Amazon.com: Customer reviews: AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler

Top positive review

I am glad I waited

Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2017

Incredible value for way less than half the price. I wanted to build a computer for the work I do. Started shopping parts a couple months ago and read about AMD's soon to be released chips. Decided to wait as my work requires 3-27" monitors ( a 50" 4K and a 3-27" monitors was my goal to increase work efficiency ). I always have multiple cloud based subscription services being monitored, a couple email accounts, at least an excel spreadsheet going usually 2, a news feed, a couple dozen chrome tabs open, multiple google maps open, and every day numerous memory overload warnings, an occasional lockup......
I was shopping an i7-6900k paired with a couple 1080's.
I am glad I waited, even though I feared being an early adopter, this "built by me and my son computer" (1700 non X, with a pair of 480's, corsair 3200 LPX, Asus X370......) flat out blows my expectations away. For what I was going to spend on the 6900 alone, I bought the 1700, the 2 480's (nuegg MSI RX480 4gb $145ea after rebate) , the SSD a Hundy, the RAM a buck twenty and MOBO. The case, psu, W10, and hard drive were less than half the cost of one 1080.
Needless to say, the final cost to build was less than half to build a 6900 system, far less than half.
The expected performance for my needs has been far exceeded. I do game but I didn't build this for gaming, but it does game incredibly. The 13yo has confirmed completely.
This was my first ever computer build, I did not know how to flash the mobo with the latest, I watched a YouTube video and 10 minutes later - the mobo was flashed with the latest! I did not know how to overclock, I watched a YouTube video and 10 minutes later I was overclocking at 3.8 and 2966 on the ram.
My son, I encouraged him to help with the build, bios update, overclocking and software loading. Full disclosure- he pretty much entirely built the computer, flashed the bios,loaded the software ...... I just made sure he watched the videos and followed the directions on the videos. This has been great to build it with him as he has even less computer hardware and software experience than me. He now has real experience and confidence.
What he built far exceeds my expectations going in, we have learned just how easy it is to choose and assemble a computer (2 hours of a 13yo's short attention span and constant refocusing) load an operating system, flash bios, overclock this CPU and ram.
What a rewarding thing to do with him (second guess most steps really).
The results of the performance of this system, had I bought a twin from ... HP or Dell, I would still be raving about!
This computer build has completely blown away my expectations on not just how easy it was to build and tune, but also how it exceeds the performance level I was budgeting to spend over twice as much to achieve. Now we have a bunch of "fun money" that was budgeted for work... Our win, a trip to the beach becons this summer now.
I'll update with some pics, of the beach of course.

14 people found this helpful

Top critical review

Critical reviews›

MalibuK8

CHECK SEGFAULT

Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2020

I was so excited to have my 1700 clock to 4GHz out of the box @ 1.337V. I basically won the lottery! Come to find out almost a year later, when it is time to start doing actual production work, and using GCC; It is SEGFAULTing. This chip is completely USELESS under linux. Segfault is no big deal, they'll RMA it right? WRONG.
I heard they had a super easy RMA process; this could not be further from the truth. If you're unlucky enough to get a SEGFAULT chip, AMD will force you to pay the $100+ return shipping on a $300 chip. No compensation for the inconvenience; I surely won't get an equal replacement. Not to mention I have to disassemble the PC, throw $35 of paste out the window, wait several days-weeks of downtime, and reassemble the system using new paste (good paste can be cheap, but @ 4GHz it is not.) There is absolutely ZERO consideration for the affect of this process on their customers.
I have been on team red since before the launch of the Opteron in early 2000-something? I have never had much issue aside from TPM modules on intel platforms; the TPM is easily locked, however. I have preferred the lack of an embedded backdoor in my AMD chips for years, unfortunately this is no longer the case with AMD either. Very sad to see both manufacturers jump into the same boat on this one. AMD is quickly proving that you "get what you pay for". We will be using Intel for our critical workloads going forward, until Cyrix comes back into the fray, or a proper CPU manufacturer emerges from the dust.
I wonder, does IBM still make the POWER chips? I'd definitely consider using ISA again if it meant our labs were stable and capable of any COMPUTER PROCESSING at all, something my Ryzen chip can only seem to EMULATE.

TL;DR:
All in all buying a Ryzen chip was a waste of $1200 for the platform; an additional $200 in replacement cost, add to that $3000+ worth of downtime on the system. At the end of the day I didn't save any money over Intel when it was all said and done, thanks to SEGFAULT, and poor quality control. If you only want to use windows, and play games, you won't notice it much aside from the occasional BSOD; but the 9400F fits the bill in that case on a much lower budget. If you're doing actual PRODUCTION workloads, or want your computer, to do computer things; look elsewhere.

One person found this helpful

2,184 total ratings, 1,253 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

Skyelor Reviews

I am glad I waited

Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

14 people found this helpful

Helpful

Calico Morgan

Best Chip I Could Have Hoped For

Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

What a great price for such a beast of a processor. I was so excited to build my first PC and also use this new chipset! I liked the performance adjustments you can seem to get out of this one over the x version, so I left the included cooler in the box and put it in storage. Then I brought out my Corsair AIO and hooked it up to my new 1700. Given a high RAM diet, this chip absolutely flies. Rendering and streaming are very quick. I can stream with OBS at 6300 bitrate at 1080p60fps with NO dips in performance ever. OBS tends to be quite CPU intensive, so this is quite nice (and luckily my internet speeds can keep up).
People said this isn't as good at gaming as Intel's lineup. I'm sorry, but I just don't see it. I play all the latest AAA titles as well as competitive ESports titles at 1080p super-sampled to 4k when applicable, max graphics, etc, with no dips in performance, issues with frames, tearing, or anything but the best visuals in gaming I've experienced so far.
As I mentioned earlier, this chip loves RAM. I had 16GB of 3200MHz RAM to start, but found that I needed an additional 32GB to really max out my streaming as well as my video editing. 32GB 3200MHz seems to really keep this chip happy and producing great numbers both in benchmarks and in render times, stream reliability and speed, etc.
I have this overclocked to 4.1GHz on all cores. This was a trial though. I'm having an issue in the BIOS (ASUS TUF board) where I can't overclock past 3.65GHz unless I play with voltages. The problem is that if I change the voltages for the CPU literally at all, in any direction, the system reboots with a default speed of 1.5GHz on all cores. The only way to get past this was to use the Ryzen Master software. I actually had tried it earlier but thought it didn't work. Turns out it gives you an error saying the application of your overclocked failed, but it really doesn't. If you look at the output, your overclock runs just fine. The part of the program many people don't like is that every time you turn your computer on after being off, it resets to default speed. So every time I go onto my computer I must apply my OC before I game in order to have consistent gaming performance and streaming. I don't mind this at all though. Just keep it in mind when you get this chip.
All in all this chip is my pride and joy. I brag about it a bit because it's better than I am in pretty much every way. Paired with a GTX 1080, my system can do just about anything. Ryzen 7 1700 is probably the best chip for the price if you're looking for the higher end as a gaming/editing/streaming usecase.

7 people found this helpful

Helpful

Daniel CR

What an amazing processor, bought it for gaming but also for ...

Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

What an amazing processor, bought it for gaming but also for HTML programming (overkill for this), for gaming, paired with RX580 8GB I can get 100 FPS in battlefield 1, still need to test Doom and GTA 5 but this processor provides solid performance.

Packaging: It is beautiful, i will say this is a premium package, when you open it the first thing you see is the included cooler which is amazin and the processor very well packaged too.

Cooler included: Excellent, i overclocked it to 3.7 GHZ in all cores with this stock cooler and with max load using CPUz it doesn't go over 70 C, also the RGB is so cool. Very silent cooler too.

Performance: Solid, moves Windows 10 like a joke, you can do gaming and a lot of other tasks at the same time without losing performance thanks to the 8 cores and 16 threats.

Price to performance: I will say this is the best bang for the buck, I got it for $284 which was a discount price versus an i7 8700 which is faster in gaming yes, but it also costs $400 right now, on black friday it was for around $260 so it is a great option. A lot of ppl says this is crap for gaming, well... that's not true, it is excellent, yes, intel is better but not that much (around 10%). However overall benefit from this processor is better I think, for design and gaming balance.

Good job AMD (I'm not a fan boy, all my last 5 PCs were all intel, just giving a good review to an excellent product).

Update 01/26/2018 After 2 months of usage O can say this is solo good, best bang for the money. Run my games over 100 fps with the RX580 with no issues maxed graphics, imagine what you can do pairing this with a 1080 TI. Highly recommended.

21 people found this helpful

Helpful

Daniel S

A return to form for AMD. Killer value and great performance!

Reviewed in the United States on October 30, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

AMD is surging back to the spotlight with their Ryzen processors, providing killer value with the 1700 (and 1600) for enthusiast level gaming and productivity.

I've been using my 1700 for 3 months now and I've had almost no complaints about it. I'll outline a pros and cons list below.

Pros:
- Fast. Overclocked to 3.85 Ghz, the 1700 is more than adequate to handle any gaming experience via my GTX 1080 and 2560x1080 monitor. For 144hz or more, you may want to go elsewhere though.
- Moar Cores. Self-explanatory.
- Easy overclocking. Having Samsung B-die RAM and a Crosshair VI Hero motherboard definitely helps in this regard however, so your mileage will vary.
- Included Wraith Spire cooler is a great option for mild overclocks of up to 3.7-3.75 Ghz at less than 1.3V. However, if you want heavier overclocking you will have to get a decent aftermarket cooler.
- Ryzen Master is a handy tool to get a quick and dirty overclock, though it is certainly and obviously NOT a substitute for fine tuning an overclock via BIOS.

Cons:
- Power efficiency is not much of a thing anymore once overclocked and overvolted (not a problem for me but might be for others).
- As I said above, if you want to game on a 144hz or faster monitor at any resolution, you would be better off going with Intel. I personally don't really care about 144hz gaming so this isn't really an issue for me.
- Overclocking might have very mixed results for some people, especially if they have lower end motherboards and lower end RAM (especially Hynix. Consult QVL and Ryzen RAM compatibility threads on overclock.net and Reddit).

Specs of rig:
Ryzen 1700 @ 3.85 Ghz, 16GB G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 3200 CL14 RAM @ 3200 Mhz, ASUS Crosshair VI Hero, EVGA Geforce GTX 1080 FTW2, EVGA Supernova 850 P2, Crucial MX300 and 850 EVO 500GB SSDs, NZXT S340 Elite case.

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Tanner Lisonbee

New Price to Performance King

Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

AMD has really outdone themselves with this new platform. The Ryzen 7 1700 is an amazingly powerful processor in its price bracket, and performs excellently in multi-threaded applications. When you compare this CPU to its closest competitor in terms of performance (i7 6900k), you get about 90% of the performance for 30% of the cost (can vary depending on how far you overclock). Also, the included Wraith Spire cooler is very good considering it comes bundled with the CPU, and has allowed me to achieve a modest overclock while keeping temperatures within reason.

Coming from an FX 8350, the difference in power is astounding. A lot of games that I play used to stutter and drop frames on my old computer due to the lack of single threaded performance, but all of that has now changed. I’ve played many of these games on my new build featuring the 1700 and everything is now much more smooth and enjoyable. A lot of people harp on the Ryzen 7 series processors for not matching the ingame performance of Intel’s i7 lineup, but unless you have a very high end GPU and a super high refresh rate 1080p monitor (a situation where you need to have very high framerates constantly) you won’t be affected by this. I personally have a GTX 970 and a 1440p monitor and have had an amazing experience after the upgrade, even with the RAM at stock speeds. So just keep in mind that when you hear people say “Ryzen is bad for gaming,” that truly isn’t the case.

With any new launch, there are always going to be some issues in the beginning; as many have pointed out, this platform has some issues with not easily being able to run high speed RAM. I am personally waiting for an updated stable BIOS release from my motherboard manufacturer before I attempt to run my RAM faster than stock speeds, but as far as out of the box performance goes I couldn't be happier. Keep in mind that this issue will more than likely be ironed out within a month or two.

Overall, AMD really has hit it out of the park with this new release, and I heavily recommend this CPU for anyone who uses demanding applications, or even people who just play games and occasionally use applications that benefit from having 8 physical cores on the side (such as video editing, rendering, 3D modeling, etc.). If you are going to strictly be gaming and nothing else, maybe this isn’t the right product for you; however, in most other use cases this CPU is the price to performance king, and therefore I highly recommend picking one up.

17 people found this helpful

Helpful

Ron B

I'm hoping some fine tuning will remedy all these issues

Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

Blue screened 2 times so far, not sure if it is the CPU or other parts. Speeds seem to be ok, but in general I'm noticing some sluggishness I did not have with my 4 core i7 it is replacing. I'm hoping some fine tuning will remedy all these issues. For the price it is a good buy, and with a good cooler I hear it can clock to speeds comparable to the 1800x.

Helpful

dorkthrone

AMD is smashing it with Ryzen. Worth the $$$ for sure, no doubt.

Reviewed in the United States on June 12, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

Been using the last 4 gens of AMD in a DAW/gaming rig. AMD has always been underrated and a good value imo. Sure, they didn't hit benchmarks like the top Intel stuff especially for single core butt I have never really had an issue with them in a DAW using Cubase. For gaming they also seemed fine even if they didn't hit the top FPS like an intel.

Upgraded from FX 8350. R7 1700 destroys it all around, its not even close.

Well..... this new Ryzen gen smashes everything imo. The studio DAW has dual Xeon, I don't see any difference using Cubase with the Ryzen 1700. Zero latency, zero lag/stutter, no issues with 24-32 tracks all loaded with plugins, 8-10 fx channels with plugins, time based phase align on drum channels etc etc... I haven't needed to bounce down/freeze FX heavy tracks or anything like that. Every thing loaded, everything super sampled including a pre-master channel. So.... for $300 I think you will have a hard time beating this, at least until the Threadripper comes out.

I didn't see a need to get the 1700x or 1800x but if you want a built in stable overclock then go for it. I'm running the 1700 stock with an Corsair h115i instead of the Wraith Spire. Idle temps are 28-30c.... it stays frosty on water cooled. Before I got the AM4 adapter I used the Wraith for a few days and idle temps were 15-20c higher, seriously. It seems to want to idle around 45-48c with the stock cooler. I don't think it really matters much but if you do want to overclock I would suggest getting a water cooler, you can find Corsair refurbs cheap if you look around.

For gaming, I haven't got a chance to play anything super intense. I was playing Pillars of Eternity maxed and it was fine locked at 60fps with rx580 but that game is not resource intensive graphically. It didn't seem to really do anything at all to the CPU either, it was perfectly fine. I'd imagine that this can handle pretty much any game, especially as they continue to update etc. I played new Doom in dx12 and it was like 200fps or something lol. If you are playing above 1080p I would imagine the Ryzen processors are awesome but I can't say.

TLDR: No other $300 cpu is going to come close to this one, period. If you are doing CPU intensive things like a DAW or video editing system this is way better than the i7 7700k imo and it is $50 cheaper. For $500 or so you can completely upgrade.

r71700 w/ MSI tomahawk Arctic and Corsair 16g 3200.

6 people found this helpful

Helpful

Facelord

Truly God-Tier Mid-Range CPU

Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2018

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

My experience with this chip has been glorious. I upgraded to this from an i5 4440S, and the boost in game performance has been surprising - I didn't realize how much of a bottleneck my CPU was. It's been fun maxing out sliders in games that previously gave me choppy performance at max settings. For instance, I set the draw distance to maximum in Dying Light and the framerate is rock-solid. Bodies also don't disappear as much, staying behind and littering the streets. I'm rocking a GTX 970 and gaming on a 2560x1080 monitor, BTW.

The most CPU usage I've seen in a game so far has been a tie between Doom and Dying Light, which often stay around 25% usage but have momentary spikes to around 58% when things get particularly hectic. It's almost disappointing not having any games that max out the 1700, but when we do start seeing games optimized for 16 threads, this thing's gonna keep pace. It definitely doesn't feel like the kinda CPU I'll wanna replace in the next four years.

Unfortunately, I'm one of the few people unable to overclock this thing to 4GHz. Thermals aren't a problem with my Corsair H60 AIO, but I've upped the voltage all the way to 1.4125V without getting a stable 4GHz OC. Oh well, 3.9GHz at 1.32V is nice and stable, and it generally runs at 32C idle, 45C while gaming, and 72C while stress testing at full load. Very impressive stuff. Cinebench score was 1709, way the heck better than Intel's older 12C/24T Xeon X5650 chip(score of 1279) and even a bit higher than a non-overclocked 1800X(usually scores around 1620).

If you're using an older quad-core CPU, I'd say this is a worthwhile upgrade. Just be wary that you'll need to use DDR4 RAM, which is expensive right now because cryptocurrency miners are eating into supply lines and ruining it for the gamers.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Kindle Customer

I loved the RGB fan

Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

Upgraded from a 8320 which didn't take to any overclock over 4.3ghz, even when throwing well over 1.5 volts at it. The 8320 was getting sluggist, and bottlenecked my rx 480 in most cpu-intensive games. Aside from the rocky launch, upgrading to this was a night-and-day difference. When overclocked, this chip is held back by my 480, and during heavy gaming, only sips 40-50 watts of power according to the newest version od HWMonitor. When unzipping files, usage sits at under 10%, and the whole thing is bottlenecked by my hard drive's read speed, instead of the cpu. I'm no content creator, so I've yet to find any everyday workload that will bring the CPU-usage above 20% or so.

The stock cooler is really quite impressive. It's bulky, with a huge chunk of copper in the center right on top of the CPU. It kept my chip under 70 degrees, even at 3.7ghz. I loved the RGB fan, which is nice to show off if you have a windowed case like me. To me it's almost funny how good this STOCK cooler is, because if THIS high-quality cooler is what just comes in the box for an AMD processor, it makes it look like Intel hates you by comparison, which isn't too far from the truth.

I got it overclocked to 3.7ghz without touching voltage (stock 1.185v). it hit 3.8ghz at 1.275v, which had the pleasant side-effect of making my 3200mhz ram stable at 2933mhz (it WOULD work at 3200mhz, but would take a few restarts to post, so I just left it at 2933 for stability's sake). However I wasn't able to get my chip 24/7 stable at 3.9ghz as it wanted at least 1.37 volts, which made it run much too hot for my cooler (a Cooler Master Hyper T4). From what I've heard, Ryzen seems to hit a wall at about 4ghz, so I'm pretty satisfied with 3.8ghz. I'm sitting at R7 1800x performance at almost half the price, which is fine by me. Even at 3.8ghz, Ryzen wipes the floor with all but the highest end Skylake and Kaby Lake chips, and comes biting at the heels of the 6900k. Which is unbelievable considering Ryzen's low price tag.

As far as the problems go, there are really only two main ones. It's already been a month or so, and it doesn't look like RAM speeds will be going up for Ryzen any time soon. At least not with a simple BIOS update. You should still keep your BIOS up to date, but I think the RAM speed problem might run deeper than the BIOS. Either way, with my few hours of overclocking, I've managed to get 2933mhz RAM, which is about where speeds should have been to begin with, so my experience hasn't changed much.

The second problem stems from Ryzen's design. These 8-core chips are, in very simple terms, two quad-core 'core complexes' stuck together. And if reports are to be believed, these two complexes have problems communicating between one another, so if two co-dependant threads are stuck by windows on separate complexes, performance takes a rather large hit. I personally haven't had any noticeable problems with this, but if it IS true, then I'd have to wag my finger at AMD for having such a fundamental flaw in the architecture.

I would list the gaming performance as a problem, but nobody buys a $350+ processor just to game at 1080p on low settings, and this CPU is far from bottlenecking my RX 480, even with it's 1400mhz overclock. So this chip still gets a big thumbs-up from me in gaming.

Overall, I think AMD has really hit it out of the park with Ryzen. While it may fall behind Intel's Skylake and Kaby Lake in single-threaded performance, it's no Bulldozer, and can keep up well where it counts.

11 people found this helpful

Helpful

Jake

I think more cores is better for everyone.

Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2017

Style: Processor w/ CoolerVerified Purchase

After watching many youtubers talk about how awesome of a value the R5 1600 was, and based on current logic, it is right?, 6 good cores should be plenty for gaming and most tasks for at least another year or more. They are just now starting to use more then 4 cores now, so why not save money and pick up the 1600 over 1700. This logic seemed sound enough and I picked up a R5 1600, but before it arrived, I came across something that completely changed my mind as to the value of having more then 6 cores for mostly gaming. This quote if from the Galatic Civ 3 news page on a recent update to the game....

"What core-neutral AI means is that the game will use all the CPU cores you have no matter how few or how many are on your PC," said Wardell. We found that a large percentage of our players have at least 4 CPU cores and many have 6 or more. This meant we could, literally, cut down turn times by a factor of 8 to 12 depending on the CPU. This matters because anyone who plays these types of games know that the late game can slow to a halt. It also allowed us to develop a substantially more intelligent series of computer opponents as well as create a more life-like background simulation that the players tap into."

With the current way of thinking about cpu's, it would make little to no sense to need more cores like 8 or 10 or 12 or even the massive 16 core Threadripper that is coming out unless you were doing some crazy amount of multitasking. That is because current programs and most games are only using a few cores and therefore having a few good cores with high speeds makes the best bang. What AMD clearly knows, and all of us will soon find out, is that programs are going to start making the jump to spreading out the workload to all your cpu cores more evenly, making high clock speeds not as necessary, and being able to actually take advantage of a bunch of cores for any task by spreading out the load to all the cores. This makes a 16 core 32 thread Threadripper actually make sense, since you will see a performance boost with programs who will spread out the load to all the cores.

So what all this amounts to is that while a good 6 core cpu will be able to handle things just fine for a bit, it is not quite the best value when you consider the way programs are going to start utilizing more cores. I returned my 1600 and got me a 1700, because things are changing fast in the computer world, and I think those few extra cores are going to start coming in handy for everyone, not just those who are multitasking.

8 people found this helpful

Helpful

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

Need customer service?

‹ See all details for AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler

›

Customer reviews

Customer reviews

AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler

Top positive review

Top critical review

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler › Customer reviews

Customer reviews

AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler

Top positive review

Top critical review

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler

›

Customer reviews