Edited review!(Note: Its possible that the specific unit is defective but in light of many other customers reviews it seem to have quite a bit of faulty devices with same behavior.)Conclusion & Bottom line:=====================After few weeks of experience The Rocket nano 1TB looks like something who every one wish, with exciting design, and promising specifications. But unfortunately the ongoing use and experience is utterly disappointing.The device is characterized by instability with frequent hangs behavior, along with a very low performance that is actually lower than even a generic flash device.Pro: Small & cool dosing, lightweight, supplied with 2 matching cables (though too short and not flexible enough)Cons: Un-stable, Extremely slow, very poor performance, tends to hang continuously. reach in test rate of 36Mb/s instead of 1000Gb/s, while in real usage its even worst drop down to 1500k/s.Tests were performed in 3 sessions, and review is edited to update and providing the results.Well, since my first review, I collected more info & experience with this Rocket usage, and things just went worst. :(My first review was written (about two weeks ago) after having many attempts to find out what is the *real* performance speed.I used many PC's with various HW. I was able to archive at best results only 1/4 of its specification, means around 250mb/s, This was with H81 chipset which runs USB 3.0 (not 3.1).But I wasn't able to get such performance on newer HW which runs the lasted USB 3.2 10gb/s.in these cases it always hang or achieve poor performance even slower then generic flash drive.I tried several times to perform tests on the brand new PC (running Win10 64Bit) with lasted USB 3.2 10Gb/s port (Intel build in) in most of them the disk just stack and wasn't even able to complete the tests. so it was impossible to perform the tests & competition. - no screenshot were saved for that session.At the second test session, the machine used for testing was only USB 3.0 NEC chipset, where after several attempts only few terminated, but at all the rest, the Rocket failed to perform a complete test.See screenshot & the tests details below.Also tried to use it in real use, copying 250GB of MP3 files while attached to an USB 3.1 port (5Gb/s), took more then 6 hours, which most the time the transfer rate was under 1500 kb/s - extremely slow compared to any other flash or mechanical HD.In practice, in real use, the device is malfunctioning, often hangs up, and its performance drops drastically after more than 2 minutes of use.This was frustrating and nerve-wracking experience.As a PC technician with access to hundreds of different types of computers, I have not been able to prove a reasonable use of this device.Even compared to a standard flash device its capabilities are terrible.It is possible that the only unit I received is defected, so it is important to get feedback from other users.Screenshots attached related to the second test session (first group) are for 3 different storage, which were taken in competition on USB 3.0 port powered by NEC (not the 3.2 which failed in all attempts).1. Rocket nano 1TB (succeed only once ! )2. Corsair Flash Voyager GTX 256GB USB 3.1 Premium3. Silicon Power jewel j80 usb 3.1 32GBall screenshots includes description of the relevant storage and the relevant test results.A third tests session was taken on 30.01.20.This time I tried again a new Lenovo PC. this are the specifications.CPU -Intel I5- 8th generation, 12GB DDR4, Plextor PH6 System SSD (runs Win10 Pro 64 bit), NVIDIA 1650,This PC nativelly support USB3.2 10Gb/s by Intel chipset.I used 3 different USB devices as above replacing the SP J80 by the system SSD -Plextor PH6. runs 3 software for the benchmarks.ATTO , AS-SSD, & Crystal Disk-Mark.The results are shown in the new screenshots (Group two).The rocket failed to perform any tests with ATTO & AS-SSD, only 'Crystal-disk' succeed it once (after many failures) but with a rate of 36Mb/s~ only. slower then the Silicon-Power J80.=========My earlier review: Tested the "Rocket" and was unable to be even close to half of the declared speed.I repeated test on 4 different machines which had various HW combination, the highest speed I was able to reach stuck on 250mb/s. Both read & write operations. only 1/4 of the declared.So I can not confirm if its only my specific one that is defective or is just the real speed of this Disk. very disappointing.