Buy new:
To see product details, add this item to your cart.
Ships from: Beach Camera Same Day Shipping
Sold by: Beach Camera Same Day Shipping
To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later.
To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later.
Ships from and sold by 6ave.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Added
Sold by: Hunts Photo and Video
Sold by: Hunts Photo and Video
(2860 ratings)
100% positive over last 12 months
Shipping rates and Return policy
Added
Sold by: Amazon.com
Sold by: Amazon.com
Shipping rates and Return policy
Added
Sold by: PROCAM
Sold by: PROCAM
(1584 ratings)
82% positive over last 12 months
Shipping rates and Return policy

Canon EOS R7 RF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Kit, Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 32.5 MP Image Quality, 4K 60p Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, Subject Detection, Content Creators

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 323 ratings
Amazon's Choice highlights highly rated, well-priced products available to ship immediately.
Amazon's Choice in Mirrorless Cameras by Canon

To see product details, add this item to your cart. You can always remove it later.
Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.
w/ RF 18-150 IS STM
w/ RF 18-150 IS STM

Purchase options and add-ons


About this item

  • DIGIC X IMAGE PROCESSOR: Enhances performance for sharp photos and ultra-high definition videos
  • CMOS SENSOR: Canon’s 32.5 mp APS-C CMOS sensor ensures images appear crisp
  • RF-S 18-150MM LENS: Easily attach the included RF-S 18-150mm lens to the EOS R7 camera body with the compatible RF mount
  • FULL RANGE LENS CAPABILITY: The EOS R7 is compatible with EF-S, EF, RF, AND THE NEW RF-S MOUNTS (1)
  • HIGH-SPEED CONTINUOUS SHOOTING: With mechanical shutter speeds of up to 15 fps, this camera can continuously shoot sharp images of cars, sporting events, wildlife (2), and more
  • 5 AXIS IMAGE STABILIZATION: Canon’s EOS R7 is built with seven stops of shake correction for coordinated control (3)—no matter what life throws at you
  • STAY POWERED UP: Operates using a Canon LP-E6NH battery pack (compatible with LP-E6N and LP-E6 battery packs); the USB Power Adapter PD-E makes it easy to charge the battery while it’s still inside the camera
Bites for your bracket
Get ready for March Madness Find a Fresh store

Frequently bought together

$1,799.00
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$129.00
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers.
Choose items to buy together.

Compare with similar items

This Item
Canon EOS R7 RF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Kit, Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 32.5 MP Image Quality, 4K 60p Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, Subject Detection, Content Creators
Canon EOS R7 RF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Kit, Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 32.5 MP Image Quality, 4K 60p Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, Subject Detection, Content Creators
Recommendations
Canon EOS R8 Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera w/RF24-50mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens, 24.2 MP, 4K Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, Subject Detection & Tracking, Compact, Smartphone Connection, Content Creator
dummy
Canon EOS R50 Content Creator Kit, Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 24.2 MP, 4K Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens, Stereo Microphone, Tripod Grip, Wireless Remote Control
dummy
Canon EOS R10 Content Creator Kit - Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 24.2 MP, 4K Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 is STM Lens - Stereo Microphone, Tripod Grip, Wireless Remote Control
dummy
Canon EOS R5 Mirrorless Digital Camera with 24-105mm f/4L Lens
dummy
Canon EOS R10 RF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 is STM Lens Kit, Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 24.2 MP, 4K Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, High-Speed Shooting, Subject Tracking, Compact, for Content Creators Black
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Details
Added to Cart
Price-5% $1,799.00
List:$1,899.00
-12% $1,499.00
List:$1,699.00
-20% $799.00
List:$999.99
$1,299.00-20% $3,999.00
List:$4,999.00
$1,379.00
Delivery
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
Get it as soon as Sunday, Mar 31
Customer Ratings
Image stabilization
4.6
4.5
4.1
4.4
4.4
4.4
Picture quality
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.5
4.7
Auto focus
4.5
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.1
4.7
Touch Screen
4.7
4.5
4.5
Value for money
4.5
4.7
4.0
Sold By
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
display type
LCD
LCD
LCD
LCD
LCD
LCD
display size
3 inches
3 inches
3 inches
3 inches
3 inches
lens type
Telephoto
Telephoto
Telephoto
Telephoto
Telephoto
Telephoto
zoom type
Digital Zoom
Digital Zoom
Digital Zoom
shooting modes
Bulb Mode,Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Shutter Priority, Easy, Automatic, Movie
Automatic
Movie, Shutter Priority, Sports, Easy
Scene Intelligent Auto, Flexible priority AE, Program AE, Shutter priority AE, Aperture priority AE, Manual, Bulb and Custom (x3). Movie: Scene Intelligent Auto, Program AE, Shutter priority AE, Aperture priority AE, Manual, Bulb and Custom (x3)
Bulb Mode,Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
connectivity tech
USB
Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Micro HDMI, USB
Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, USB
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
Bluetooth, Wi-Fi
USB

What's in the box

  • Camera Body & Lens

  • From the manufacturer

    Eos-r7-canon canon-r7-mirrorless-camera canon-film canon-r7 canon-lens f/3.5-6.3 image-stabilization
    Eos-r7-canon canon-r7-mirrorless-camera canon-film canon-r7 canon-lens f/3.5-6.3 image-stabilization

    Compare Products

    Canon EOS R7 camera

    Canon EOS R7

    Canon EOS R10

    Canon EOS R10

    Canon EOS R6

    Canon EOS R6

    Canon EOS R5

    Canon EOS R5

    Customer Reviews
    4.6 out of 5 stars
    323
    4.6 out of 5 stars
    371
    4.7 out of 5 stars
    1,390
    4.6 out of 5 stars
    630
    Video Recording
    4K UHD, Full HD 4K UHD, Full HD 4K UHD 8K, 4K, Full HD
    Image Processor
    DIGIC X DIGIC X DIGIC X DIGIC X
    CMOS Sensor MP
    32.5 24.2 20.1 45
    EVF Resolution
    2.36 Million Dots 2.36 Million Dots 3.69 Million Dots 5.76 Million Dots
    Continuous Shooting
    Cont. Shooting up to 15 fps Cont. Shooting up to 15 fps Cont. Shooting up to 12 fps Cont. Shooting up to 12 fps
    Autofocus
    Dual Pixel CMOS AF II Dual Pixel CMOS AF II Dual Pixel CMOS AF II Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
    Number of AF Zones
    651 Automatic AF Zones 651 Automatic AF Zones 1,053 Automatic AF Zones 1,053 Automatic AF Zones
    Weight
    Approx. 1.3 lb. Approx. 0.94 lb. Approx. 1.5 lb. Approx. 1.63 lb.
    Dimensions
    Approx. 5.20 x 3.56 x 3.61 in. Approx. 4.82 x 3.46 x 3.28 in. Approx. 5.45 x 3.84 x 3.48 in. Approx. 5.45 x 3.84 x 3.46 in.

    Looking for specific info?

    Product information

    Warranty & Support

    Amazon.com Return Policy:Amazon.com Voluntary 30-Day Return Guarantee: You can return many items you have purchased within 30 days following delivery of the item to you. Our Voluntary 30-Day Return Guarantee does not affect your legal right of withdrawal in any way. You can find out more about the exceptions and conditions here.
    Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

    Feedback

    Canon

    Canon EOS R7 RF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Kit, Mirrorless Vlogging Camera, 32.5 MP Image Quality, 4K 60p Video, DIGIC X Image Processor, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, Subject Detection, Content Creators


    Found a lower price? Let us know. Although we can't match every price reported, we'll use your feedback to ensure that our prices remain competitive.

    Where did you see a lower price?

    /
    /
    /
    /
    Please sign in to provide feedback.

    Product Description

    Capture breathtaking photos and 4K 60p videos with the Canon EOS R7 STM Kit. This Canon R7 camera’s DIGIC X image processor with 32.5 APS-C CMOS sensor takes your content creation and photography to new heights. The included RF-S 18-150mm lens along with optional mounts such as EF-S, EF, RF, AND THE NEW RF-S MOUNTS (1) easily attach to the EOS R7. With the EOS R7 digital camera’s continuous shooting speeds of 15 fps, you can shoot crystal-clear images of cars, sporting events, animals (2), and other moving objects any time, anywhere. Built with 5-axis image stabilization with coordinated control (3), this Canon digital camera comes complete with 7 stops of shake correction so every shot remains sharp. Powering up your camera is hassle-free; it operates with the included Canon LP-E6NH battery pack (compatible with LP-E6N and LP-E6 battery packs). Easily charge your Canon video camera with the USB Power Adapter PD-E or keep it powered up for use as a webcam with the AC adapter AC-E6N and DC Coupler DR-E6. The LED liquid-crystal monitor lets you see your subjects vibrantly with clear view features and an anti-smudge coating. At 1.17 lbs, the Canon digital camera fits conveniently into your camera bag so you can take it with you on every adventure. Each STM Kit includes an EOS R7 camera body, an RF-S 18-150mm lens, a strap ER-EOSR7, a battery charger LC-E6, a battery pack LP-E6NH, a battery pack cover, and a shoe cover. (1)Optional Mount Adapter EF-EOS R is required when using EF/EF-S lenses with an EOS R series camera. (2) Effectiveness varies depending on the subject. In some cases, dogs, cats or birds may not be detected, while some animals other than dogs, cats or birds may be detected. (3)When using RF lenses that support coordinated control with camera in-body IS. Testing performed at a focal length of 150mm using the RF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM lens and the EOS R7 camera.


    Read about our customers' top-rated cameras and lenses on our review pages: Compact System Cameras, Lenses

    Customer reviews

    4.6 out of 5 stars
    4.6 out of 5
    323 global ratings

    Customers say

    Customers like the quality, performance, appearance and weight of the digital camera. For example, they mention it's the best quality camera around, it'll take amazing photos and it'd be great for sports and fast moving subjects. They also appreciate the high ISO performance and the 30 fps in electronic shutter. That said, opinions are mixed on auto focus, build quality, and noise.

    AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

    14 customers mention14 positive0 negative

    Customers are satisfied with the quality of the camera. They mention that it's the best quality camera around, it'll render better with better color and clarity, and it'd be perfect for daily shoots. They also appreciate the light weight and easy to carry design. Overall, customers are happy with their purchase and recommend it to others.

    "Nice, light weight and easy to carry. 18-150 lens bundle works perfectly for my casual photography...." Read more

    "This camera is amazing. It’s 32 MP sensor gets super crisp photos. 30 fps in electronic shutter great for sports and fast moving subjects...." Read more

    "...Still more setting to try it really is the best quality camera around." Read more

    "...Vs M6mkII –The M6mkII is a nice camera, R7 just outclasses it: Better AF, better /faster/built-in EVF, better burst/buffer, better video specs,..." Read more

    9 customers mention9 positive0 negative

    Customers are satisfied with the appearance of the camera. They mention that it looks great, has fantastic image quality, and produces clean pictures. They also appreciate the ergonomics and say that the camera makes everything look a bit closer.

    "...modes which works great for dark/less light environments and pics come out really clean." Read more

    "...This camera also makes everything look a bit closer because of the cropping feature which works for most of the vlog style shooting we do...." Read more

    "it has been a good camera for me over the past year. It delivers exceptional image quality, lightning-fast autofocus, and a durable build...." Read more

    "A fine camera, images great, especially if you're used to mid-range models...." Read more

    9 customers mention9 positive0 negative

    Customers are satisfied with the performance of the digital camera. They mention that it is a great camera with unbelievable performance, it is fast, and has a high ISO performance. The 30 fps in electronic shutter is great for sports and fast moving subjects. The AF, burst speed, video, 32 megapixels, dynamic range, and high ISO provide unbelievable results. The camera plays very well with the EF 100-400 ii and has an exceptional image quality.

    "...30 fps in electronic shutter great for sports and fast moving subjects. CLOG3 for professional color grading...." Read more

    "...It’s fast, accurate, has subject tracking (people/animal/vehicle) as well as eye AF. Eye AF seems to be more accurate and “stickier” than the R5...." Read more

    "...telephoto shots with the R7, the closeups of the eclipsing sun, turned out very well, with sunspots clearly visible and hints of the lunar limb’s..." Read more

    "...I LOVE the autofocus on this thing. It's so incredibly fast. And the burst mode is nuts...." Read more

    6 customers mention6 positive0 negative

    Customers find the weight of the digital camera to be light weight and easy to carry. They also appreciate the smaller size and weight of this kit lens.

    "Nice, light weight and easy to carry. 18-150 lens bundle works perfectly for my casual photography...." Read more

    "...We wanted this camera because it is slightly smaller and lighter weight, which suits us for travel as we have a travel channel we are vlogging for...." Read more

    "...The lightweight body and ergonomics are really nice. We have it paired with a EFS 55-250 on an EF adapter and it works very well...." Read more

    "...Seems to be about all plastic, which makes it light, but it doeesn't seem too rugged...." Read more

    4 customers mention4 positive0 negative

    Customers appreciate the value of the digital camera. They say it is well worth the price, and a great investment for photography and videography enthusiasts. They also mention that the auto focus is quick.

    "...It is less expensive, but if it’s about cost I think the R10 is a better choice: better all-around specs, built in EVF (M6 EVF is optional), uses RF..." Read more

    "...Overall, a great investment for photography and videography enthusiasts." Read more

    "...camera, the sheer array of features that it includes makes it well worth the price, The auto focus is quick and snappy, subject follow allows you..." Read more

    "...It’s an incredible, reasonably priced mirrorless camera with eye detection/eye lock, providing unbelievable results...." Read more

    8 customers mention4 positive4 negative

    Customers are mixed about the build quality of the camera. Some mention that it's built well and the buttons are solid, while others say that it is not even close to the same build quality, the buttons feel cheap, and the camera has been defective twice.

    "...the R7 adds 4K video without recording limits, is a solid choice for sport/wildlife shooters wanting that “extra reach” of a crop camera, while..." Read more

    "...Seems to be about all plastic, which makes it light, but it doeesn't seem too rugged...." Read more

    "...exceptional image quality, lightning-fast autofocus, and a durable build. The fully articulating touchscreen and battery life are big pluses...." Read more

    "...It's not even close to the same build quality, the buttons feel cheap, like a pocket calculator and the "weatherproofing" is questionable...." Read more

    6 customers mention3 positive3 negative

    Customers are mixed about the auto focus of the camera. Some mention that it's awesome and quick, while others say that it at times completely loses focus and the subject completely disappears. The servo focus tracking can slow down shooting as it seeks for focus, and the rate of out of focus pictures is unacceptably high.

    "...a nice camera that plays very well with the EF 100-400 ii, even allowing autofocus, albeit slow, when coupling that lens to the 2x iii teleconverter...." Read more

    "...size is affected by ISO (larger as it goes up), and servo focus tracking can slow down shooting as it seeks for focus..." Read more

    "...features that it includes makes it well worth the price, The auto focus is quick and snappy, subject follow allows you to keep your subject in..." Read more

    "...The digital viewfinder is unable to keep up when you hold the hammer down and photographing fast moving subjects...." Read more

    5 customers mention2 positive3 negative

    Customers are mixed about the noise of the camera. Some mention that it has low noise performance at ISO 1600, and fully silent shooting with electronic shutter. However, others say that the shutter is loud, and the ISO noise is horrible.

    "...Cropped 4K at 60. FHD at 60, 30, and 24. All with full audio, AF, and internal recording. 120 is an option in FHD but without audio (AF works)...." Read more

    "...ISO Noise is horrible using C-log3 (ISO 800), even after using a corrective LUT in post...." Read more

    "...The R7’s high sensor resolution for a crop camera and low noise performance at ISO 1600 rendered great annular shots...." Read more

    "...Both would not power on and the started clicking fast and loud" Read more

    Canon’s first APS-C, RF mount camera is a home run!
    4 Stars
    Canon’s first APS-C, RF mount camera is a home run!
    No time for intros, let’s get right to it. Review of the Canon R7, which covers the pros and cons, offers advice, and has comparisons at the end.Pros (so many!)1. Autofocus– One of the best advantages of mirrorless cameras is the AF. Canon’s early RF offerings were lacking a robust AF system (R/ RP), but the R5/R6 saw massive advancements, and I feel the R7 is even better. Canon claims it’s the same AF as the R3, a camera that cost 4X more! It’s fast, accurate, has subject tracking (people/animal/vehicle) as well as eye AF. Eye AF seems to be more accurate and “stickier” than the R5. AF is at least half the reason I wanted to move to mirrorless once they started to get it right. The R7 really gets it right.2. Dual card slots –I’ve wanted Canon to put two slots on mid-range models for a while now, given how common it has become with Sony and Fuji. The R7 has dual UHS-II card slots, which can be expensive if you want the fastest versions (128gb V90 cost 90 USD). With two cards you can save redundantly, which makes it so you can use the camera with more confidence for any kind of paid work, or just keep a real time back up. It’s handy.3. 32mp – The high density of the sensor makes the detail and sharpness it can generate in the next level. Granted, the 90D/M6mkII also have 32mp sensors, but two things on that. First, Canon claims this sensor is a retooled version, that it has some performance advantages over the previous sensor. Second, those cameras do not have the level of AF the R7 does, and as a result can be punishing for shots that don’t quite nail focus. I will talk more about this in the comparisons. In short, the R7 AF pairs much better with the sensor than the M6mkII/90D, though resolving power is likely still an issue. I’m confident all RF lenses will be fine, but older EF/EF-S lenses might not be able to resolve the density of the sensor. NOTE – This is an APS-C sensor with a crop factor of 1.6. This means you multiply focal length by 1.6 to get the effective focal length (it’s actually a bit more complicated, but I want to keep it simple). So, 100mm becomes the equivalent of 160mm, 15mm becomes 24mm, 10mm becomes 16mm, etc. This applies to any lens you put on the camera, even ones made specifically for APS-C, and also applies to any formula used for factoring things like minimum shutter speed, star trails, and so on. Just FYI, as I know this tends to be confusing to new users. Crop factor makes cameras like the R7 popular for sports/wildlife as it gives extra “reach” without the penalty for using teleconvertors, and gives more “pixels on subject” vs a full frame when cropping would be likely. The high density also allows for additional cropping, and when combined with the crop factor makes this ideal for wildlife. For more info, Google is your friend.4. Fast burst – 15fps mechanical, 30fps electronic. The more FPS a camera has, the more likely you are to capture that “right moment”. There isn’t a lot to say here other than both are fast, better than almost all other Canon cameras. I do have more to say in the cons, but these are some impressive frame rates.5. Price – At 1500 USD this camera is a steal. For all it can do, this seems like a fair price for one of the best APS-C cameras on the market.6. No video record limit– Almost all Canon cameras outside the C line have a 30 minute record limit. This camera does not. It is only limited by your storage, which will vary based on the size and speed of the card used. From what I hear it also doesn’t overheat like the R5/R6 even in 4K fine, but I have yet to push it far enough to say. This is a big deal for video shooters.7. Video options–The video options are one of the biggest selling points of the R7, once you also consider the price vs cameras that cost 1000+USD more. I think this camera, or a couple of them, could make for a great, “affordable” production set-up, depending on what you do. To hit the finer points –Full sensor read in 4K, all modes (except cropped mode). Fine 4K at 30 and 24 (oversampled 7K). Standard 4K (line skipped) at 60, 30, and 24. Cropped 4K at 60. FHD at 60, 30, and 24. All with full audio, AF, and internal recording. 120 is an option in FHD but without audio (AF works). When you consider the IBIS and no record time limit, this camera is made for video as much as stills.8. RF mount – One of the most common questions I answer is “will my lenses work on this camera?” This camera can use all RF/RF-S lenses. If you also have one of the EF to RF adapters, then you can use all EF/EF-S lenses too (I suggest the control ring adapter for R7, as it lacks a third adjustment dial). Side note- all my EF/EF-S lenses adapt without issue, even 3rd party lenses. I have several Tamron and Sigma lenses and they all work fine, but I can’t speak for all third party lenses. Some might need firmware updates, and some features may not work.9. In Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) - Lenses that lack IS will be stabilized, for both stills and video (so handy). If using RF lenses that feature IS, most (if not all) can combine with IBIS to make for even greater stabilization! Canon boasts as much as 7-8 stops, depending on lens. For scale, if using a 15mm lens, 24mm equivalent after crop factor, you’d need 1/25sec to avoid shake under normal conditions. An RF lens with IS, theoretically, could be as slow as 8sec. That seems pretty far-fetched, and I didn’t get that in my test. I did get 4sec though, which at 24mm equivalent is 7 stops (2 out of 3 shots came out good). That is completely insane handheld, and would be impossible without a tripod previously, but thanks to Canon’s industry leading IS/IBIS combo, I did it. NOTE – IS/IBIS does not stop motion of the subject. It simply offsets the shake of the camera when using slower than normal shutter speeds. If shooting stationary subjects, or if subject motion is your intention, then it is a huge advantage over non-stabilized setups. If you need to counter subject motion, use a fast shutter speed. This is something I find people often get confused when they are learning. ALSO NOTE – Canon says the combo works with EF/EF-S lenses, but I don’t know the extent. I suspect not as well as RF. Probably 1 stop of added stabilization, maybe more, maybe none. 3rd party lenses likely do not gain the combo IS/IBIS, at least not at this time, and Canon will never offer support to add it. Reverse engineering will need to be applied for 3rd party lens makers to figure it out and then add it through firmware, and that could be a long time if ever.10. Other stuff –Uses all LP-E6 series batteries, but versions older than the LP-E6NH likely reduce overall performance and battery life. Light weather sealing, same as 90D (can survive light rain, but I wouldn’t risk a downpour). AF/MF switch (for lenses that don’t have a dedicated toggle). Fully silent shooting with electronic shutter. USB charging. Joystick. Multi-articulating touchscreen. Multi-function hotshoe (for the DM-E1D microphone). DIGIC X processor. Impressive battery life for a mirrorless (best I have used). Clean 4K output up to 60p. HDR PQ and C-LOG3. Vertical video embeds in the file. Adapts EF/EF-S lenses with no noticeable loss of performance. I mean, there are a lot of things about it in the good category; I can’t cover them all in this space!Cons. Most of this is “FYI”, not worth a star off. If I remove a star I will explain why. Otherwise, it is up to the user to know what they are getting and how to use it.1. Body layout/size – I kind of hate the layout/size of the R7. The 2nd scroll wheel is around the joystick instead of the D-pad. As a result I frequently bump it and accidently change my settings. There’s a lock button on top to help with that, but this is also not in the usual place (usually it’s a lever on the bottom). No third scroll wheel, it’s replaced by the on/stills/video switch. The AE-Lock (*) is further than usual from the AF-ON button (commonly remapped for dual BBF setups). All these things are contrary to the muscle memory I have developed with Canon for years, and results in me fumbling at critical moments. The grip is also not large enough. I have fairly large hands, and as such my pinky just can’t get a good hold on it, which is the most critical part of your grip. Combined with the light weight, it can be hard to balance large lenses, especially in vertical orientation. Given that it seems pretty obvious this is a sport/wildlife camera, this can be a problem. Most of these are just gripes, not really worth a star off, and a battery grip would offset some of these gripes, BUT…2. No battery grip! –Not only is no battery grip available, there never will be, or at least not a true grip from Canon. The R7 lacks all the requirements to add a grip; the battery door does not have a release, there are no alignment holes, and there are no electronic plates inside the battery compartment. I can’t even imagine why Canon omitted this, given that it is an obvious mirrorless replacement for the mid-range DSLR series (90D), all of which had battery grips! Not to mention the issues with the small body and large lenses. A camera that has a base price of 1500 USD and is clearly intended for use as a sport/wildlife camera should have a grip as an option. I am removing one star for this reason. While I am confident that at some point a 3rd party will make one, it will not be a true grip with dedicated controls for vertical use, will not have any weather sealing, will require the battery door to be permanently removed, and will never seat completely secure without the alignment holes. This is unacceptable to any serious user that wants a grip for all the reasons people want them (not just an extra battery). While I don’t normally add a grip to mid-range cameras, I wanted to on the R7 due to the ergonomics. Now I never can, nor can anyone else. Bad call from Canon on that. I’ll get over it, but if in the future they release an R7 mkII and/or some additional higher level model, they’d better offer a grip as an option.3. No ALL-I compression – I am not a big video guy, not yet at least, but what I hear from those that are, that they would prefer ALL-I over IPB. If that matters to you, then there is that. The R7 only has IPB. ALL-I is only available for time lapse.4. Buffer could be better – You’d think a camera with 15/30fps burst would have a large enough buffer to deal with it, right? Well, it’s not terrible, but it could be better. Using a UHS-II V90 card, the buffer fills after 43 shots in RAW, and 90 in C-RAW. And while that is better than all my DSLRs, the FPS rate makes the overall burst time short for RAW; about 3 seconds at 15fps and 1.5 seconds at 30fps. Not a deal breaker, you just have to manage your buffer. NOTE – This testing was done by simply setting the camera to burst mode and shooting until it stopped, not even applying AF. I used these settings; 1/1000 sec, F2.8, ISO 100. However, different settings and circumstances can alter your results. Keep in mind things like shutter speed, ISO, AF mode/settings, and even EV will have an effect on this; you might get different results in given situations. In bright light, with low ISO, I have shot as many as 127 C-RAW photos in one burst, using servo AF set to focus priority. If I increase to ISO 3200 this cuts down to 90 shots. File size is affected by ISO (larger as it goes up), and servo focus tracking can slow down shooting as it seeks for focus (especially if the EV starts to drop below 0), and both have a direct effect on the length of your total burst. It’s all a tradeoff; just manage your burst and you’ll be fine.5. Rolling Electronic Shutter –Those 30fps burst have a serious drawback. The rolling shutter is pretty significant, making this mode unusable in given situations. For anything that has quick movement you will see a warping either of the subject or the background. In panning shots, the background will appear to “lean” counter to the pan direction. Objects moving fast will warp, IE, a ball being kicked will appear egg-shaped rather than round. I don’t think it’s worth a star off, since rolling shutter is an issue for basically all cameras with an electronic shutter mode; some just mitigate it better. Until true global shutters exist it likely will continue to be this way. Just use mechanical in these situations; 15fps is more than enough. 7-10fps was considered good for action previously, and when I had cameras in that range I still got plenty of “the right moment” keepers.6. Not the 7D replacement– The build, sealing, and lack of a battery grip, all make the R7 fall short of this mark. Many of us were expecting a mirrorless 7D (hence the name R7), and feature wise it does outclass that series. But the 7D is more than just a feature rich camera. It’s legendary for its build quality; testimonies to its seeming indestructibility are plentiful. At 1500 USD though, the R7 holds up. To be what many of us hoped for it would cost at least 2000 USD. I don’t think Canon is interested in that market just yet. From their end, this was the better move at this time. We might still see a higher level APS-C that has that tougher build and a grip option, but not for a while. I’d guess at least 2 years, if ever.7. Other stuff – AA filter (I would like to have seen Canon drop that). Shutter is loud (not as loud as a mirrorbox, but noticeably louder than my R5/R6). EVF isn’t as smooth as it could be (not as smooth as my R5, about the same as my R6). Hotshoe microphone is very expensive (300 USD). Not a lot of RF-S lenses, yet. No top screen. No lock on Mode dial. Really, there are not a lot of cons, and most are just gripes. The lack of a grip is the only one I deem serious enough to remove a star, and not everyone cares about that.ConclusionsWhat a camera! The pros are many and the cons few. At the price of 1500 USD, the R7 adds 4K video without recording limits, is a solid choice for sport/wildlife shooters wanting that “extra reach” of a crop camera, while also being great for pretty much everything else. I can’t find a lot of reasons to say no to the R7. If Canon hadn’t omitted the grip, it would be 5 stars. As is, I rate the R7 4 stars, which is still a very solid offering for what it cost.ComparisonsVs 90D – To me, the R7 is to RF what the 90D is to EF, not just because the 32mp sensor. The price and feature set, when compared to higher class cameras, scale pretty well the same. Side by side, there is no reason to mince words; the R7 just all around beats the 90D in everything, save for a few things. 90D is cheaper at 1200 USD. 90D has better ergonomics; the grip is beefy enough to hold steady even in large hands. 90D battery life is better and can add a battery grip to make it even better in this regard, which also offsets balance issues with large lenses in relation to ergonomics. The view finder is worth a mention, as some still prefer an OVF for action (EVF can lag). Otherwise, R7 AF destroys the 90D AF. The AF system of the 90D has always been its biggest complaint from users; Canon really should have used the AF from the 7DmkII. It isn’t useless, but with 10fps burst the 90D AF can struggle to keep up, and at 32mp even slight missed focus is noticeable. I had plenty of keepers on the 90D, but admittedly it was hit or miss. When it hit, it was like no other camera I ever owned. When it missed, it was frustrating. The R7 AF by itself is a reason to trade up if you are struggling with the 90D. Dual cards, IBIS, and better video features are icing on the cake. If you have a 90D and are doing well with it, keep it. It’s still a capable camera. If you are struggling with AF, R7 is a better choice. If you want unlimited recording and/or 4K60, the R7 has that and the 90D does not. If you don’t have either, then I would say the R7is a smarter move at this point.Vs 7DmkII- The R7 outclasses the 7D in features all the way around. The 7D compares similar to the 90D vs R7, but has a stronger build and dual slots. If you need an APS-C that can be used in some pretty bad conditions, the 7DmkII is still the king of taking a beating. Otherwise, AF, burst speed, video, 32mp, dynamic range, high ISO performance, and overall features beat the 7DmkII.Vs M6mkII –The M6mkII is a nice camera, R7 just outclasses it: Better AF, better /faster/built-in EVF, better burst/buffer, better video specs, better battery life, dual cards, IBIS, etc. The M6mkII has a smaller form factor and a flip up screen (some prefer that), that’s about it. It is less expensive, but if it’s about cost I think the R10 is a better choice: better all-around specs, built in EVF (M6 EVF is optional), uses RF/RF-S lenses, for a comparable price. M series was good, still is, but I think the death knell is playing for it. RF is the future, M is on its way out. I just can’t suggest an M camera at this point unless you really want that smaller build.Vs R10- I feel this is an important comparison, as both cameras are RF APS-C cameras released 1 month apart. In short, R7 wins the overall comparison, but for its price the R10 is pretty impressive. For 980 USD, you still get 15fps burst, 4K30/24 full read, 4K60 cropped, FHD 120, same AF, no record limit, same lens compatibility. You lose IBIS, bigger battery, C-LOG, dual cards, 40K60 full read, headphone jack, better build, sealing, better EVF, better buffer, really there’s a lot but these are the things I think are most notable, and are all things that can be deal breakers to those that know why they want/need them. I think the R10 is currently the best “entry” level camera for people that want to move up from their smart phone to something that can change lenses and offers more overall control, while retaining some of the best features of the R7 without having to pay 1500 USD. It’s a camera that can do a lot for what it cost, and might suit you fine. To be fair, 24mp will be much more forgiving than 32mp for people still learning the game (resolving power). I’d like to do a full review, to lay out a better explanation of what it can do.Vs R/RP- Price is why I want to compare these. Both are full frame RF cameras that have a price that is similar enough to the R7 where I think people will ask “why a crop over a full frame at that price?” In short terms, the R7 is a performance camera where the R/RP are not. Their only functional advantage is their sensor size, which is worth a mention. If doing portrait work, a full frame is a better place to start, as the larger sensor offers a cleaner image and more background blur. R7 can do portraits too, just saying a full frame typically is better due to the way crop factor affects framing and distance to subject (be sure to consider crop when choosing lenses). If doing paid work, R7 might be better as it has dual cards (R/RP do not). R7 otherwise does more, especially for action (R/RP AF is weak for action).Vs R5/R6 – You would choose the R7 over the R5/R6 for these reasons: You want a performance camera with a crop sensor to get more reach out of your lenses for sports/wildlife. You want a video camera with 4K60, unlimited recording, and doesn’t overheat. R7 has some advantages, given its price, but let’s not mince words; the R5/R6 are top end, full frame cameras. I take my R5/R6 to every paid event. The R7 is my wildlife camera.Keep in mind this is not a review for these other cameras. There’s any number of things I would say about them in a full review. I am adding the info for people that might be asking “why the R7?”That’s all I got! All that is left is to check out the images. Thank you for reading my review! If you found it helpful please remember to hit the helpful button. Take care!
    Thank you for your feedback
    Sorry, there was an error
    Sorry we couldn't load the review

    Top reviews from the United States

    Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2024
    Style: w/ RF 18-150 IS STMSet: w/ RF 18-150 IS STMVerified Purchase
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on February 17, 2024
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    One person found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on September 30, 2023
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2023
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    3 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2023
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    Customer image
    4.0 out of 5 stars Canon’s first APS-C, RF mount camera is a home run!
    Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2023
    No time for intros, let’s get right to it. Review of the Canon R7, which covers the pros and cons, offers advice, and has comparisons at the end.

    Pros (so many!)
    1. Autofocus– One of the best advantages of mirrorless cameras is the AF. Canon’s early RF offerings were lacking a robust AF system (R/ RP), but the R5/R6 saw massive advancements, and I feel the R7 is even better. Canon claims it’s the same AF as the R3, a camera that cost 4X more! It’s fast, accurate, has subject tracking (people/animal/vehicle) as well as eye AF. Eye AF seems to be more accurate and “stickier” than the R5. AF is at least half the reason I wanted to move to mirrorless once they started to get it right. The R7 really gets it right.
    2. Dual card slots –I’ve wanted Canon to put two slots on mid-range models for a while now, given how common it has become with Sony and Fuji. The R7 has dual UHS-II card slots, which can be expensive if you want the fastest versions (128gb V90 cost 90 USD). With two cards you can save redundantly, which makes it so you can use the camera with more confidence for any kind of paid work, or just keep a real time back up. It’s handy.
    3. 32mp – The high density of the sensor makes the detail and sharpness it can generate in the next level. Granted, the 90D/M6mkII also have 32mp sensors, but two things on that. First, Canon claims this sensor is a retooled version, that it has some performance advantages over the previous sensor. Second, those cameras do not have the level of AF the R7 does, and as a result can be punishing for shots that don’t quite nail focus. I will talk more about this in the comparisons. In short, the R7 AF pairs much better with the sensor than the M6mkII/90D, though resolving power is likely still an issue. I’m confident all RF lenses will be fine, but older EF/EF-S lenses might not be able to resolve the density of the sensor. NOTE – This is an APS-C sensor with a crop factor of 1.6. This means you multiply focal length by 1.6 to get the effective focal length (it’s actually a bit more complicated, but I want to keep it simple). So, 100mm becomes the equivalent of 160mm, 15mm becomes 24mm, 10mm becomes 16mm, etc. This applies to any lens you put on the camera, even ones made specifically for APS-C, and also applies to any formula used for factoring things like minimum shutter speed, star trails, and so on. Just FYI, as I know this tends to be confusing to new users. Crop factor makes cameras like the R7 popular for sports/wildlife as it gives extra “reach” without the penalty for using teleconvertors, and gives more “pixels on subject” vs a full frame when cropping would be likely. The high density also allows for additional cropping, and when combined with the crop factor makes this ideal for wildlife. For more info, Google is your friend.
    4. Fast burst – 15fps mechanical, 30fps electronic. The more FPS a camera has, the more likely you are to capture that “right moment”. There isn’t a lot to say here other than both are fast, better than almost all other Canon cameras. I do have more to say in the cons, but these are some impressive frame rates.
    5. Price – At 1500 USD this camera is a steal. For all it can do, this seems like a fair price for one of the best APS-C cameras on the market.
    6. No video record limit– Almost all Canon cameras outside the C line have a 30 minute record limit. This camera does not. It is only limited by your storage, which will vary based on the size and speed of the card used. From what I hear it also doesn’t overheat like the R5/R6 even in 4K fine, but I have yet to push it far enough to say. This is a big deal for video shooters.
    7. Video options–The video options are one of the biggest selling points of the R7, once you also consider the price vs cameras that cost 1000+USD more. I think this camera, or a couple of them, could make for a great, “affordable” production set-up, depending on what you do. To hit the finer points –Full sensor read in 4K, all modes (except cropped mode). Fine 4K at 30 and 24 (oversampled 7K). Standard 4K (line skipped) at 60, 30, and 24. Cropped 4K at 60. FHD at 60, 30, and 24. All with full audio, AF, and internal recording. 120 is an option in FHD but without audio (AF works). When you consider the IBIS and no record time limit, this camera is made for video as much as stills.
    8. RF mount – One of the most common questions I answer is “will my lenses work on this camera?” This camera can use all RF/RF-S lenses. If you also have one of the EF to RF adapters, then you can use all EF/EF-S lenses too (I suggest the control ring adapter for R7, as it lacks a third adjustment dial). Side note- all my EF/EF-S lenses adapt without issue, even 3rd party lenses. I have several Tamron and Sigma lenses and they all work fine, but I can’t speak for all third party lenses. Some might need firmware updates, and some features may not work.
    9. In Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) - Lenses that lack IS will be stabilized, for both stills and video (so handy). If using RF lenses that feature IS, most (if not all) can combine with IBIS to make for even greater stabilization! Canon boasts as much as 7-8 stops, depending on lens. For scale, if using a 15mm lens, 24mm equivalent after crop factor, you’d need 1/25sec to avoid shake under normal conditions. An RF lens with IS, theoretically, could be as slow as 8sec. That seems pretty far-fetched, and I didn’t get that in my test. I did get 4sec though, which at 24mm equivalent is 7 stops (2 out of 3 shots came out good). That is completely insane handheld, and would be impossible without a tripod previously, but thanks to Canon’s industry leading IS/IBIS combo, I did it. NOTE – IS/IBIS does not stop motion of the subject. It simply offsets the shake of the camera when using slower than normal shutter speeds. If shooting stationary subjects, or if subject motion is your intention, then it is a huge advantage over non-stabilized setups. If you need to counter subject motion, use a fast shutter speed. This is something I find people often get confused when they are learning. ALSO NOTE – Canon says the combo works with EF/EF-S lenses, but I don’t know the extent. I suspect not as well as RF. Probably 1 stop of added stabilization, maybe more, maybe none. 3rd party lenses likely do not gain the combo IS/IBIS, at least not at this time, and Canon will never offer support to add it. Reverse engineering will need to be applied for 3rd party lens makers to figure it out and then add it through firmware, and that could be a long time if ever.
    10. Other stuff –Uses all LP-E6 series batteries, but versions older than the LP-E6NH likely reduce overall performance and battery life. Light weather sealing, same as 90D (can survive light rain, but I wouldn’t risk a downpour). AF/MF switch (for lenses that don’t have a dedicated toggle). Fully silent shooting with electronic shutter. USB charging. Joystick. Multi-articulating touchscreen. Multi-function hotshoe (for the DM-E1D microphone). DIGIC X processor. Impressive battery life for a mirrorless (best I have used). Clean 4K output up to 60p. HDR PQ and C-LOG3. Vertical video embeds in the file. Adapts EF/EF-S lenses with no noticeable loss of performance. I mean, there are a lot of things about it in the good category; I can’t cover them all in this space!

    Cons. Most of this is “FYI”, not worth a star off. If I remove a star I will explain why. Otherwise, it is up to the user to know what they are getting and how to use it.
    1. Body layout/size – I kind of hate the layout/size of the R7. The 2nd scroll wheel is around the joystick instead of the D-pad. As a result I frequently bump it and accidently change my settings. There’s a lock button on top to help with that, but this is also not in the usual place (usually it’s a lever on the bottom). No third scroll wheel, it’s replaced by the on/stills/video switch. The AE-Lock (*) is further than usual from the AF-ON button (commonly remapped for dual BBF setups). All these things are contrary to the muscle memory I have developed with Canon for years, and results in me fumbling at critical moments. The grip is also not large enough. I have fairly large hands, and as such my pinky just can’t get a good hold on it, which is the most critical part of your grip. Combined with the light weight, it can be hard to balance large lenses, especially in vertical orientation. Given that it seems pretty obvious this is a sport/wildlife camera, this can be a problem. Most of these are just gripes, not really worth a star off, and a battery grip would offset some of these gripes, BUT…
    2. No battery grip! –Not only is no battery grip available, there never will be, or at least not a true grip from Canon. The R7 lacks all the requirements to add a grip; the battery door does not have a release, there are no alignment holes, and there are no electronic plates inside the battery compartment. I can’t even imagine why Canon omitted this, given that it is an obvious mirrorless replacement for the mid-range DSLR series (90D), all of which had battery grips! Not to mention the issues with the small body and large lenses. A camera that has a base price of 1500 USD and is clearly intended for use as a sport/wildlife camera should have a grip as an option. I am removing one star for this reason. While I am confident that at some point a 3rd party will make one, it will not be a true grip with dedicated controls for vertical use, will not have any weather sealing, will require the battery door to be permanently removed, and will never seat completely secure without the alignment holes. This is unacceptable to any serious user that wants a grip for all the reasons people want them (not just an extra battery). While I don’t normally add a grip to mid-range cameras, I wanted to on the R7 due to the ergonomics. Now I never can, nor can anyone else. Bad call from Canon on that. I’ll get over it, but if in the future they release an R7 mkII and/or some additional higher level model, they’d better offer a grip as an option.
    3. No ALL-I compression – I am not a big video guy, not yet at least, but what I hear from those that are, that they would prefer ALL-I over IPB. If that matters to you, then there is that. The R7 only has IPB. ALL-I is only available for time lapse.
    4. Buffer could be better – You’d think a camera with 15/30fps burst would have a large enough buffer to deal with it, right? Well, it’s not terrible, but it could be better. Using a UHS-II V90 card, the buffer fills after 43 shots in RAW, and 90 in C-RAW. And while that is better than all my DSLRs, the FPS rate makes the overall burst time short for RAW; about 3 seconds at 15fps and 1.5 seconds at 30fps. Not a deal breaker, you just have to manage your buffer. NOTE – This testing was done by simply setting the camera to burst mode and shooting until it stopped, not even applying AF. I used these settings; 1/1000 sec, F2.8, ISO 100. However, different settings and circumstances can alter your results. Keep in mind things like shutter speed, ISO, AF mode/settings, and even EV will have an effect on this; you might get different results in given situations. In bright light, with low ISO, I have shot as many as 127 C-RAW photos in one burst, using servo AF set to focus priority. If I increase to ISO 3200 this cuts down to 90 shots. File size is affected by ISO (larger as it goes up), and servo focus tracking can slow down shooting as it seeks for focus (especially if the EV starts to drop below 0), and both have a direct effect on the length of your total burst. It’s all a tradeoff; just manage your burst and you’ll be fine.
    5. Rolling Electronic Shutter –Those 30fps burst have a serious drawback. The rolling shutter is pretty significant, making this mode unusable in given situations. For anything that has quick movement you will see a warping either of the subject or the background. In panning shots, the background will appear to “lean” counter to the pan direction. Objects moving fast will warp, IE, a ball being kicked will appear egg-shaped rather than round. I don’t think it’s worth a star off, since rolling shutter is an issue for basically all cameras with an electronic shutter mode; some just mitigate it better. Until true global shutters exist it likely will continue to be this way. Just use mechanical in these situations; 15fps is more than enough. 7-10fps was considered good for action previously, and when I had cameras in that range I still got plenty of “the right moment” keepers.
    6. Not the 7D replacement– The build, sealing, and lack of a battery grip, all make the R7 fall short of this mark. Many of us were expecting a mirrorless 7D (hence the name R7), and feature wise it does outclass that series. But the 7D is more than just a feature rich camera. It’s legendary for its build quality; testimonies to its seeming indestructibility are plentiful. At 1500 USD though, the R7 holds up. To be what many of us hoped for it would cost at least 2000 USD. I don’t think Canon is interested in that market just yet. From their end, this was the better move at this time. We might still see a higher level APS-C that has that tougher build and a grip option, but not for a while. I’d guess at least 2 years, if ever.
    7. Other stuff – AA filter (I would like to have seen Canon drop that). Shutter is loud (not as loud as a mirrorbox, but noticeably louder than my R5/R6). EVF isn’t as smooth as it could be (not as smooth as my R5, about the same as my R6). Hotshoe microphone is very expensive (300 USD). Not a lot of RF-S lenses, yet. No top screen. No lock on Mode dial. Really, there are not a lot of cons, and most are just gripes. The lack of a grip is the only one I deem serious enough to remove a star, and not everyone cares about that.

    Conclusions
    What a camera! The pros are many and the cons few. At the price of 1500 USD, the R7 adds 4K video without recording limits, is a solid choice for sport/wildlife shooters wanting that “extra reach” of a crop camera, while also being great for pretty much everything else. I can’t find a lot of reasons to say no to the R7. If Canon hadn’t omitted the grip, it would be 5 stars. As is, I rate the R7 4 stars, which is still a very solid offering for what it cost.

    Comparisons
    Vs 90D – To me, the R7 is to RF what the 90D is to EF, not just because the 32mp sensor. The price and feature set, when compared to higher class cameras, scale pretty well the same. Side by side, there is no reason to mince words; the R7 just all around beats the 90D in everything, save for a few things. 90D is cheaper at 1200 USD. 90D has better ergonomics; the grip is beefy enough to hold steady even in large hands. 90D battery life is better and can add a battery grip to make it even better in this regard, which also offsets balance issues with large lenses in relation to ergonomics. The view finder is worth a mention, as some still prefer an OVF for action (EVF can lag). Otherwise, R7 AF destroys the 90D AF. The AF system of the 90D has always been its biggest complaint from users; Canon really should have used the AF from the 7DmkII. It isn’t useless, but with 10fps burst the 90D AF can struggle to keep up, and at 32mp even slight missed focus is noticeable. I had plenty of keepers on the 90D, but admittedly it was hit or miss. When it hit, it was like no other camera I ever owned. When it missed, it was frustrating. The R7 AF by itself is a reason to trade up if you are struggling with the 90D. Dual cards, IBIS, and better video features are icing on the cake. If you have a 90D and are doing well with it, keep it. It’s still a capable camera. If you are struggling with AF, R7 is a better choice. If you want unlimited recording and/or 4K60, the R7 has that and the 90D does not. If you don’t have either, then I would say the R7is a smarter move at this point.

    Vs 7DmkII- The R7 outclasses the 7D in features all the way around. The 7D compares similar to the 90D vs R7, but has a stronger build and dual slots. If you need an APS-C that can be used in some pretty bad conditions, the 7DmkII is still the king of taking a beating. Otherwise, AF, burst speed, video, 32mp, dynamic range, high ISO performance, and overall features beat the 7DmkII.

    Vs M6mkII –The M6mkII is a nice camera, R7 just outclasses it: Better AF, better /faster/built-in EVF, better burst/buffer, better video specs, better battery life, dual cards, IBIS, etc. The M6mkII has a smaller form factor and a flip up screen (some prefer that), that’s about it. It is less expensive, but if it’s about cost I think the R10 is a better choice: better all-around specs, built in EVF (M6 EVF is optional), uses RF/RF-S lenses, for a comparable price. M series was good, still is, but I think the death knell is playing for it. RF is the future, M is on its way out. I just can’t suggest an M camera at this point unless you really want that smaller build.

    Vs R10- I feel this is an important comparison, as both cameras are RF APS-C cameras released 1 month apart. In short, R7 wins the overall comparison, but for its price the R10 is pretty impressive. For 980 USD, you still get 15fps burst, 4K30/24 full read, 4K60 cropped, FHD 120, same AF, no record limit, same lens compatibility. You lose IBIS, bigger battery, C-LOG, dual cards, 40K60 full read, headphone jack, better build, sealing, better EVF, better buffer, really there’s a lot but these are the things I think are most notable, and are all things that can be deal breakers to those that know why they want/need them. I think the R10 is currently the best “entry” level camera for people that want to move up from their smart phone to something that can change lenses and offers more overall control, while retaining some of the best features of the R7 without having to pay 1500 USD. It’s a camera that can do a lot for what it cost, and might suit you fine. To be fair, 24mp will be much more forgiving than 32mp for people still learning the game (resolving power). I’d like to do a full review, to lay out a better explanation of what it can do.

    Vs R/RP- Price is why I want to compare these. Both are full frame RF cameras that have a price that is similar enough to the R7 where I think people will ask “why a crop over a full frame at that price?” In short terms, the R7 is a performance camera where the R/RP are not. Their only functional advantage is their sensor size, which is worth a mention. If doing portrait work, a full frame is a better place to start, as the larger sensor offers a cleaner image and more background blur. R7 can do portraits too, just saying a full frame typically is better due to the way crop factor affects framing and distance to subject (be sure to consider crop when choosing lenses). If doing paid work, R7 might be better as it has dual cards (R/RP do not). R7 otherwise does more, especially for action (R/RP AF is weak for action).

    Vs R5/R6 – You would choose the R7 over the R5/R6 for these reasons: You want a performance camera with a crop sensor to get more reach out of your lenses for sports/wildlife. You want a video camera with 4K60, unlimited recording, and doesn’t overheat. R7 has some advantages, given its price, but let’s not mince words; the R5/R6 are top end, full frame cameras. I take my R5/R6 to every paid event. The R7 is my wildlife camera.

    Keep in mind this is not a review for these other cameras. There’s any number of things I would say about them in a full review. I am adding the info for people that might be asking “why the R7?”

    That’s all I got! All that is left is to check out the images. Thank you for reading my review! If you found it helpful please remember to hit the helpful button. Take care!
    Images in this review
    Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image Customer image
    Customer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer imageCustomer image
    443 people found this helpful
    Report
    Reviewed in the United States on November 21, 2023
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    8 people found this helpful
    Report

    Top reviews from other countries

    Translate all reviews to English
    Edgar
    5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente!
    Reviewed in Mexico on March 13, 2024
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    Customer image
    Edgar
    5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente!
    Reviewed in Mexico on March 13, 2024
    Llegó antes de lo estimado aún siendo importado de USA a México y en excelentes condiciones y mucho más barata que en la página oficial de canon o que en mercado libre, casi $5k menos… ampliamente recomendado este vendedor!
    Images in this review
    Customer image Customer image Customer image
    Customer imageCustomer imageCustomer image
    One person found this helpful
    Report
    Keith
    5.0 out of 5 stars I would have switched to mirrorless camera sooner
    Reviewed in Canada on February 7, 2024
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    One person found this helpful
    Report
    Sussumu Yamada
    4.0 out of 5 stars Ótima opção para fotos da natureza e videos em geral
    Reviewed in Brazil on December 15, 2023
    Style: Body OnlySet: BodyVerified Purchase
    Customer image
    Sussumu Yamada
    4.0 out of 5 stars Ótima opção para fotos da natureza e videos em geral
    Reviewed in Brazil on December 15, 2023
    Comprei principalmente para fotos de pássaros, em substituição ao DSLR 6D. Escolhi um modelo APS-C pelo aumento adicional de alcance para a minha lente 150-600mm, que passa a ser equivalente a uma 960mm, um belo ganho. O adaptador EF-EOS R (adquirido à parte) funcionou muito bem e não trouxe prejuízo nem ao autofoco e nem à entrada de luz.
    Além do ganho no alcance, é uma máquina bem mais moderna que a anterior e tem muitos recursos que ainda estou explorando. A qualidade do video é fantástica e a estabilização no sensor funciona muito bem. A velocidade de fotos por segundo também é muito boa e ajuda bem na captura de aves em vôo.
    A perda que mais me incomoda em relação à minha fullframe é, evidentemente, o desempenho com pouca luz e ISO alto. A imagem fica muito ruidosa e tenho que limitar o ISO a, no máximo, 3200 já aceitando um alto nível de ruído. Também sinto falta do viewfinder ótico, mas isso é um caminho sem volta, acho que terei que aceitar que as máquinas sem espelho terão viewfinder eletrônico.
    No geral, estou satisfeito com a compra. Ainda acho que esse tipo de equipamento é muito caro no Brasil, comparados com preços praticados no exterior.
    Images in this review
    Customer image Customer image
    Customer imageCustomer image
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
    Arturo F.
    5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente
    Reviewed in Mexico on December 9, 2023
    Style: w/ RF 18-150 IS STMSet: w/ RF 18-150 IS STMVerified Purchase
    Michele R.
    5.0 out of 5 stars Amazing!....one con
    Reviewed in Canada on February 26, 2023
    Style: w/ RF 18-150 IS STMSet: w/ RF 18-150 IS STMVerified Purchase
    One person found this helpful
    Report