enough that this monitor will suit my needs that I will be adding it to my wish list which hopefully will coincide with a time that it goes on a Lightning Deal. For those reading my review I can’t imagine how anyone could make a final decision on something like this based on what someone else says. If you think it will fit your needs I suggest buying one and trying it before you make a final commitment.

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

I’m not sure what practical concern this would be but it should be noted that the HDMI port is Ver 1.4 rather than the Ver 2.0.

WHY BENQ

I have little to no concern what brand name is on a tool that I use in my trade. In fact I have always covered brand logos on my cameras with electrical tape so they don’t distract my subject. My only consideration for the brand name of this product is whether the company behind it is an actual engineering/development company or just a brand name slapped on a generic product. And whether the company will be there to provide after-purchase support. I have owned BenQ products going back 15 years or more and I am confident that they have the necessary experience, skills and stability to be considered one of the major players when it comes to professional display products.

SUMMARY

Should you choose this specific model of monitor? Of course that is a personal decision. Here is my professional input as a working photographer who uses monitors such as this as part of my working “toolkit”. I see the use of a monitor in photo editing as being broken down into four general levels of need, and where the user fits into one or more of those level:

1. The Exhibition Photographer – this is when I must present my work in its most perfect form, such as a display in a gallery or museum. There are criteria I must meet, some of them self-imposed, that are not cost-effective for me to do myself, or that can meet a higher standard if I work with a pro lab equipped with specialty equipment that is outside of my budget range. This is more often the case for video editing but it can also apply to my still photography needs. I don’t care what brand equipment they use, I care about the results and I’m willing to pay them for those results. Obviously for that category of work I don’t need to own a monitor (or any equipment or software) of my own.

2. My Business – this is my bread and butter. This is where I choose the equipment, software and accessories to best accomplish my highest standard of work while still running a profitable business. After careful consideration I found this monitor to be an excellent fit for my needs and it is priced at a enterprise-friendly cost. For the working professional’s studio or home workstation I would recommend giving this monitor serious consideration. When properly adjusted I consider it worthy of being called a professional photographer’s tool.

3. Enthusiast – I believe a high percentage of people reading this review fall into this category. I do when I am taking photographs not for profit but for the sheer joy and satisfaction of photography. I want my results to reflect what I saw at the time I created the photo and I think most people who invest in a good camera and a quality set of lenses are after the same goal. When you consider what you spent on your camera gear the purchase price of this BenQ monitor is indeed reasonable and is “night and day” superior to a typical run-of-the-mill generic computer monitor. I doubt if a quality-conscious photo enthusiast would be disappointed in this monitor.

4. The family snapshot shooter – frankly 95% of what I take these days for family fun time is with my smartphone and I post it directly to social media without editing so, no, this monitor would be overkill for someone who primarily takes pictures of the kids and pets. But guess what? Cell phone cameras have become amazingly capable these days and every so often I take a candid shot that knocks my socks off and I do spend time touching it up. So I would say if you’re into photography and/or video and have a few bucks to spend on a monitor the fact alone that the screen on this one is so good I would say it’s hard to go wrong, if for no other reason than the “instant” push-button profile selector.

Regardless of what else you may ever read about this monitor, words will never be able to communicate how your images will look to you (ideally of course they should look exactly like what you saw/envisioned in real life when you created the image). Whether I tell you positive words or negative words to describe how well that worked out for me what I had this monitor to use my words can’t let you see what I see. While the current selling price of just under $600 (when this review was written) may be on the pricey side for the photo enthusiast it is actually on the lower end of the spectrum compared to what you CAN spend on a display monitor if you really want to. Consider that the price also includes a three-year warranty on parts, labor, and backlight and I would consider this monitor not only an advanced and accomplished tool for the professional photographer/videographer but a good value as well.

I evaluated a new retail production model monitor that was loaned to me for a month for the express purpose of sharing my observations in a review. I did not receive any compensation, free or discounted goods, nor any special requests from the marketing company who facilitated the loaner sample and I did not communicate directly with BenQ at any time. The monitor was packed up and sent back after the short-term loan.

201 people found this helpful

Helpful

Jeremiah

Great monitor, prefect color and great features

Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2018

Verified Purchase

I'm a film photographer, and have to use an old fuji Sp-3000 film scanner to scan my negatives to digital files. The software that runs on the scanner is limited to windows 2000 and janky fuji software, and doesn't allow for any software color profiles or management. I also edit on Macs, with everything being color managed and controlled. This monitor works perfect for my needs, especially with the control puck that lets you switch color profiles with a button. The color management is hardware based, so I was able to calibrate by scanner to be as close as possible to my Macs, and I can seamlessly switch between inputs with everything connected. I actually bought this not realizing how easy it was going to make things. Color management is still a beast, but the BENQ color software worked great with my Spyder4pro, and made it as easy as it can be. I will say thing monitor is FUGLY, but that's kinda what you expect from something like this. I will probably be buying another BENQ 4k without the hardware calibration in the future for my other editing rig. The build quality is great on these things!

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Richard J.

Great monitor

Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2016

Verified Purchase

This is an excellent monitor. I did debate about getting a 4K monitor a 2K one and I decided on the SW2700PT because I didn't want to go through the extra expense of upgrading my graphics card and I am happy I did. If you want to use the Palette Master software you will need one of the following products to calibrate the monitor:
Xrite - i1Display Pro, i1Display Pro 2, i1Pro or i1Pro 2
Datacolor - Spyder4 I'm assuming it would require either the Pro or Elite.
Fortunately I did have the Spyder4 Pro which I was going to sell since I had already upgraded to the Spyder5 Elite. You don't have to use the Palette Master, you can calibrate the monitor via the graphics card. The Palette Master does not use the graphics card unless you specify the software to use it. However I have calibrated it with the Spyder5 and use the advanced setting to rate the monitor I was very happy to find it rated 4.5 out of 5. One thing about the SW2700PT is the very even illumination as well as the very fine detail. One very nice feature is the OSD Controller. Instead of using the buttons on the monitor this controller plugs into the monitor allowing to change settings via a wired remote. I only use this monitor primarily for photography but I have what some older B&W movies and setting the monitor to B&W it made them pop. Absolutely amazing picture.
I should also mention that this is my second monitor. After notifying Amazon that I couldn't get the first monitor to power up the replacement was on it's way. Great service from them.

68 people found this helpful

Helpful

Scott Kasden

Viewsonic had an excellent reputation, but from day one

Reviewed in the United States on August 5, 2017

Verified Purchase

I'm an avid photography enthusiast, and obviously take my passion seriously. Several years ago, I wanted/needed a monitor that would enable me to get the most out of my images and after a lot of research, I went with a Viewsonic monitor. Viewsonic had an excellent reputation, but from day one, I was to say the least very disappointed.

Fast forward to today. I have had the monitor for several weeks now, and have to say, I love this monitor. It plays well with i1Profiler monitor calibrator. I wrestled with the decision 2K (which this monitor is vs. 4K) but I think this is fine and I get good resolution of pics for post processing even at 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 magnification. Perhaps in a few years I'll move to a 4K if they have an updated version specific for photography.

The 2K vs. 4K debate for me is one I'm not sure how to apply to a monitor. How many K is enough? How do I take into account my sensor resolution to decide on monitor? Other issues include some 4 K monitors have been reported to slow down response, and then the need for video cards to name two. In any event, I think for now, this is a sweet spot, and I don't see any compromises.

Size is great for me, and Realestate on my desk presently won't allow for larger, and I don't want smaller.

FYI I am running the monitor from my late 2016 MacBook Pro 13 inch and all is good.

I would buy this again and would have no problem recommending it to anyone wanting an excellent tool to process photos.

Enjoy

sek
I

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

Cooney

Wow, Best Monitor for Photographers

Reviewed in the United States on July 17, 2019

Verified Purchase

Well, I did a photoshoot and got a pretty hefty bonus out of it. So, I said, go buy something you would not buy because you never have the money. I searched high and low for the best photo quality monitor there was for under $1,000. Every single site said this monitor, Style: 2560 x 1440 (QHD), was the best for photographers. And they were not kidding. The images are tack sharp and colors are breath taking. Set up was easy and fast.

I also used Datacolor SpyderX Pro to calibrate the monitor, which also worked great on this monitor.

On a side note, I wanted to pass something I read about being a photographer and it made so much since. If I'm willing to put out over $2,000 for a camera and all of my lens are worth over $1,600 a piece, why would you not put that kind of money out on the third most important part of your photography, a monitor? The most I have ever paid for a monitor was around $250. So, I bought this monitor for $600 and it was worth every penny!!

22 people found this helpful

Helpful

Catherine Singer

Love this monitor! Highly reccomend it!

Reviewed in the United States on September 27, 2018

Verified Purchase

So far, so good! The monitor arrived in the time expected. Packed well. Much easier to put together than I expected from the reviews. The light blocking panels are great! Some said they were cheap and flimsy. Mine are perfect and not flimsy. The monitor works like a charm. I am a professional photographer and edit and print all of my photographs. Love the freedom this gives me, while working on my laptop. I highly recommend it. If you're looking at other, more expensive monitors, remember, your printer, inks and your computer have limitations. Research the ability of your computer show RGB or ProPhoto RGB and your printer to print out PhoPhoto RGB. As far as the whole 4 K thing, don't feel bad if you can only afford this. Yes, it's good to be up on the technology, but research the limitation, especially with type that the 4K has, if you're not up to date with your computer.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

CPHT

Terrific...but with Quirks

Reviewed in the United States on November 16, 2016

Verified Purchase

This review is for the SW2700PT. I've been putting this through the paces to evaluate its color accuracy. Although to date I do not have need for Adobe RGB, I use sRGB for most photos and the web, and use Rec.709 for HD video editing and color grading. Although not mentioned in the product descriptions, it does also have factory presets for Rec.709 and DCI-P3 (Cinema). Surprising and nice is that there is also enclosed a document on the factory calibration results for Adobe RGB.

Subjectively, the picture quality is exceptionally nice out of the box. My task was to verify its accuracy objectively. Especially promising to me was the monitors' capability (with the BenQ Palette Master software and a supported color meter) to execute a 3D LUT calibration. This gives the hope of an objective verification capability. I first added an independent verification step in the form of the Rec.709 SMPTE color bars on a Blu-ray reference disc and a blue filter. sRGB and Rec. 709 (the standard for HD, but not UHD or DCI/Cinema-P3) have identical color space (coordinates of primaries and secondaries), so this is easy. The only difference in the two gamuts is their transform curves. sRGB gamma is 2.2 where Rec.709 is 2.4. This is noticable as a somewhat darker low end of the luminance range (dark details) on 709. The color bars test verified what my eyes were telling me...that saturation is slightly low on the presets (sRGB and Rec.709). Unfortunately, saturation is not enabled when using a factory preset profile. Fortunately, the two calibration memories do enable saturation adjustment.

The Palette Master software advanced mode permits you to calibrate any of the gamuts, and you can also select several features such as luminance and gamma. The default luminance renders about 35fL after calibration. This is very close to the professional industry standards for video color grading environments. You have the option to choose a small, medium, or large color sample mode for the calibration. This is where I discovered some issues. The post-calibration verification pass that is in the Palette Master workflow (nice touch) would fail the calibration due to excessive dE in both the medium and large options. It passes the small sample version (extensive grayscale, and the primaries and secondaries only) with exceptionally low dE. It is a bit disappointing that the larger samples would not pass. After all, that is the purpose of a high-bit 3D LUT. That said, after raising the saturation properly, the results are gorgeous, especially if you have a reasonably light-controlled room.

One downside to the process I've described here is that brightness (back light) adjustment is not enabled when using the calibration memories. You are stuck with the roughly 35fL white reference luminance. I don't consider this really a downside as it is basically the professional standard for a light-controlled room. If your goal is professional results, one should try to conform to those. If light-controlled (which includes proper level and color of surroundings), color and contrast are superb after calibration and saturation correction!

This all presumes that our video cards are outputting (or passing) color accurately. My desktop has an Asus GTX760, so I'm fairly confident it is reliably accurate.

So, with the needed tools, the willingness to work around some quirks, and a "semi-professional" viewing environment, this is an excellent color management monitor for video and photo work. And what a value!

I'd post a screen shot, but it can't do the montior's picture quality justice.

7 people found this helpful

Helpful

Celestial Lady

I LOVE it! It's the BEST!

Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2017

Verified Purchase

This is absolutely the best monitor I have ever owned in the 33 years since I first got a desktop system in 1984. I do professional book design and now I can see the actual colors that will print and/or display, particularly for covers that are used for print and also for online viewing.

The packaging was excellent. The Quick Start instructions were a little hard to follow because they were all in pictures, but it all came together well. I have never had a monitor with a hood, and it really helps. For those people who complained about the OSD buttons on the monitor frame, just use the OSD Controller puck. It makes everything as easy to access as navigating through a menu on a cell phone. Also, it helps to read the manual!

The colors in Adobe RGB are sensational and really make a difference when viewing web sites, Excel files, and anywhere that I use color. In addition, we use this system to watch videos, and the clarity and color are breathtaking. I only have been using this for 3 days, so these are first impressions. Today, for no apparent reason, something set the display to B&W (Firefox crashed when it happened), and BenQ tech support was great! The man was patient with my inexperience and walked me through the steps I needed to know to reset the color settings. I'm in monitor heaven now!

4 people found this helpful

Helpful

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

Need customer service?

‹ See all details for BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor...

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor...

›

Customer reviews

Customer reviews

BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor technology for Accurate Reproduction | Hotkey Puck Efficiency Boost,Black

Top positive review

Top critical review

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor... › Customer reviews

Customer reviews

BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor technology for Accurate Reproduction | Hotkey Puck Efficiency Boost,Black

Top positive review

Top critical review

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

BenQ SW2700PT 27 Inch QHD 1440P IPS Photography Monitor | Aqcolor...

›

Customer reviews