Max Screen Resolution | 4096 x 2160 |
---|---|
Memory Speed | 7010 MHz |
Graphics Coprocessor | Nvidia GeForce |
Chipset Brand | NVIDIA |
Card Description | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
Graphics Card Ram Size | 6 GB |
EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB SC GAMING ACX 2.0+, Whisper Silent Cooling Graphics Card 06G-P4-4993-KR
Graphics Coprocessor | Nvidia GeForce |
Brand | EVGA |
Graphics Ram Size | 6 GB |
GPU Clock Speed | 1102 MHz |
Video Output Interface | HDMI |
About this item
- Virtual Reality Ready
- Great for 4K (GeForce GTX 980 Ti & above)
- DirectX12 Ready
- Gamestream to NVIDIA SHIELD
- EVGA "ACX 2.0+" Cooling Technology - Fine-Tuned to Perfection
- EVGA's 24/7 Technical Support; Base Clock: 1102 MHz / Boost Clock: 1190 MHz
- Memory Clock: 7010 MHz Effective; CUDA Cores: 2816; Memory Detail: 6144MB GDDR5
- Recommended PSU: 600W or greater power supply
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Compare with similar items
This Item EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB SC GAMING ACX 2.0+, Whisper Silent Cooling Graphics Card 06G-P4-4993-KR | Recommendations | dummy | dummy | |
Try again! Added to Cart Add to Cart | Try again! Added to Cart Add to Cart | Try again! Added to Cart Add to Cart | Try again! Added to Cart Add to Cart | |
Price | $340.68$340.68 | $585.00$585.00 | $424.00$424.00 | $729.00$729.00 |
Delivery | — | — | Get it Apr 3 - 8 | — |
Customer Ratings | ||||
For gaming | — | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.3 |
Quality of material | — | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
Durability | — | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Noise level | — | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Easy to install | — | 4.7 | 4.7 | — |
Sold By | HDD Shop | Techno Sphere | Tools Plus More | Techno Sphere |
graphics coprocessor | Nvidia GeForce | gddr5 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 |
card interface | pci e | pci e | pci e | pci e |
graphics ram type | gddr5 | gddr5 | gddr5 | gddr5 |
graphics ram size | 6 GB | 8162 MB | 8 GB | 8 GB |
output interface | HDMI | — | DVI, HDMI | DisplayPort |
memory clock speed | 7010 MHz | 1506 MHz | 8008 MHz | 1683 MHz |
What's in the box
Looking for specific info?
Product Description
Introducing the EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Accelerated by the groundbreaking NVIDIA Maxwell architecture, GTX 980 Ti delivers an unbeatable 4K and virtual reality experience. With 2816 NVIDIA CUDA Cores and 6GB of GDDR5 memory, it has the horsepower to drive whatever comes next. In fact, the EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Ti provides 3x the performance and 3x the memory of previous generation cards. You can now take on even the most challenging games at high settings for a smooth, ultra high definition, 4K experience. These cards also feature EVGA ACX 2.0+ cooling technology. EVGA ACX 2.0+ brings new features to the award winning EVGA ACX 2.0 cooling technology. A memory MOSFET Cooling Plate (MMCP) reduces MOSFET temperatures up to 11C, and optimized Straight Heat Pipes (SHP) reduce GPU temperature by an additional 5C. ACX 2.0+ coolers also feature optimized swept fan blades, double ball bearings and an extreme low power motor, delivering more air flow with less power, unlocking additional power for the GPU.
Product information
Technical Details
Brand | EVGA |
---|---|
Item model number | 06G-P4-4993-KR |
Item Weight | 2.9 pounds |
Product Dimensions | 10.5 x 1.5 x 4.4 inches |
Item Dimensions LxWxH | 10.5 x 1.5 x 4.4 inches |
Manufacturer | EVGA |
ASIN | B00YDAYLTY |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
Date First Available | June 1, 2015 |
Additional Information
Customer Reviews |
4.5 out of 5 stars |
---|---|
Best Sellers Rank | #4,329 in Computer Graphics Cards |
Warranty & Support
Feedback
From the manufacturer
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers like the quality, performance, noise, temperature and value of the video card. For example, they mention that it looks like high quality stuff, runs awesome at all max settings and that the fan is quite smooth and quiet. That said, some appreciate the built-in liquid cooling and that it's an excellent product for the price.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers like the quality of the graphics card. They mention it's one of the best graphics cards to date, with a nice backplate to keep it safe. Some say that the card itself is amazing, and an awesome performing card. That said, most are happy with the design and performance of the product.
"...The radiator cooler is perfectly designed, and the EVGA branded fan is a static pressure fan that stays fairly quiet...." Read more
"Pros: Handles almost any game perfectly, quiet, attractive design, power consumptionCons: Expensive, a bit wider than other cards..." Read more
"...The game looks amazing!! I've never played it at ultra before and the game is just beautiful. It's amazing how much detail there is...." Read more
"Awesome performing card, just not an awesome price lol.Pro: Runs silent when not under load...." Read more
Customers are satisfied with the performance of the video card. They mention that it delivers great performance, runs awesome at all max settings, and performs as hoped for in gaming. The cooler is beautiful and does a decent job with a generous fan profile. It works great for the first 37 days and runs great on Windows 10. The rendering performance and speed is great with Adobe After FX and Adobe Premiere. Overall, customers describe the GPU as a powerhouse that is extremely powerful.
"...The performance difference is there, it is noticeable in gaming, and it is quite substantial to say the least...." Read more
"...The card is very power efficient already, this is due to EVGA bios limits for voltage, and honestly not a game changer for me since the whole..." Read more
"...Seems to be very power efficient also FWIW...." Read more
"...Seriously, I am impressed with this. Fps is excellent all across the board from a heavily modded Skyrim to Metal Gear Solid V 4K. Can't wait to test..." Read more
Customers like the noise level of the video card. They mention that it runs silent even while gaming, the fans don't seem loud at all, and that there is virtually no sound under load. Some say that the open air fans sound softer than the blower type, and some mention that the card and driver improve the sound.
"...It is quiet, and will only spin the reference memory fan on the card up if you seriously push the stress on the GPU but I have found this to be far..." Read more
"Pros: Handles almost any game perfectly, quiet, attractive design, power consumptionCons: Expensive, a bit wider than other cards..." Read more
"...(Top of the line gaming rig basically) that is supper small and very quiet thanks to the cards fan design...." Read more
"...The fans can get really loud if you crank them to 100%, but they have never gotten there even based on my aggressive fan curve...." Read more
Customers like the temperature of the video card. They say that it has cool temperatures for days, the heat output is very tame, and the air cooling is just fine. They also appreciate the built-in liquid cooling, which makes it easy to control the temperature. Some customers also mention that the card seems to be smart enough to control its own temperature.
"...It runs pretty cool most of the time. Mine idles around 40 C, which is a tad hot, but not horrible...." Read more
"...using my fan controller from NZXT and I have found that temps never go above 58c under FireStrike looped tests for 30 minutes...." Read more
"...this card has the ACX 2.0 cooler, it means that the fans don't run at lower temperatures; they will only spin up when the card gets too hot...." Read more
"...So, the new card seems to run slightly hotter than the last one at idle, but lower at gaming with ultra settings...." Read more
Customers like the value of the video card. They say it's an excellent product for the price, worth their time and money, and a great upgrade. Some mention that the built-in AIO cooler is a wonderful feature.
"...Doesn't make me better at Rocket LeagueThe price is really not all that bad considering the performance you get, and AMD has been..." Read more
"...EVGA did nail it with the looks and build of this card. It commands a hefty price tag and is backed up by EVGA who in the past I have been quite..." Read more
"...Very definition of an overkill card, but worth it. Played BF4 for a little the other day and my FPS were hitting as high as 200 on ultra...." Read more
"...it is definitely something that will be worth my time and money on the long run as it's been a year now and I don't see the..." Read more
Customers find the installation process of the video card to be super easy. They mention that the RMA process was simple, and the card was able to handle struggles with ease. Customers also appreciate the convenient hybrid solution and the ability to install on any part of the case. They say the updates are easy and seamless to install.
"...Revised - OK, the RMA process was very simple. People assured me that EVGA is a great company to work with, and they were not wrong...." Read more
"...Installation was a breeze even for a novice like myself and the card absolutely blew me away, regularly churning out 120+ frames per second on the..." Read more
"...Installation was easy, but a pro tip: there's some plastic film on the center of the fans ( the circles which I believe to maybe be covering screws)..." Read more
"...Shipping and install:As easy to install as any other Graphics card. Great Packaging. No damage to unit upon shipping.Pro:..." Read more
Customers are satisfied with the gaming capabilities of the video card. They mention it runs any game like a dream, gets the most out of games, and is very playable. Some say that the video cards struggles along at max settings on 4K, but overall, customers are happy with their purchase and recommend it for an amazing gaming experience.
"Pros: Handles almost any game perfectly, quiet, attractive design, power consumptionCons: Expensive, a bit wider than other cards..." Read more
"...This is perfect for a racing game where smoothness is more important than how shiny everything looks." Read more
"...Still smooth, playable, and like I said that game is very poorly optimized...." Read more
"An extraordinary technical achievement. This card EASILY runs all games on their highest settings with ease and is virtually inaudible in..." Read more
Customers are mixed about the overclocking capabilities of the video card. Some mention that it overclocks well, while others say that it doesn't like overclock at all. The price is reasonable, and the card is perfect for 3440x1440 resolution. However, some customers have reported issues with random crashes and slowdowns.
"...These cards are reference design, but surprisingly, they are overclocking friendly, or maybe I was just lucky...." Read more
"...The overclock is a little disappointing even for a 74% ASICS according to GPU-Z. Ultimately you'll want to water cool or use LN2 for this card...." Read more
"...Overclocking was also very easy, although absolutely not necessary for me as I was already achieving over 100 fps easily on most titles..." Read more
"...Pros: Single card with huge speed. Lots of overclocking potential. Nvidia drivers on game launch days. Looks sexy and sleek,..." Read more
Reviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
For anyone who is new to buying these parts or is interested in some facts to help make purchasing decisions, I will go over the reasoning behind my personal choices. First, I chose nVidia over AMD for my Graphics Card Unit (GPU) because, historically, AMD cards run hotter, and use more power compared to their nVidia counterparts. For a real-world example, the Fury X is the closest AMD card to the performance of the 980Ti (in benchmarks the 980Ti typically nets about 5-15 more FPS compared to the Fury X in both 4K and 1080p). This card under a heavy gaming load, drew 408W (according to AnandTech), whereas the 980Ti drew 388W (same source). The difference isn't much, but it's there. In regards to heat, AMD has been getting better, and typically the Fury X produces less heat under load.
I chose EVGA for their customer service reputation, as well as stellar cooling and factory overclocks, and backplate. Not much else to brands really.
I love this card. It obviously outperforms the 960 I previously used, but it kicks ass more than I imagined. This card is fairly capable of maxing out the settings (at 1080p) on about 90-95% of games and running at a solid 60 FPS. In my system, my CPU bottlenecks this card occasionally, depending on the demands of the game I'm (Fallout 4 for example). It runs pretty cool most of the time. Mine idles around 40 C, which is a tad hot, but not horrible. The fans can get really loud if you crank them to 100%, but they have never gotten there even based on my aggressive fan curve.
Its the typical EVGA GPU finish. Matte black, some silver highlights, complete with a white LED brand/model label that faces towards the side of the case. It has plenty of ports (1 HDMI, 1 DVI, 3 DP). It comes with a DVI to VGA adapter as well. All port come with dust blockers.
It fit perfectly fine in my (albeit overly-large) Corsair 750D Airflow Edition case on my ASUS Z97-A motherboard.
Due to a lack of actual performance information present in most people's reviews, I decided to have a section for in-game benchmark information, as touch on comparisons between it and the 960.
=========================================================================================================
Firstly, I'll list the parts in the rig I did these benchmarks in:
Intel i5-4690K overclocked to 4.4 GHz @ 1.2 V
EVGA GTX SC 980Ti
ASUS Z97-A
24 GB of DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
EVGA 750 G2 Power Supply
Windows 10 Pro
When I did the 960 benchmarks, my CPU was not overclocked, but I have compared the performance difference in-game from before and after the overclock with the 980Ti. In the best-case scenario, the overclocking only changed the FPS ~5 from stock CPU clock speed in nearly everything, so my results - 5 FPS, would be a fair comparison to the 980Ti with my CPU at a stock clock speed.
In general, the 980Ti gets 15+ FPS more than the 960, in some games getting 30+ FPS more. I will note the performance difference for each benchmark that I have information on both.
On to benchmarks!:
BioShock Infinite: Ultra/Max settings
AVERAGE: 139
MINIMUM: 37
MAXIMUM: 252
Average FPS was 67 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Hitman: Absolution: Ultra settings w/ MSAA off
AVERAGE: 85
MINIMUM: 70
MAXIMUM: 102
Average FPS was 15 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Thief: High preset
AVERAGE: 101
MINIMUM: 71
MAXIMUM: 143
Average FPS was 41 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Metro 2033 Redux: Max setting w/ Tesselation on High, SSAA off & Advanced PhysX off
AVERAGE: 87
MINIMUM: 26
MAXIMUM: 268
Average FPS was 18 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Just Cause 2: Max settings
The Dark Tower AVERAGE: 130
Desert Sunrise AVERAGE: 146
Concrete Jungle AVERAGE: 97
Average FPS' were 33 - 69 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Benchmarks with no comparison:
Hitman: Absolution: Ultra preset
AVERAGE: 53
MINIMUM: 44
MAXIMUM: 144
Thief: Very High preset w/ 16x
AVERAGE: 97
MINIMUM: 71
MAXIMUM: 124
Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor: Ultra settings without HD texture pack installed
AVERAGE: 116
MINIMUM: 79
MAXIMUM: 164
Metro 2033 Redux: Max settings
AVERAGE: 51
MINIMUM: 16
MAXIMUM: 162
Metro: Last Light Redux: Max settings
AVERAGE: 69
MINIMUM: 19
MAXIMUM: 147
Grand Theft Auto V: Max settings with all Advanced Graphics options off
AVERAGE: 49
MINIMUM: 29
MAXIMUM: 119
The Talos Principle: Ultra preset
AVERAGE: 143
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2016
For anyone who is new to buying these parts or is interested in some facts to help make purchasing decisions, I will go over the reasoning behind my personal choices. First, I chose nVidia over AMD for my Graphics Card Unit (GPU) because, historically, AMD cards run hotter, and use more power compared to their nVidia counterparts. For a real-world example, the Fury X is the closest AMD card to the performance of the 980Ti (in benchmarks the 980Ti typically nets about 5-15 more FPS compared to the Fury X in both 4K and 1080p). This card under a heavy gaming load, drew 408W (according to AnandTech), whereas the 980Ti drew 388W (same source). The difference isn't much, but it's there. In regards to heat, AMD has been getting better, and typically the Fury X produces less heat under load.
I chose EVGA for their customer service reputation, as well as stellar cooling and factory overclocks, and backplate. Not much else to brands really.
I love this card. It obviously outperforms the 960 I previously used, but it kicks ass more than I imagined. This card is fairly capable of maxing out the settings (at 1080p) on about 90-95% of games and running at a solid 60 FPS. In my system, my CPU bottlenecks this card occasionally, depending on the demands of the game I'm (Fallout 4 for example). It runs pretty cool most of the time. Mine idles around 40 C, which is a tad hot, but not horrible. The fans can get really loud if you crank them to 100%, but they have never gotten there even based on my aggressive fan curve.
Its the typical EVGA GPU finish. Matte black, some silver highlights, complete with a white LED brand/model label that faces towards the side of the case. It has plenty of ports (1 HDMI, 1 DVI, 3 DP). It comes with a DVI to VGA adapter as well. All port come with dust blockers.
It fit perfectly fine in my (albeit overly-large) Corsair 750D Airflow Edition case on my ASUS Z97-A motherboard.
Due to a lack of actual performance information present in most people's reviews, I decided to have a section for in-game benchmark information, as touch on comparisons between it and the 960.
=========================================================================================================
Firstly, I'll list the parts in the rig I did these benchmarks in:
Intel i5-4690K overclocked to 4.4 GHz @ 1.2 V
EVGA GTX SC 980Ti
ASUS Z97-A
24 GB of DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
EVGA 750 G2 Power Supply
Windows 10 Pro
When I did the 960 benchmarks, my CPU was not overclocked, but I have compared the performance difference in-game from before and after the overclock with the 980Ti. In the best-case scenario, the overclocking only changed the FPS ~5 from stock CPU clock speed in nearly everything, so my results - 5 FPS, would be a fair comparison to the 980Ti with my CPU at a stock clock speed.
In general, the 980Ti gets 15+ FPS more than the 960, in some games getting 30+ FPS more. I will note the performance difference for each benchmark that I have information on both.
On to benchmarks!:
BioShock Infinite: Ultra/Max settings
AVERAGE: 139
MINIMUM: 37
MAXIMUM: 252
Average FPS was 67 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Hitman: Absolution: Ultra settings w/ MSAA off
AVERAGE: 85
MINIMUM: 70
MAXIMUM: 102
Average FPS was 15 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Thief: High preset
AVERAGE: 101
MINIMUM: 71
MAXIMUM: 143
Average FPS was 41 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Metro 2033 Redux: Max setting w/ Tesselation on High, SSAA off & Advanced PhysX off
AVERAGE: 87
MINIMUM: 26
MAXIMUM: 268
Average FPS was 18 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Just Cause 2: Max settings
The Dark Tower AVERAGE: 130
Desert Sunrise AVERAGE: 146
Concrete Jungle AVERAGE: 97
Average FPS' were 33 - 69 FPS higher than the SSC 960
Benchmarks with no comparison:
Hitman: Absolution: Ultra preset
AVERAGE: 53
MINIMUM: 44
MAXIMUM: 144
Thief: Very High preset w/ 16x
AVERAGE: 97
MINIMUM: 71
MAXIMUM: 124
Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor: Ultra settings without HD texture pack installed
AVERAGE: 116
MINIMUM: 79
MAXIMUM: 164
Metro 2033 Redux: Max settings
AVERAGE: 51
MINIMUM: 16
MAXIMUM: 162
Metro: Last Light Redux: Max settings
AVERAGE: 69
MINIMUM: 19
MAXIMUM: 147
Grand Theft Auto V: Max settings with all Advanced Graphics options off
AVERAGE: 49
MINIMUM: 29
MAXIMUM: 119
The Talos Principle: Ultra preset
AVERAGE: 143
Be fully aware, while it will overclock, we all place the lottery with GPU processors, and everyone will find a stable overclock at different levels. I based mine on JayzTwoCent's overclock and reviews of the Hybrid, and got a 100Mhz on the GPU and a 300Mhz on the Memory. Some will get their GPU clocks over the magical 1500 number, while others will not get that number. I get 1480 roughly and I am happy with it. As a single 980ti GPU on an Intel I7 3770K Overclocked to 4.2Ghz, I have found it to perform far better than I ever expected.
It is quiet, and will only spin the reference memory fan on the card up if you seriously push the stress on the GPU but I have found this to be far harder than you would think and that is a great discovery.
The radiator cooler is perfectly designed, and the EVGA branded fan is a static pressure fan that stays fairly quiet. The fan control on the card is only for the reference memory cooling fan and not the radiator fan as many people thought at first.
I have found that disconnecting the radiator fan from the card itself, and plugging it into your MOBO or a fan controller works much better for control purposes. I run my 980ti hybrid at the lowest RPM setting using my fan controller from NZXT and I have found that temps never go above 58c under FireStrike looped tests for 30 minutes.
If I ramp up the RPMs though I can see a dramatic temp drop from 58c to 48c and that is insane in my mind. It is clear the AIO cooler works very efficiently and that is what you should expect for this type of Hybrid card.
The idea behind buying this version of the 980ti over the air cooled cards is not so much in overclocking ability as I see the other brands of 980ti cards on the market that are not water cooled overclocking much higher than the EVGA Hybrids do, but it comes down to noise, and life of the card over time. I wanted a quieter gaming rig that could handle the highest end and most demanding games without going SLI. I wanted control over the radiator fan, something you can not get with the other brand of Hybrid AIO 980ti cards on the market yet, looking at your Corsair Seahawk 980ti!!!
I also live in Florida and summer temps play a big part in why the Hybrid AIO options was my choice. If you live in cooler environments the Hybrid may not support the added costs over the other brands of air cooled cards as those coolers do work amazingly well already. But if you are in a hotter place, the Hybrid can help keep GPU temps much lower over much longer play sessions.
Overclocking can be done using MSI afterburner or the EVGA software, but I like MSI version better. Card does have a hard voltage cap though which is why you will not see the much higher overclock you may be thinking you can get with a water cooled card. In my testing the hard limit seems to be 1.28v roughly, and the card running at 110% of its TDP already comes close to that limit out the box, which is why you may see issues getting it stable at 1500 on the GPU. The card is very power efficient already, this is due to EVGA bios limits for voltage, and honestly not a game changer for me since the whole purpose of the Hybrid is to remain cooler, longer, and quieter longer.
Play your luck though and see what OC you can reach we will all reach different OC levels.
Top reviews from other countries
Operan intracomunitario pero no quitan el IVA como debe ser, a profesionales. Has de esperar al año siguiente y reclamar el IVA al pais anfitrion. Un follon vamos. No les costaria nada dar esa opcion como cualquier proveedor internacional. La unica opcion que me dieron era devolver el producto. MAL.
*Update* (May 1/16)
I have a replacement card coming and will test the HDMI on it. I will report back if it was just a faulty card.
*Update* (May 5/16)
So I received my replacement card and it works PERFECTLY. The last card had a faulty HDMI port. Even though the port worked for a regular monitor, it did not work for a HTC Vive VR HMD. I also tested the faulty card's Display Port and that worked like a charm. But I still need the HDMI port free and functioning for the Oculus Rift CV1. I will revise my review to perfect.
He de admitir que la primera tarjeta que me mandó Amazon venía defectuosa por lo que tuve que mandarla a Estados Unidos directamente con EVGA quienes me la cambiaron sin costo alguno (solo pagué el primer envío) y a partir de entonces no he tenido ningún problema.
Su costo es elevado pero si quieres jugar a resolución 4k o tener el máximo desempeño a 1080p o 1440p es lo que necesitas.