Brand | Seek Thermal |
---|---|
Color | Black |
Age Range (Description) | Adult |
Included Components | Welcome Guide, Seek ShotPRO, Wrist Lanyard, USB Cable |
Product Care Instructions | Wipe Clean |
Unit Count | 1.0 Count |
Model Name | ShotPRO |
Number of Batteries | 1 Lithium Ion batteries required. (included) |
Response Time | 1 seconds |
Reusability | Reusable |
Style | Seek ShotPRO |
Manufacturer | Seek Thermal |
Part Number | SQ-AAA |
Item Weight | 7.2 ounces |
Product Dimensions | 1.77 x 4.72 x 7.09 inches |
Country of Origin | USA |
Item model number | SQ-AAA |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Ion batteries required. (included) |
Thickness | 11 Inches |
Item Package Quantity | 1 |
Batteries Included? | Yes |
Batteries Required? | No |
Battery Cell Type | Lithium Ion |
Warranty Description | 1 Year Manufacturer Warranty |
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
- VIDEO
Seek Thermal - ShotPRO - Handheld Thermal Imaging Camera and Sensor, Black
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Return this item for free
Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
Learn more about free returns.- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Purchase options and add-ons
Brand | Seek Thermal |
Color | Black |
Age Range (Description) | Adult |
Included Components | Welcome Guide, Seek ShotPRO, Wrist Lanyard, USB Cable |
Product Care Instructions | Wipe Clean |
Unit Count | 1.0 Count |
Model Name | ShotPRO |
Number of Batteries | 1 Lithium Ion batteries required. (included) |
Response Time | 1 seconds |
Reusability | Reusable |
About this item
- 320 x 240 Best in class thermal resolution - identify, diagnose and report problems faster with high resolution thermal images and video
- Seek Fusion technology - see exactly what you’re looking at with combined visible and thermal images
- Large color touch screen - 3.5" Color touchscreen with 640 x 480 resolution so you can see more detail
- Wi-fi live view - stream a live thermal view onto your smartphone or tablet over Wi-Fi
- Long-lasting battery life - best-in-class battery life of up to 4 hours continuous thermal imaging
Customer ratings by feature
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
- HIKMICRO Thermal Camera Pocket2 256 x 192 IR Resolution Thermal Imaging Camera with 8MP Visual Camera, 25 Hz, Wi-Fi, 3.5" Touch Screen Thermal Imager, IP54, -4°F~752°FFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Apr 1
- Seek Thermal Revealpro – Ruggedized, High Resolution Thermal Imaging CameraFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Apr 1
- TOPDON TC004 Thermal Imaging Camera, 256 x 192 IR High Resolution 12-Hour Battery Life Handheld Infrared Camera with PC Analysis and Video Recording Supported, 16GB Micro SD CardAmazon's Choicein Thermal ImagersFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Apr 1
- FLIR TG165-X Thermal Imaging Camera with Bullseye Laser: Commercial Grade Infrared Camera for Building Inspection, HVAC and ElectricalFREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Apr 1
Looking for specific info?
Videos
Videos for this product
0:34
Click to play video
Customer Review: Absolutely love this thing.
J. Schmidt
Product Description
Features 320 x 240 thermal resolution, on-device tools to capture, edit and analyze in the field, as well as spot measurements and temperature boxes to create Time-saving reports on the spot. Seek Fusion allows you to adjust the blend between thermal and visible images and quickly diagnose hidden problems, while Wi-Fi streaming allows you to share and stream to any smartphone or tablet.
Product information
Technical Details
Additional Information
ASIN | B07L1GN7MJ |
---|---|
Customer Reviews |
4.0 out of 5 stars |
Best Sellers Rank | #149,672 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific) #76 in Thermal Imagers |
Date First Available | March 11, 2019 |
Warranty & Support
Feedback
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers like the accuracy and value of the thermometer. For example, they mention it's an awesome device that provides quality features and good temperature differentiation. That said, some complain about the noise and charging issues. Opinions are mixed on performance, image quality, ease of use, and battery life.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers like the accuracy of the thermometer. They mention that it provides quality features, good temperature differentiation, and adequate storage. The camera is passively cooled and can illustrate the high and low temperatures on the current screen. It's able to locate heat behind walls and the ability to mix normal and thermal images on real time helps a lot.
"...It's worth bearing in mind that this is a passively cooled high resolution high range thermal camera, and if that statement alone doesn't impress..." Read more
"...Most important is it allows fixing the temperature range, which is essential IMHO. Image looks bit laggy and noisy but doesn't really matter to me...." Read more
"...Was still fairly accurate in seeing a thermal heatmap but disappointed to have inaccurate readings...." Read more
"...You can get way up close and get extremely good images of thermal variation on a 3D printer hotend or heated bed...." Read more
Customers like the value of the thermometer. They say it's an impressive device for the money. Some mention that it works well for the price and is easy to adapt to macro viewing. Overall, most are satisfied with the value and quality of the product.
"...that the "Casematrix Waterproof Thermal Imager Case" works great for the Seek Shot Pro, despite the fact they don't mention it in the description...." Read more
"...Anyway, kudos to this Santa Barbara company for putting out an affordable and surprisingly good camera." Read more
"...It is incredibly portable and works pretty well...." Read more
"...However at $600, it's definitely not worth the risk. Especially if u use this for your business...." Read more
Customers are mixed about the performance of the thermometer. Some mention that it works well, provides quality features, and is very useful. However, others say that the camera is insanely laggy and the UI is horrible. They also mention that the imaging performance is slow to update and the frame rate is horrible, making it difficult to focus.
"...The interface is a little slow compared to modern smart phones, but considering the fact the scene only refreshes at 9hz anyway..." Read more
"...Lots of fun, very useful, and worth every penny, and I have hope for a future with even better quality imagery and more features...." Read more
"...Now the fusion camera does not have a second lens, so the fusion won't work correctly, but is not needed as the IR image is clear enough that it is..." Read more
"...Couple minor software bug annoyances but will likely be ironed out. VERY happy I spent bit more for this instead of a phone add-on unit. 4.5/5" Read more
Customers are mixed about the image quality of the thermometer. Some mention that it has great high resolution images, that are very clear, and that the overlay of thermal image and regular image works well. However, others say that the image is not much better than FLIR's tiny small IR sensor, and the noise is loud. The SEEKSHOT WiFi network does not display the image or download pictures from the camera, and it does not allow landscape viewing of the stream.
"...the 149% premium to step up to the Pro is certainly worth the 240% improvement in resolution, and the 158% improvement in field of view!..." Read more
"Like the form factor, overlay of thermal image and regular image works well, seems rugged, reasonable battery life, IR resolution is good enough...." Read more
"Initial impression I like the device, the resolution is great, overlay features work well. Unfortunately let down by faulty hardware/software...." Read more
"...The images are low resolution, and the signal-to-noise ratio can be bad, but if you've got a mount and can take several images in a row, those can..." Read more
Customers are mixed about the ease of use of thermometer. Some mention it's easy to use, accurate, and durable, while others say that it'll take a lot of time to set up and the instructions that come with it are nearly useless. The interface is not quick to control or navigate through, and the app is a wonky mess.
"...Not everything is intuitive tho', and the camera comes with nothing but a little pamphlet and a USB cable (no case or detailed instructions) which..." Read more
"...What do I think of the UI? I think it's pretty straight forward and easy to figure out...." Read more
"...The instructions that come with it are nearly useless. I assume that the online instructions must be better. I started figuring it out on my own...." Read more
"...feel of the Seek Shot Pro over the FLIR C5, but the FLIR has a cleaner user interface, much better image quality and better touch screen..." Read more
Customers are mixed about the battery life of thermometer. Some mention it has super battery life, while others say it has low battery life and requires restarting frequently.
"...of thermal image and regular image works well, seems rugged, reasonable battery life, IR resolution is good enough...." Read more
"...CONS:low battery life, only lasted 2 hours or less, freezes randomly..." Read more
"...Much better than FLIR at the same price range.Battery lasts forever. The wifi is meh, like it will work but its not fantastic...." Read more
"...On board analysis is great. Long battery life, rugged, would highly recommend. If you can afford the pro do it! That said I'm happy with my non-pro" Read more
Customers are dissatisfied with the noise produced by the thermometer. They mention that the image looks a bit laggy and the camera makes a soft clicking or tapping noise at the same time the video hitches, lags, and stutters. They also say that the motion is very choppy and impossible to go smooth over an area.
"...cooled unit (big, heavy, and EXPENSIVE), it's very difficult to not bring noise in from the device itself (as it itself produces heat)...." Read more
"...The images are low resolution, and the signal-to-noise ratio can be bad, but if you've got a mount and can take several images in a row, those can..." Read more
"...Image looks bit laggy and noisy but doesn't really matter to me. Couple minor software bug annoyances but will likely be ironed out...." Read more
"...little time to adjust when you move to another target and the image is a little noise, but for detecting (in my case) overloaded electrical circuits..." Read more
Customers are dissatisfied with the charging of thermometer. They mention that it won't power on, charge, or boot up. Some say that the unit has completely died.
"...Also had an issue where one time the unit wouldn't power off, had to press and hold the power for 30 seconds before it finally shut off...." Read more
"After a year this unit has stopped charging and will not turn on...." Read more
"I received the product which was completely dead, I charged it overnight but still no life.Very disappointed." Read more
"...GREAT to use once purchased. HORRIBLE after one year. Will not charge. It stops working. BE CAREFUL WITH DECISION WHEN THINKING OF BUYING." Read more
Reviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Too Long; Didn't Read:
If you're interested in a thermal camera 'specifically' then the Seek Shot Pro is worth serious consideration. If you are more interested in building reports and fitting into the Flir world, maybe you should think about the C2 or C3, but you will be taking a huge hit on every significant feature to be part of the mainstream. Honestly, this is a truly impressive device for the money!
Background:
Right off the bat I want to acknowledge that I am not a thermography expert. However, I am an individual who has been very interested in the field since I was a child (which was a minute or two ago), and when the original Seek Thermal (now the Seek Thermal Compact) came out for iPhone back in 2015 (finally a thermal camera at a price point I could manage to afford) I pre-ordered mine.
It was both really cool and a bit of a letdown. The refresh rate (9hz) wasn't what I was accustom to from normal cameras, and between the resolution (206x156, 32 kilopixels) and the fact I wasn't used to working with thermal graphs (nor did it have any sort of mix mode) it was very difficult to workout what I was looking at. All the same, it proved to be an invaluable tool when troubleshooting in a verity of situations.
For instance, when working with computer systems and you're concerned you are adequately cooling all of the various chips, instead of having to hand check each package and move to the next, you can easily sweep the camera over the area, and any potential issues will immediately stand out. Likewise with 3D printers. It was easy to see if any component might be overheating, or perhaps not getting hot enough. Then there were automotive applications. Basically though, most systems, be them mechanical, electrical, or structural, are thermally sensitive in one manor or another. It's really nice to be able to do a quick sweep with a thermal camera and pull your attention to potential trouble areas so you can spend more time finding a solution than looking for the problem.
Impressions:
Coming from the original Seek Thermal, which I was pleased with, I am truly blown away with this camera!
Why?
One of the things I never cared for about the original Seek was that I had to hook it up to an iPhone or an iPod or something. That made the entire process tedious. First I would have to have both devices with me. Then the dongle wouldn't fit while the phone was in the case. After I did what I had to to connect the two, I would have to fire up the app, and hope an iOS update or something hadn't broken the software. So I just resorted to using it with my old iPad I never update, so I could keep my expensive iPhone in its case, but that turned into another device I needed to have. Suffice it to say, there was a lot of friction in using the original Seek. That lead to me only pulling it out when I absolutely felt I had to do a thermal analysis of a situation, even then I'd put it off.
So when Seek released a standalone thermal camera in a form-factor I liked (something about the size and shape of a quick-shot camera) I was very interested. The question then became, do I get the standard one or do I spend the extra money to step up to more resolution?
With the resolution of the original camera, which was already class leading (206x156, 32 kilopixels), and is shared with the regular Seek Shot, I wasn't sure the extra resolution (320x240, 76.8 kilopixels) was really needed. I'm still not sure the extra resolution is "needed," as in, will allow you to do what you couldn't otherwise, but BOY IS IT HELPFUL! I took a look around at various scenes and instantly could understand what I was looking at! The extra pixels and the extra field of view (57* vs 36*) resulted in a HUGE improvement in scene recognition. What was previously a chore to understand was now effortless! Which of course greatly increases both the enjoyment of using the device as well as greatly decreases the time you need to make meaningful use of it. Also, if you want to share the results, it will be even more useful when sharing with people who aren't accustom to dealing with resolution limitations.
So I think the 149% premium to step up to the Pro is certainly worth the 240% improvement in resolution, and the 158% improvement in field of view!
How about the Seek Shot vs the Seek Thermal Compact? Well the difference in terms of price is 188%, but it's hard to do a simple comparison like I did between the Pro Shot and the standard Shot. I guess it depends on how much you use it. But then, the inconvenience of the Compact will encourage you to use it less, whereas the convenience of the Shot will encourage you to use it more. So you could argue that buying the Shot will help you recognize a better return on investment, as you'll use it more. Of course, if you simply aren't going to use it all that much regardless, why spend the extra? But if you're not going to use it much why buy it at all? There is also the fact that the Shot is a standalone tool which will never be out of date (that is rendered unusable). With dongles you are tied to smart device of some sort, and you better hope the physical interface doesn't change and that the required software continues to be available and functioning. Personally, I would steer away from a dongle solution if I could. It's a lot of risk (of losing functionality altogether) and a lot of extra friction in actual use (headache dealing with it).
- UPDATE 9/4/19: There is a use case for the Seek Thermal Compact I didn't consider. You can place the Seek Thermal Compact on an extension cable, and decouple the camera from the screen. This can be useful is viewing hard to reach areas. Also, if you want to take selfies, or deal with other situations where you can't both see the viewscreen, and line up the shot. -
What do I think of the UI? I think it's pretty straight forward and easy to figure out. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles of a higher end camera, but for the money, it's impressively feature rich. You can compare regions, do min:max, get area averages, adjust your coloring, they have a mixed mode (sort of like Flir MDX) but unlike Flir it's not as much of a requirement to make sense of the scene. The interface is a little slow compared to modern smart phones, but considering the fact the scene only refreshes at 9hz anyway (a limitation the uncooled microbolometer technology that this sort of passively cooled consumer price point requires) why spend the money on extra processing power to make the interface snappier (and decrease battery life by doing so) when the device is inherently not going to be fast anyway (as a limitation of the sensor)?
Objections:
Ok, so that's it for context. Now I want to address some of the concerns I've seen placed against this product.
First is the statement that this product in inaccurate or has a lot of noise. (Separate issues, sort of, but related.) It's worth bearing in mind that this is a passively cooled high resolution high range thermal camera, and if that statement alone doesn't impress you, then you don't really understand how hard making something like that is!
This camera gets compared to the Flir C2 and C3 (which the C3 was the same price before they dropped it to compete), these two cameras have a resolution of 80x60 or 4.8 kilopixels, which compared to the Seek Shot Pro with a resolution of 320x240 or 76.8 kilopixels, are only one sixteen the resolution! Which if you don't think that resolution matters, you could always get a point measuring heat gun! Of course resolution matters a lot in photography, even thermal photography, that is after all what actually produces a picture, the available array of points which form the image! If you don't feel it makes a difference go look for images on Google that are 80x60 and compare them to images that are 320x240, and see the difference that it makes.
The next point to consider here is that the Flir sensor is only sensitive from 14f to 302f, and the Seek is sensitive from -40f to 626f. That's more than double the range. Not only that, it's an important range if you are working in automotive, or you want to inspect things in seriously cold weather. For instance, -12f happens where I live. If you wanted to watch a solder joint form (which happens between 360f to 370f).
So why do I bring these two points up in regards to accuracy and noise? Because if you don't have a cryogenically cooled unit (big, heavy, and EXPENSIVE), it's very difficult to not bring noise in from the device itself (as it itself produces heat). Of course as you increase pixel density you increase the number of chances to get a false reading (noise) as you are taking a larger sample. As you increase the sensitivity of the pixels you increase the chances of them being disturbed by something unintended. This is just like any other analog system, increases in sample size and increases in sensitivity, lead directly to increased sensitivity to ambient noise. The same basic principles apply. Frankly, it's an engineering marvel that Seek was able to bring a thermal camera to market with these specs, at this price, with this performance, in this form factor! I'm afraid some noise is going to be part of the reality of using a device like this at this point in time (until some sort of break through occurs). But then, you didn't spend $500,000 for it either! Likewise, accuracy isn't going to be as good for a unit like this as it would be for a cryogenically cooled one.
Another note on accuracy for this device. Though, (in my experience) I believe it is within its advertised +/- 2% range (or better) with its readings, I wouldn't buy a camera at this level (uncooled microbolometer) as a replacement for direct thermal readings where precision really matters. This is FAR more useful for getting an idea of what the heat is 'doing' in a system or for being able to survey a system, you know, get a "picture" of it. To that end, resolution, range, and graduation (the size of step between measurements) are FAR more important for producing that image, than absolute accuracy is. Just like how you can still make someone out in a photo, even when the colors are a bit off, or very off, so long as the image has good resolution and contrast. And I can tell you that "just" the 2.4x improvement in resolution over the Seek Thermal Compact made a HUGE difference in understanding the scene, and that is to say nothing of the 16x jump over the Flir C2/C3.
People tend to complain about the 9hz refresh rate of the camera. That is a limitation of the techology, and Flir has the same limitation with their uncooled microbolometer tech. If you want a higher refresh rate be ready to drop some serious cash!
- UPDATE 9/4/19: I discovered that the "Casematrix Waterproof Thermal Imager Case" works great for the Seek Shot Pro, despite the fact they don't mention it in the description. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B074TVN21G -
Some things I wish it had:
A way to remote trigger without touching (and thus causing movement) or a burst shot option. The images are low resolution, and the signal-to-noise ratio can be bad, but if you've got a mount and can take several images in a row, those can be stacked to reduce the noise and improve quality a bit. The picture of my cat sitting in her bed was made using this technique. A self-timer might also be quite useful (and basic).
Some mild disappointment:
The camera will not take pictures very fast. It's something like one every 5 seconds or so. Videos also hitch at regular intervals. The camera makes a soft clicking or tapping noise at the same time the video hitches/lags/stutters (pick your verb). I don't know what's causing it, but presumably that's normal? And yes, the videos contain the hitches when played back. It's not just a display issue.
Anyway, kudos to this Santa Barbara company for putting out an affordable and surprisingly good camera.
Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2020
Some things I wish it had:
A way to remote trigger without touching (and thus causing movement) or a burst shot option. The images are low resolution, and the signal-to-noise ratio can be bad, but if you've got a mount and can take several images in a row, those can be stacked to reduce the noise and improve quality a bit. The picture of my cat sitting in her bed was made using this technique. A self-timer might also be quite useful (and basic).
Some mild disappointment:
The camera will not take pictures very fast. It's something like one every 5 seconds or so. Videos also hitch at regular intervals. The camera makes a soft clicking or tapping noise at the same time the video hitches/lags/stutters (pick your verb). I don't know what's causing it, but presumably that's normal? And yes, the videos contain the hitches when played back. It's not just a display issue.
Anyway, kudos to this Santa Barbara company for putting out an affordable and surprisingly good camera.
One complaint is that the USB-C port is really close to the threaded tripod mount. It is nearly impossible to use a normal tripod and have the USB-C cable connected at the same time. The other complaint is the app for iOS is terrible. The app replicates the basics of the camera interface, but does not allow landscape viewing of the stream, crashes all the time, locks up the camera.
Also It is possible to open the stream using VLC on a computer. Once the stream is started once using the seekshot app connect your computer to the wifi of the camera, then open VLC player and start a new network stream with address rtsp://192.168.100.1/stream0
The key is you have to initialize the video stream from the app before you can connect VLC player.
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2021
One complaint is that the USB-C port is really close to the threaded tripod mount. It is nearly impossible to use a normal tripod and have the USB-C cable connected at the same time. The other complaint is the app for iOS is terrible. The app replicates the basics of the camera interface, but does not allow landscape viewing of the stream, crashes all the time, locks up the camera.
Also It is possible to open the stream using VLC on a computer. Once the stream is started once using the seekshot app connect your computer to the wifi of the camera, then open VLC player and start a new network stream with address rtsp://192.168.100.1/stream0
The key is you have to initialize the video stream from the app before you can connect VLC player.
Top reviews from other countries
Reviewed in India on January 20, 2024
The response time is a bit slow. the wifi sync to the cell phone takes a long time. The visible light camera has very poor resolution. I am not an expert on cameras, but as a user, I think the SeekFusion may come out sharp if the visual light camera was at least 5 mega or higher. I find the touch screen not very sensitive, when one is so used to the smart phones touch screen response time.
I would still recommend this product, if you are looking for a high resolution thermal imaging camera with a very economic price tag.
EDIT: Macchina prontamente sostituita da Amazon, ma grande delusione: nonostante la risoluzione più alta rispetto ad una FLIR ONE Pro da 160x120 la qualità delle immagini è molto più scarsa. Il sensore è rumorosissimo e sia l'esposizione automatica che il sistema di sovrapposizione delle immagini sono di qualità molto molto inferiore alla FLIR ONE Pro che ha solo 1/4 della risoluzione. Evidentemente FLIR ha fatto un lavoro migliore negli algoritmi di processing delle immagini e in ogni caso usa sensori di migliore qualità. A titolo di esempio riporto la comparazione tra due immagini prese allo stesso momento con la ShotPro ed una FLIR ONE Pro che costa la metà (a voi ogni giudizio). Peraltro le immagini acquisite con la ShotPro NON sono radiometriche per cui è impossibile effettuare alcuna analisi a valle delle acquisizioni. In ultimo segnalo che il menu della macchina è molto lento e l'interazione con l'app ShotPro per lo streaming delle immagini sul cellulare (Galaxy Note 20) non funziona, pur avendo aggiornato il firmware della macchina all'ultima versione disponibile, datata 2019. In conclusione: un costoso giocattolo utile per analisi qualitative superficiali (p.es per trovare perdite o per capire dove passano i tubi del riscaldamento) o come gadget per vedere animali notturni, ma assolutamente inadatto ad un utilizzo tecnico o professionale. Prontamente restituita, e da oggi in poi FLIR tutta la vita.
Reviewed in Italy on January 22, 2022
EDIT: Macchina prontamente sostituita da Amazon, ma grande delusione: nonostante la risoluzione più alta rispetto ad una FLIR ONE Pro da 160x120 la qualità delle immagini è molto più scarsa. Il sensore è rumorosissimo e sia l'esposizione automatica che il sistema di sovrapposizione delle immagini sono di qualità molto molto inferiore alla FLIR ONE Pro che ha solo 1/4 della risoluzione. Evidentemente FLIR ha fatto un lavoro migliore negli algoritmi di processing delle immagini e in ogni caso usa sensori di migliore qualità. A titolo di esempio riporto la comparazione tra due immagini prese allo stesso momento con la ShotPro ed una FLIR ONE Pro che costa la metà (a voi ogni giudizio). Peraltro le immagini acquisite con la ShotPro NON sono radiometriche per cui è impossibile effettuare alcuna analisi a valle delle acquisizioni. In ultimo segnalo che il menu della macchina è molto lento e l'interazione con l'app ShotPro per lo streaming delle immagini sul cellulare (Galaxy Note 20) non funziona, pur avendo aggiornato il firmware della macchina all'ultima versione disponibile, datata 2019. In conclusione: un costoso giocattolo utile per analisi qualitative superficiali (p.es per trovare perdite o per capire dove passano i tubi del riscaldamento) o come gadget per vedere animali notturni, ma assolutamente inadatto ad un utilizzo tecnico o professionale. Prontamente restituita, e da oggi in poi FLIR tutta la vita.
Cons: Accuracy at room temperate understates by about 2 deg C, so not useful for checking human temperatures. Sensor is rather noisy and grainy. Wouldn't bother with the PRO version. Image fusion doesn't look as good as Flir.